WSJ Magazine September 2018 : The Power of 10 by Inez van Lamsweerde & Vinoodh Matadin

I’d settle for the first one but they’re all awful to be honest and what’s with these models.. Freja, of all people. It’s like someone made a cover out of those signatures some members have ‘Thairine Garcia, Tasha Tilberg, Ali Stephens, Raquel.. and Adwoa’. An interesting array that must mean something to.. one person only....
 
^^^ Isn’t that the general direction of HF these day…??? Desperately copping for the populists' approval?

Why else would Kylie Jenner get the cover of a September Vogue? Or Miuccia and Donatella watering down their brand to such knock-off level of basics, ODing on logos? Or why just passably ”creative" individuals like Virgil and Tyler are hailed/hyped as the new “creators”? Or why 1st-year art/design/fashion students get to run Vogue Portugal/Ukraine/Czechoslovakia? It’s all down to professional adults dumbing down their sensibilities to desperately be down with the kidz for likes and followers in hope their brand scores sales. (Just look at TFS: Why the need to implement a “like” feature— which seems to discourage a discussion and further engagement of any given topic. But it sure makes posters feel… liked (I guess that's the point LOOOL)
 
The cast is stellar, but what's with the harsh make-up and lighting combo on the covers? as many have said, the black and white photos are much better cover options than the chosen one
 
Now THIS is how to do September! WSJ Magazine (once again) putting the mainstream fashion titles to shame with their covers, showing the likes of American Vogue and Harper's Bazaar how it should be done.

Inez & Vinoodh and George Cortina are a total dream team, and they've made the best out of each model here (Rianne looks sensational, as does Anna, Andreea, Imaan.... basically everyone!). :heart:
 
The cast is stellar, but what's with the harsh make-up and lighting combo on the covers? as many have said, the black and white photos are much better cover options than the chosen one

No idea what they were thinking with the makeup on Rianne and Adwoa’s covers (I suspect that was added in post since they're the only ones with it, just to make the cover pop.... But I’m convinced Benn had a hand in styling and making Adwoa up to sabotage her cover…).

And I&V may not be solely blamed for the awful post-production “lighting”: There’re some very blatantly heavy-handedness with the retouching overall-- which may be what Kristina demanded from I&V.
 
No idea what they were thinking with the makeup on Rianne and Adwoa’s covers (I suspect that was added in post since they're the only ones with it, just to make the cover pop.... But I’m convinced Benn had a hand in styling and making Adwoa up to sabotage her cover…)./QUOTE]

Lmao! I think you'll find Adwoa is quite capable of delivering an atrocious shot with her trademark 'living dead girl' expression on her own. No amount of make-up interference can distract from that. So your little allowance which you're making for her is cute. But no.
In fact, maybe the make-up artist wanted to do something, anything, just to compensate for her blank profile.
 
All these multi-covers just highlight who the stars are. A few faces really stand out and make the other girls look pretty bland by comparison. Love the big hair though!
 
First cover looks fine to me. The rest of them look out of place.
 
Carolyn Murphy, Karlie Kloss and Doutzen Kroes


Tao Okamoto, Rianne van Rompaey and Freja Beha Erichsen


Andreea Diaconu, Anna Ewers and Imaan Hammam


Imaan Hammam and Andreea Diaconu


Rianne van Rompaey and Adwoa Aboah


 
Last edited:
I found the WSJ article but i cant see the names =_=
Code:
 https://www.wsj.com/articles/10-of-the-worlds-most-celebrated-models-cover-wsj-magazines-tenth-anniversary-issue-1534305731?cx_refModule=nwsrl&mod=nwsrl_icons

Found in another place.
Code:
https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/news-analysis/wsj-magazines-tenth-anniversary-issue-is-big-but-its-digital-ambitions-are-bigger
 
Interview with Ashley and Mary-Kate Olsen:


wsj

ASHLEY OLSEN SHRUGS on a navy-blue cashmere men’s jacket over her black sweatshirt and sinks her hands into its pockets. Her delicate frame is dwarfed by six hanging racks of men’s suits, shirts and jeans in the loftlike Manhattan showroom of The Row, the fashion brand Ashley co-founded with her sister Mary-Kate. Mary-Kate points to the jacket and says firmly, “When you put this on, you know that it’s not from Italy. It’s not from France. It’s very, very clean.” Ashley nods vigorously.

