i dont know what editors have said they didn't like it...
...
everyone i know thinks givenchy is super cool...
just really unaffordable...
i mean...
just look how popular the bags are...
if editors didn't like tisci's work they wouldn't be carrying the bags...
what i think is the actual complaint that editors have is what you just showed...
it's always the same...
...
I think AGiles is referring to the unpleasant reviews his debut Spring RTW collection received.
"PARIS, October 5, 2005 – There's only one way to sum up what went on at Givenchy: It was painful. First, the drag of crossing traffic-clogged Paris at rush hour, followed by an interminable wait for the show to begin. Then the pretentious presentation: android-faced women circling endlessly in a white space, trussed up in skirts and dresses so constricting it looked like a special form of cruelty to models. This was Riccardo Tisci's first stab at Givenchy ready-to-wear, and it was a perplexing move both for the designer and the brand, which has been troubled by several swerves in direction over the past few years. From what was possible to ascertain about Tisci's style, when glimpsed at Givenchy's couture show in July, a kind of gothic romanticism might have been expected. That was nowhere to be seen in this collection, which, with its bandaged, below-the-knee hobble skirts and relentlessly seamed, formfitting jersey dresses, was more an homage to the eighties heyday of Azzedine Alaïa and Thierry Mugler, treading on heavily ugly block-heel shoes.
The confusion here is as much to do with what Givenchy means to the world at large as it is about the difficult contrivances of Tisci's designs. SinceHubert de Givenchy launched his first collection as a few simple staples to get a woman through her everyday life (a trench, a pair of pants, a black turtleneck, an LBD, and so on), the brand has, in recent times, swung from Alexander McQueen's dominatrix severity to Julien Macdonald's unbridled bling. With Tisci in the hot seat, there's yet another change of gear going on—one that seems diametrically opposed to the approachable, commercial image presented by Liv Tyler in the company's fragrance advertising. Essentially, that leaves Givenchy facing the same question as it was when McQueen arrived: At exactly what kind of woman is it aimed? This nerve-grating collection didn't provide any kind of answer." -Sarah Mower for style.com
"Strange as it may sound, Mr. Tisci seems to suffer from an excess of talent and enthusiasm. He is like a little boy in a candy shop, and the candy shop is Givenchy, with its history of glamour and tailoring. Mr. Tisci got a little carried away with the tailoring, sending out trumpet skirts in misjudged proportions and metallic leather hot pants with gladiator belts. White cotton shirts were beautiful.
Mr. Tisci had many fine pieces, but they didn't come together. And it wasn't clear from his alien-looking models whether this was his female ideal.
He has a lot of good ideas, but he doesn't need to obscure them with overwrought couture effects, fake modern backdrops and clunky white shoes that scream, "Nurse!"" -Cathy Horyn from nyt.com
I didn't mind it in 2005 but I'm awfully bored now.