Bertrando3
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2010
- Messages
- 5,462
- Reaction score
- 2,129
Such a boring cover once again...
Possibly. But it's hard not to see it as stereotype when vogue.it even has sections on its websites called "Vogue Black" and "Vogue Curvy". I just don't see why these 'minorities' can't be integrated into a normal issue without being treated like some sort of anomaly that need their own categories. But maybe that's just me. It would just seem a lot more credible to me if VI featured them regularly, but maybe they will start doing that from now on (which I don't quite believe).
You know, I've just read through this and I hadn't even noticed the plates with food on them and why the hell should I, when there are stunning women looking glamorous and provocative and who really cares anyway.
These are the last covers that VI ran with a larger model - Feb and April 2000 with Sophie Dahl:
Has VI moved forwards or backwards?
Basically then, you agree that is it an individual perspective as to whether one thing is more or less sexual than another?
Can we ALL agree then that this is the case and put that particular argument to bed and get back to looking at pretty ladies?