Double Vision F/W 2025.26 by Luigi & Iango

But they posted that the previous one was gonna be printed...i didn't see it so far...
 
I like the images, even though I knew exactly what they would ALL look like before I even opened the thread - but I don't know what Double Vision is supposed to be, other than a series of nice portrait shots that I can look through online.
 
^^^ They’ve always been this reliably one-note. These two aren’t creatively of the highest standards enough in the past to be considered lazy now— nor sharp enough to be considered pretentious LOOL And I don’t mean that in a mean way. They’ve always been very superficial in their love of glam and beauty— and the poorman's Mert & Marcus, from the very start.

I like the images, even though I knew exactly what they would ALL look like before I even opened the thread - but I don't know what Double Vision is supposed to be, other than a series of nice portrait shots that I can look through online.

Always got the impression that it’s more of a creative project with top models for brand optimization for all involved. The Double Vision imageries always remind me of model agencies comp cards.

The predictability of their style comes off expectably superficial; It’s all very gorgeous and all it’s glam: That’s it. No story. No provocation. Nothing else. And as superficial as this may be, they do it spectacularly well, and their subjects always look their best. Take a gander at the slop that’s the Essence cover with Tyra. Through no fault of hers, the lessers with unskilled and poor lighting, and messy makeup and hair, gave her the biggest mullet ever; lighting and makeup that gave her a derpy face. Double Vision is very reminiscent of Milan Vukmirovic’s Fashion for Men: Gorgeous men but so boring as a fashion publication since it never strayed from instudio shoots against a seamless formula— with nothing to say. After 300+ pages of the same setting and not a hint of storytelling, every shoot blurs into one another.
 
@Phuel Not sharp enough to be pretentious? I’m sorry, but creating a “magazine” devoted to your copy of a copy of a copy lazy photography is pretentious! This "platform" fits the definition of pretentious like a glove: "attempting to impress by affecting greater importance, talent, culture, etc., than is actually possessed."

They're lucky Meisel and Mert & Marcus cost too much for publications like Vanity Fair Italia.
 
Hopefully one day they decide it to print it...
 
I don’t know. All of these look like the catalogues you find at your hair salon.
 
It's lazy but some of the portrait shots are gorgeous. Especially love Karolina and Ida's shots.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,519
Messages
15,225,907
Members
87,373
Latest member
jrk188
Back
Top