londoner, your city is the place where i was several times accosted as a c***k (and many other things i don't even understand). and if i remember correctly, your prince something called some of his brothers-in-arms pakis and how many people - columnists, talking heads, and just every other ordinary anglosaxons - came to his defense?
i call BS on this: a big chunk of revenue of lvmh now comes from china and chinese tourists visiting europe, but how did they handle the situation when sharon stone made that idiotic comment about chinese? when dior stores were besieged by mobs, when the govt. shut down an lv store in hangzhou, when that jew -arnault something - himself was dragged to beijing to get a dress down, dior reluctantly pulled that woman's ads only from china (which wasn't really a gesture given that the govt agency had the power to pull any and all ads within china and at that point was pretty bound to do), had dior china issue a half-***ed apologetic statement that was subsequently negated by its people in paris, and continued a warm and public relationship with that woman the world over.
it is not commercial. and given dior's long record of racism in china, the galliano incident thing isn't even about racism. it punishes only antisemitism and perhaps the arnault guy's huge ego.
not that it was a wise thing for the jewish management to do: the more gap it puts between racism and antisemitism, the less friends it has and risks becoming a real target of real racism.
**edited by mod**
rather than getting into specifics of who was or wasn't killed or whether you believe in freedom of all speech or not, the important point is that Galliano was the figure head of a global brand and i'll bet that they make a pretty penny from their Jewish customer. as a corporation there is no way they could let him continue on after these incidents.
i call BS on this: a big chunk of revenue of lvmh now comes from china and chinese tourists visiting europe, but how did they handle the situation when sharon stone made that idiotic comment about chinese? when dior stores were besieged by mobs, when the govt. shut down an lv store in hangzhou, when that jew -arnault something - himself was dragged to beijing to get a dress down, dior reluctantly pulled that woman's ads only from china (which wasn't really a gesture given that the govt agency had the power to pull any and all ads within china and at that point was pretty bound to do), had dior china issue a half-***ed apologetic statement that was subsequently negated by its people in paris, and continued a warm and public relationship with that woman the world over.
it is not commercial. and given dior's long record of racism in china, the galliano incident thing isn't even about racism. it punishes only antisemitism and perhaps the arnault guy's huge ego.
not that it was a wise thing for the jewish management to do: the more gap it puts between racism and antisemitism, the less friends it has and risks becoming a real target of real racism.
**edited by mod**
Last edited by a moderator:
