PDFSD
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2024
- Messages
- 1,967
- Reaction score
- 6,566
i struggle with the question myself ingereralI understand what your point is but seems like you missed mine.
Given what he did in a past from the same position as Rider and seeing what he is now, his opinion seems only fueled by bitterness.
For me his opinion would matter if he did something very substantial both at Jil, Trussardi and Ports but no three fails.
I don’t mind negative opinions and rather tend to look at them more than the positives ones.
However, when voicing a public (negative) opinion like he did, it needs some legitimacy to back it up.
it just bugs me to see his post about Rider/Celine and then 90% of his are half naked white men + his buttcheeks/nipples/bulges/feet. 😂
i understand the need from the public for legitimacy and authority from public figures when they express opinions.
but still should it not matter more what he says for the sake of discussing the collection by Rider ?than who he is? public or not ?
the reverse can be then applied with same logic to Phoebe or John G. and many more for allegedly made strange comments or dubious behaviors in the past does it mean there design work is less valid per example?
i think context in argument matter but it could have just as well be anonymous and one could argue based on just the written words, he is not so wrong with his statement as CK was also a disaster.