The jacket was made in Japan, a nation whose strong tailoring tradition is little known in the U.S. This new men’s collection is The Row’s latest initiative, and the subdued tones subtly exude ease. There is no bold Gucci-inspired embroidery, Thom Browne–esque shrunken sizing or low-slung streetwear styling.

Ashley has been wearing the jacket as part of the meticulous system that she and her sister formulated since founding The Row in 2006. It is the result of a two-year project in which they and their small team traveled the globe, inspected seams, counted stitches and pitted factories against one another. Taking a page from industrial manufacturing, they employed performance trials that they call “wear-testing”: trying the clothes themselves or asking friends and associates to borrow samples and report back. This is not new—this is how The Row works: slowly.

Back to the jacket. Its cut is infinitesimally shorter than that of traditional blazers, and it features a style of lining the sisters discovered in Japan in which a layer of the suiting fabric is sewn inside nearly to the armpit. Into this is cut the interior pocket, which Ashley calls, with precision, a besom—the tailoring term for a flapless pocket with reinforced trim. A signature of The Row’s new suiting, this lining gives blazers a polished look while eliminating layers of horsehair or other structural materials that shape many European and American suit jackets.

“When a garment is made like that, it has a look and you can just tell,” says James Gilchrist, general manager of Dover Street Market in the U.S., which carries The Row’s womenswear and has ordered the men’s.

The Row is primarily a luxury womenswear label with a following among mature fashion lovers who won’t blink at a $1,350 cashmere hoodie or a $6,790 lambskin skirt. The brand has dabbled in selling a few men’s pieces— “just putting little things out there,” says Mary-Kate—such as a shoe collaboration with the Italian footwear artisan Enzo Bonafè. This is the first time they are debuting a full men’s collection, which includes several denim pieces and knitwear but revolves around tailored separates and suits, ranging in price from $3,950 to $5,795. The highest-priced item in the fall 2018 collection—a chinchilla overcoat—is $7,850.

If there is a reason to question The Row’s move into menswear, it would be the timing. Subtle tailoring is not the latest trend. Slogan tees and hoodies are today’s obsession. James Jebbia of skate brand Supreme was awarded the Menswear Designer of the Year by the Council of Fashion Designers of America (CFDA) in June. A few weeks later, street-style guru Virgil Abloh showed his first menswear collection for Louis Vuitton in Paris—and it was a color wheel of floral hoodies, a silvery Space Age cape and bright athletic wear.

Mention of the streetwear trend causes the sisters to raise their eyebrows in unison. “I don’t think people are taking big risks in menswear,” says Ashley.

“It’s funny, because this is more of a risk than putting words on a T-shirt,” Mary-Kate says. “Who knew that black, gorgeous, perfectly fitted suits would be a risk?”


The Row’s president, David Schulte, suggests the industry is lacking the male equivalent of the sophisticated ease that the label has offered women. “There’s plenty of hoodies out there, but there’s not a lot of places to go buy a beautiful suit,” he says.

The decision to expand into menswear was prompted by customers, friends and family who frequently asked, “When are you starting it? Where can I find it?” Ashley says. The concept was to create something “for the husband” of The Row’s female clients, adds Mary-Kate, noting that her own husband, Olivier Sarkozy, is a habitual suit wearer. In 2016, the sisters began the development process in earnest. “We spent a year really figuring out the fit of the suit,” says Ashley. “Single-breasted, double-breasted, tuxedo,” says Mary-Kate.

They labored over and then lengthened the pants’ rise at the waist. “I think a men’s rise has gotten short and small,” says Ashley. “There’s something about a slightly higher rise that is quite sexy.”

