Edward Enninful Departing British Vogue as EIC, Promoted to New Global Role within Condé Nast

My issue with VOGUE is it is all so banal; bias & basic. My reality in The Burbs is more stimulating - but maybe that’s the point. I truly miss the glamour & beauty of the lifestyle that was featured in Vogue ~ it was inspirational & breathtaking to the eye & the mind. Finally Vogue is great when it features its own cultural identity ~ celebrating Britishness is ok & probably the reason that foreigners buy foreign magazines. Personally the Timothée Chalamet issue was the death knell for me ~ so ugly :nauseated:
 
Gender neutral Vogue means the end of GQ. Must be the next move after reducing the number of issues in most of the countries (8 in this place). It's funny that the idea started a "feud" between Anna and Edward, while she put Harry Styles wearing a skirt during the pandemic. She started that trend.
 
She and Alt should have been more diverse at their time, they got their moment to open the standards, but they keep playing safe with Kate or Rianne. I don't think they are racist, those were (sadly) the times when only the fashion industry was behind the blue eyed blonde type non-stop, it was the context. That's why I love more and more Franca Sozzani, which at the same time when this was happening she was shaking the industry's rules from her chair, but always was outshined by Anna, because she was the Vogue leader of the franchise from the perspective of media and people outside fashion. Edward and Anna are the opposite from Alt and Alex, and are too obvious that the intention of being more diverse can saturate their publications. Edward's Vogue doesn't reflect that much the British cultural identity and people, it's very Hollywood sometimes and he wants to include all in the market, but the May issue was too much for me and took that as a tasteless joke from his side. Anna is diverse, but she only features rich and famous people with huge popularity. I don't know if you are diverse if you only include rich people that are part of the Club. I always bring the example of Vogue Mexico and Latin America as a diverse publication well done. Even if their covers can have its faults, there's a respect for the several identities from this part of the world, and is very effortless. Karla is one of the best editors on board now. She in the middle between the Alexes and Edwards.
Hmm…
I don’t know if I feel the same way as you about the whole thing.

‘Vogue and Fashion in it essence is exclusive. It’s supposed to portray a dream, a lifestyle a minority lives and a majority aspire to. That’s one thing. That’s what made Vogue the magazine it is, that’s what made the industry the force it is.
The issue about diversity was in the first place seeing people of colors in those spaces.

I love Vogue Paris and maybe because fashion has always been part of my life I didn’t care but there were more representation of diversity in US Vogue during Anna’s tenure than Franca, Emmanuelle, Carine and her two predecessors and even Liz and Alexandra.

You have mini-phenomenon like the Liya Kebede full issue at VP, the Black Issue of VI but to see black, Latina or Asian models in a beautiful house portraying a beautiful lifestyle, it was mostly in the US that we have to look up to.

Why IG is so popular, because we have that idea of diversity and people being able to portray a certain idea of an upscale lifestyle…Most of the time without the panache of a great photographer or editor but it still works.

I think Franca had other challenges than the 3 others main Vogue. Italy is the smallest market so from the start, she had to scream louder than everybody else to make her voice matter. She was a genius and she understood what she had to do.
Her irreverence made her Vogue. After her, it was done for VI. Nostalgia made us all root for the title to have a voice again.

Alexandra and Emmanuelle never realized that they had brands on their hands. When I read for example Alexandra talk about the Vogue Fashion Night Out, I’m a bit on the fence. It’s true, it wasn’t interesting for the brands. I was working in the industry at that time and it didn’t made sense for the brands to do that (a lot of money thrown for what?) but it did in a sense showed the interest for fashion and the power of attraction of the name « Vogue ».

It was Alexandra’s mission to see how to turn that failure and figure out what to do with it.

‘In Paris, the same. Emmanuelle did it but continued to operate on a small scale while her aesthetic influenced all the brands in the contemporary market.

Antoine Arnault was clever to launch « Les Journées du Patrimoine » after that. It created a connection with LVMH and the public.

‘Diversity is one thing but you have to think about the magazine as a brand and insert yourself as part of the branding of that entity.

‘I can say it now, Alexandra is a better EIC than Edward. And it’s not even for discussion because he is a stylist at heart. Her Vogue made sense for that market but he understood that his voice was smaller than the other English-speaking US version. And so he became a brand himself. A but like Franca in a way…

I don’t know if you guys can find 10 interviews of Alexandra on YouTube. I don’t even think Emmanuelle has appeared on TV ever. Let alone done interviews others than the little reviews Loic Prigent used to do with them back in the days for Vogue.FR

We talk about the Met Gala but there are fashion exhibitions every other day in Paris and London. Where was Vogue?

I’m sorry but Emmanuelle didn’t do enough to make VP a title that mattered. Out of all the Vogue that had folded, VP is the one that should have remained untouched. That was a magazine that was influential in a substantial way in what people consume at one point. And that was the home edition of the biggest advertisers in the industry.
 
Edward is 100% and will always be a stylist first, I thought we would get to see major fashion eds/ cover stories since we know he's capable of doing so and fell flat. He would rather rotate the same celebs/models use the same team he's been working with since God knows how long and give us nothing. I just hope whoever takes this "Head of Editorial Content' role (whatever that really means) gives us FASHION

Also who are the HECs in Europe going back to now?
 
I'm shocked this news made it into the covers of some English newspapers. They really care about fashion! I agree with Alex saying that Edward labeled her as the "racist b***h editor" any time he was explaining his different pont of view in media. She should had say something at the time, but she didn't help herself either.

note which papers the coverage that's actually critical of EE are in, though - the Times, Telegraph (both conservative newspapers with paywalls so the t-app - i.e. tumblr, twitter, tiktok - riffraff doesn't have the wherewithal to bully them) and Alexandra Shulman's piece is in the Mail+ i.e. an offshoot of the Daily Mail. The Guardian reporting things like the plans to make Vogue "gender-neutral" though? Now that would be a surprise.

