Eccentric to me is someone like Karl Lagerfeld with his omnipresent sunglasses and hand-held fan, not Isabella Blow. As mentioned, she was a patron of experimental and innovative fashion/design, two qualities that are surely the foundation of avant garde style. I'm all for nitpicky distinctions between labels such as quirky, eccentric, original, avant garde etc. but I'm not sure these labels have substantial meaning.
Avant garde, as the term was founded, belongs to the time of modernism, and is not easily applied to or defined in our current postmodern climate. If anything, 'avant garde' has always had an uncomfortable relationship with fashion, because fashion is an industry, in addition to (arguably) being an artform. Avant garde is supposed to be in opposition to mainstream culture, but nowadays the "underground" and mainstream culture are difficult to separate, especially in the case of fashion.
For me, if I see a collection (like Margiela or Hussein Chalayan) or a person dressed strangely, and it challenges my perception of what beauty and style are, or could be, then I accept it as avant garde. I appreciate it even more if this style does not appear to follow a specific ideology or objective, as I described
Petit Lucille's style.
Btw great pictures, Tata, except I think the Japanese (?) man is just wearing his traditional costume. It's still 'normal' to do that in some parts of Asia and the rest of the world. See, I am the worst of the nitpickers
