With all due respect Happiness, I think you have entirely missed the point of this debate. What has Dakota playing the part have anything to do with the film being made and how good it is? Not having a 12 year old in a r*pe scene somehow doesn't equate to pushing things under the rugs (just out of linguistic interest (not being sarcastic!) why did you use inverted commas there?) And the only discussion this will spark, believe you me, is that Hollywood is becoming more and more money hungry and that we, the Western world, are full of some sick sh*t.
And furthermore I dont want studio executives to determine the morality of a nation or how we view laws. I want the legal system to do that for me. If we had mawkish films about paedophiles having Titanic-proportioned success, we'd have lynchings in the streets. And that would be ridiculous. It is up to the police to make the system of reporting rapes, functional. People are already ridiculous about the paedophile anyway. It is such as exaggerated urban fear.
Yes because at 12 years old, she is making all her career decisions for herself?! Can you imagine what the sort of psychotic-bimbo-hillbilly mothers who push their kids into showbusiness instead of hope they will become doctors are like? Yeah Dakota, play in a r*pe scene and sew my arm back on whilst you are at it. Oh and Timmy is stuck down a well