(and don't even get me started on him saying "femininity is outdated". How utterly insulting to your readers, a fair chunk of whom are presumably feminine women - the type of people who'd actually buy your fashion magazine!)

and I should start this off by reiterating that I loved his work at i-D and had really high hopes that he'd bring something fresh to Vogue, visually as well as diversity-wise. Those hopes.....have not been borne out, and I say that as someone who actually bought physical copies of his issues at first. Alex Shulman and Lucinda Chambers are not in the wrong to feel ill-used by their portrayal/treatment at his hands and in the media, and that's despite my opinion that Vogue in the early 2010s really did need a shake-up, AS still ran that ship ably for two decades and brought out a lot of incredible editorials - she could have maybe started doing them with more non-white models a bit sooner for the sake of freshness alone. And I'd still take any of her issues as editor over "Activist Vogue", like....please, people aren't buying magazines to be lectured at and scolded, they want yours for pretty clothes and creativity so show some? If your magazine is a glorified shopping list, at least provide the fantasy to make that appealing!
 
If Mark is living in London maybe he will be HEC , he’s too close to Anna
 
This just isn’t true though is it - plenty of Asian women also got covers but go off
I mean, it kind of is. The sixth months so far of 2023 had 4 out of 6 covers with Black models (one model of Indian ancestry -- Priyanka Chopra Jonas; and one white model, Miley Cyrus). Not saying that this is good or bad, just that there is validity to the statement.
 
^But he only featured Gemma Chang and a few asian models in the 2018 fold-out. After that he didn't featured an East Asian girl on the cover, even during the current Korean wave. I'm curious to see after the last issue a thread with all his covers and make a final judgement on his Vogue.
 
\And I'd still take any of her issues as editor over "Activist Vogue", like....please, people aren't buying magazines to be lectured at and scolded, they want yours for pretty clothes and creativity so show some? If your magazine is a glorified shopping list, at least provide the fantasy to make that appealing!

This is what I find so annoying about fashion magazines these days. Why are these people, in one of the most elitist fields to exist, lecturing ME about diversity and inclusion? It's easier for the powerbrokers in fashion to act like the solution to diversity is just telling me to be inclusive! If I wanted to be lectured I'd go buy Adbusters. They have all the enthusiasm of a first year political science student. I don't want to be lectured on ANYTHING by Vogue. Vogue and Harper's Bazaar (for example) used to be pretty literary, why not go back to those roots and support BIPOC, LGBTQ, etc. whatever writers by even publishing excerpts of their work like they used to. Why not do great profiles of upcoming artists, writers, actors, etc. like they used to? Except... be diverse about it.

I get more fantasy from vintage fashion magazines than anything modern ones offer.
 
As has been mentioned before, everyone has their own views regarding diversity, and what constitutes the ideal approach, so it's impossible to please everyone.

Perhaps not now, but for a long while, the Asian representation seen in Vogue felt like an afterthought, even though they are the largest minority group in the UK. In many ways, Edward's Vogue felt more oriented towards the world of an American audience, rather than the one within Britain.

Anyhow, if I am to be lectured about the world via the medium of fashion, please let a woman do it next time. It's like wondering who the next Doctor Who is going to be, and the makers of the show realising they're getting a message across, but the last time it was entertaining for everyone was some while ago.
 
Another fact: I counted 20 Meisel issues from December 2017 to this month. It's not that much in six years.
 
I remain very unclear on if there will be an actual EIC replacement and wtf he's going to be doing going forward.
 
On WWD there is an article about it but only for subscribers….
 
On WWD there is an article about it but only for subscribers….

Is it this: The March 2024 Issue of British Vogue Will Be Edward Enninful’s Last – WWD ?
It's readable to me but there's nothing new

The March 2024 Issue of British Vogue Will Be Edward Enninful’s Final One
Enninful updated followers about his final issues, and last few months as editor in chief of British Vogue.

THE FINAL COUNTDOWN: Edward Enninful’s final issue as editor in chief of British Vogue will be March 2024, according to an Instagram post.

Enninful, who is taking on two new roles at Condé Nast, confirmed that he is working on his remaining seven issues.

He urged followers to “set your clocks” as he counts down to the March 2024 issue, and asked them to name their favorite issues of British Vogue during his tenure.

In the Instagram post, he said the issues between now and March will involve “brilliant global change makers. The unbeatable creativity of the U.K. And above all FASHION! More than anything, I am just so excited for what is still to come in the next seven months.”

As reported, Enninful will take on the new position of global creative and cultural adviser at Vogue. He will also become editorial adviser at British Vogue. Separately, Enninful will work on projects and causes outside of the Vogue and Condé stable.

In his Vogue and Condé roles, Enninful will continue to report to Anna Wintour, who is global chief content officer for Condé Nast, and editor in chief of American Vogue.

Neither Condé Nast nor Enninful has specified what the two new roles will involve. Enninful has not clarified what the new projects, outside of Condé, will be.

Enninful is also helping to hunt for a head of editorial content for British Vogue, who will look after the day-to-day of the magazine.

Condé’s decision to hire an editorial content head is aimed at bringing British Vogue in line with the overall group’s new management structure, where content is shared globally and editors in chief are a thing of the past.

Enninful took over as editor in chief of British Vogue in August 2017 and in December 2020 was promoted to European editorial director of Vogue.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,534
Messages
15,188,234
Members
86,414
Latest member
soysauceftw
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->