“We’re talking millimeters,” says Mary-Kate.

They sent identical instructions and materials to different factories, evaluating what came back. Some factories improved on the designs by perfecting the stitching around a buttonhole or collar, or making a subtly better curve on a cuff. “People have their strengths. We like to utilize them,” Mary-Kate says.

Ultimately, they selected factories in France for shirts, Japan for suiting, Italy for knits and the U.S. for denim and T-shirts. The Row’s linings are hand-stitched. A single piece of felted melton fabric under the jacket collars is hand-molded for a precise curve. There is only a hint of branding: On the underside of ties, tiny hand-stitched threads spell out the row.

The brand’s retailers say they see a market for an alternative to the busier style of brands like Kiton, traditional suit makers like Zegna or even made-to-measure suits from The Row’s British namesake, Savile Row. The Row’s direction is “a very reductive, minimalist approach to tailoring,” says Bruce Pask, men’s fashion director at Bergdorf Goodman and Neiman Marcus. “It’s not highly sartorial and yet it’s tailored…. This reminds me of what Helmut Lang was doing in his day.”

And designing for men has inspired the sisters to consider new tailoring for their women’s collections. Ashley says, “Menswear has shifted our eye.”

THE ROW HAS BEEN defying expectations since it was launched. The brand presented collections during New York and Paris fashion weeks but eschewed splashy runway shows for intimate breakfasts at locations like the Carlyle Hotel, where models meandered among the tables and guests were asked not to take photos (a request many ignored).

In the early days, the label struggled to overcome the public image of its founders as paparazzi-chased child actresses who had developed a boho-chic look more reminiscent of L.A. vintage stores than Bergdorf Goodman. Most Americans knew the Olsens, who are fraternal twins, for playing tot Michelle Tanner on the ABC sitcom Full House from 1987 to 1995 and for their later Mary-Kate and Ashley videos.
 
^ Continued...

Now 32, the Olsens are still sensitive about references to their childhood career, and also to suggestions that as twins they are interchangeable. While they work together closely, their adult lives are emphatically independent. Ashley, who once expected to become an architect, is considering a move back to Los Angeles from New York. Mary-Kate, who in 2015 married Sarkozy, a French banker and the half-brother of former French president Nicolas Sarkozy, says she is firmly ensconced in New York.

Still, the sisters, who have two siblings and two half-siblings, often appear to think in unison, completing each other’s sentences. “It’s been 32 years of learning how to communicate,” says Ashley, who says their relationship is “a marriage and a partnership. We have had ups and downs.”

The Olsens say their early experiences with costumes as actors helped to spur their obsession with clothing details. “Our whole lives we spent most of our time in fittings,” says Mary-Kate. “Because we’re so petite, we had to cut clothes to our size.”

With zero formal training, they began their fashion careers in 2005 in pursuit of the perfect T-shirt, which they sold at Barneys New York a year later. They researched local factories in Los Angeles and made their first pieces at a lingerie factory where the workers, accustomed to fragile materials, were able to execute tiny seams on their ultralight cotton. They later launched Elizabeth and James, a midprice fashion line that still sells today.

The Row is a sophisticated evolution of that original tee, one they say has a calculated appeal to the tastes and shapes of women over age 40, an unusual strategy for a label with young designers. And it turned out to be a sleeper hit, picking up retailers including Barneys, Saks Fifth Avenue, Net-a-Porter and Bergdorf Goodman, as well as opening its own boutiques on East 71st Street in New York and on L.A.’s Melrose Place. Fashion editors who had anticipated another Hollywood star branding effort found instead well-designed and deeply luxurious collections, one after another. Awards followed, including the CFDA’s prestigious Womenswear Designer of the Year in 2012. This past June, the evening before they were arranging the new menswear in their Greenwich Street showroom, the Olsens accepted the CFDA Accessory Designer of the Year Award.

