It does, there is no way they would make such typo and credit the wrong photographer,but i guess we need to wait until someone that actually has the issue confirms it.Solve Sundsbo shot the editorial so wouldn't it be a big possibility that he, not M&M, shot the cover as well?
It does, there is no way they would make such typo and credit the wrong photographer,but i guess we need to wait until someone that actually has the issue confirms it.
agreed, maybe I will not even buy it^ thank you, achAT Looks like not very exiting issue
Meisel has an ed, not a reprint?
It's not really an ed., it's a story on "using a computer to alter photos" [english summary] and "a lone group of gentlemen have spoken out against retouching" [same] - 2 pages text. And 2 pages with 2x2 photos by Meisel sort of untouched/retouched.