Do you dress eccentrically? | Page 9 | the Fashion Spot

Do you dress eccentrically?

10308margaweb.jpg

source/sartorialist.com


This skirt it's such a creation:heart:
 
Just stopped by to note that fashion.fashoff has Sun and Mercury (communication) in Virgo, and Venus in Leo. We also both have Sagittarius rising (which might lead to forthrightness in communicating who you really are through your personal style).

Does anyone else have pix to post? :flower:

fashionista-ta, i don't understand all these astrology talk.. i only know that i'm a Taurean and i seem to fit very much the traits of a typical Taurus. what do mean by Sun in Virgo etc
 
for more talk about astrology and personal style, there is a thread here :flower:

let's move that conversation there

Right, sorry for our little detour. (It must be my Mercury in Gemini, I just love to go off on tangents.^_^)

Just to be clear, can this thread include examples of avant garde style in general (historical figures, fashion shows etc.), or is it meant to be a discussion and pictures of streetstyle?
 
actually i'd love to see 'avant-garde' in past times . i was about to post some myself

i thought it was only till the 80s with the "hiroshima chic" designers that they started using the term avant-garde in fashion

but maybe designer elsa schiaparelli (1890-1973) could fit in there..
i remember reading she is also described as a surrealist
 
^yes schiaparelli was a surrealist. she associated with dali and others.
one of my favorite pieces by her is a dress with trompe l'oeil printed tears/rips on it. she also did a really great "skeleton dress" that had narrow padded inserts shaped like ribs/bones
the closest recent comparison to schiaparelli is probably franco moschino, who used a similar whimsy, surrealist point of view, and offbeat sense of humor in his work.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i found the pics of the pieces i mentioned

both are from 1938.

tear dress. i guess this is really avant-garde, since it uses tears/"damage" as an integral part of its design, something that did not really recur in fashion until the japanese designers in 1981. however it is slightly different, since schiap's are trompe l'oeil and seem a little whimisical, while the deconstruction of yohji and rei was literal-actual holes/tears in the garments-and had a darker feel, at least to me.
Schiaparelli_-_Tear_Dress_.jpg

arttattler.com

skeleton dress
schiaparelli_skeleton.jpg

randomhouse.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I love the girl in post 54!:heart:

I think avant garde is a specific category in personal style..
 
Thanks for finding & posting those Schiaparelli pix, FF ... especially love the black skeleton dress. :heart: I agree, really amazing for 1938.

Looking at the arms, do you think the sleeves fall on the mannequin the way they were meant to? Really the whole thing ... it looks to me as though the mannequin is too tall for the dress.
 
known specially for hats, accessories...
How about Isabella Blow?

isabellablow3.jpg
23ksz2h.jpg


050807isblow425.jpg


hintmag.com | fernmitchell.com | vmagazine.com
 
^i was trying to find photos where the effect's not just in her hat but also in her clothes.. i only remember this one episode of FashionTV where she is running down the cobblestone street to the reporter with the camera, and there is all this colourful organza like fabric floating from her back like a cape or parachute
 
^ Maybe you can find a wedding photo ...

Isabella was interesting in that she made very unusual, eccentric choices herself, but was also a patron who helped bring the designers she believed in to more people.
 
Eccentric to me is someone like Karl Lagerfeld with his omnipresent sunglasses and hand-held fan, not Isabella Blow. As mentioned, she was a patron of experimental and innovative fashion/design, two qualities that are surely the foundation of avant garde style. I'm all for nitpicky distinctions between labels such as quirky, eccentric, original, avant garde etc. but I'm not sure these labels have substantial meaning.

Avant garde, as the term was founded, belongs to the time of modernism, and is not easily applied to or defined in our current postmodern climate. If anything, 'avant garde' has always had an uncomfortable relationship with fashion, because fashion is an industry, in addition to (arguably) being an artform. Avant garde is supposed to be in opposition to mainstream culture, but nowadays the "underground" and mainstream culture are difficult to separate, especially in the case of fashion.

For me, if I see a collection (like Margiela or Hussein Chalayan) or a person dressed strangely, and it challenges my perception of what beauty and style are, or could be, then I accept it as avant garde. I appreciate it even more if this style does not appear to follow a specific ideology or objective, as I described Petit Lucille's style.

Btw great pictures, Tata, except I think the Japanese (?) man is just wearing his traditional costume. It's still 'normal' to do that in some parts of Asia and the rest of the world. See, I am the worst of the nitpickers:blush:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,693
Messages
15,312,011
Members
89,709
Latest member
67777777
Back
Top