The brand is privately owned by the sisters and is largely self-financed. “We have a very small investor, but it’s not a fashion investor,” says Ashley. The brand won’t reveal its annual revenues, but one industry insider estimates they are respectable but relatively small.

Decisions in the Olsen universe are parsed and discussed until agreement is reached. “We do everything together,” Ashley says. “We came out of the womb doing that,” says Mary-Kate.

For six months they debated where to place the two handles of the roomy unisex Margaux bag. Should the handles be attached inside, for a more classic look, or outside, for a minimalist, modern take? The office was polled. The results came in 50-50. So the Margaux was produced both ways. For men, they are also introducing a small number of thin wallets, card carriers and belts, as well as leather-soled shoes.

Criticism of The Row almost universally revolves around its prices, which rival luxe European brands such as Céline and Bottega Veneta. “We have clients that understand it and then other clients that think that our product is more expensive than it is,” says Mary-Kate. “People focus on the hype. But actually—”

“We are competitively priced,” Ashley says.

Retailers say the prices aren’t deterring clients, and the evidence backs them up. It’s unusual for a 21st-century fashion brand to make its revenues primarily from a large assortment of clothes, rather than from leather goods and accessories, yet the brand does, putting it in rare company.

‘We never started the company with the intention of it being a fashion brand.’
—Ashley Olsen
Jennifer Sunwoo, chief merchandising officer for Barneys New York, counts The Row among Barneys’ three top-selling ready-to-wear brands. “The performance has been incredibly strong, delivering consistent growth with extremely high sell-throughs,” says Sunwoo, who expects similar performance eventually from the brand’s menswear, saying that it stands out from “today’s prevailing influence of fast-fashion.”

This has come without the social-media and influence marketing that is now standard. The label’s Instagram account, with one million followers, rarely posts photos of its own products. Instead there are the designers’ inspirations—an art piece by Georges Jouve, a flatware service by Pierre Legrain or a photo of Jean Cocteau. “I think the clothes speak for themselves, and so to put a face or a name with the product doesn’t ever feel right,” says Mary-Kate.

“We’re not product pushers,” Ashley says, adding, “I don’t know if it’s because of the way we grew up—we just don’t like talking about ourselves or talking about what we’re doing.... It’s not really our approach.”

The Row’s own stores break with tradition by selling furnishings, artwork and even vintage jewelry. Some of the furniture is discovered for the brand by the Paris-based dealer Patrick Seguin. The label debuted its menswear in Seguin’s 11th arrondissement gallery along with an exhibit of furniture by Jean Prouvé, Le Corbusier and Charlotte Perriand. “The Row exudes real appreciation for an overall aesthetic, ranging from clothing to art to design,” Seguin wrote by email. “They have a minimalist approach that prioritizes quality materials.”

The Olsens can be hard to persuade using pure profit potential as a motive. Pete Nordstrom, co-president of Nordstrom, says he has been trying to bring the brand to his family’s stores for several years but the Olsens haven’t been swayed by the revenue potential of a large store chain. “They don’t approach the business like others do, caring about growth,” Nordstrom says.

The Olsens are also proud tech skeptics. The Row’s website currently directs potential shoppers to the brand’s two stores, offering no prices and no online sales. But Ashley says, to Mary-Kate’s consternation, that they are hoping to launch digital sales in 2019.

The Olsens agree that growth, in itself, isn’t the goal. “We never started the company with the intention of it being a fashion brand,” says Ashley. “It really was a passion project,” says Mary-Kate.

They say they are considering a launch of skin-care products, small leather goods such as wallets for women and more than one store in Europe.

In the meantime, they prefer to continue as they began, taking time to ponder ideas, make a few samples, test factories and ponder some more before launching anything new. “It’s not like one day we wake up and say, We’re going to grow this business, and we’re going to have a menswear collection,” says Mary-Kate. “That’s not the way we look at it.”

“Let’s not put a deadline on it,” says Ashley.

“Let’s make it perfect before we offer it,” adds Mary-Kate.
wsj
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->