LibertyRose
memoirs of a...
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2004
- Messages
- 2,780
- Reaction score
- 8
Not sure how long this thread can continue considering that the discussion has veered away from the actual collection, but I hardly sympathize with Cathy Horyn and find what Slimane said about her to be quite right. What Slimane is responding to is not just Horyn's negative review but her bias, which he perceives to be deep-rooted and consistent. And Horyn herself is at fault for feuding such a perception--mere weeks ago she wrote about the artistic rivalry between Simons and Slimane, which many TFSers dismissed as manufactured to sell newspapers. Well, she's delivered her verdict now, though who'd win is a foregone conclusion given her well-documented and obvious bias towards Simons. This is how a writer creates bad drama. As an observer, I do think she enjoys the power she has and is guilty of abusing it to promote her favorites.
And her review of the actual collection is unprofessionally written. A writer who devotes half of her piece to explain or vent why she was banned reeks of self-aggrandizement. And I strongly feel that she downplayed why her criticism provoked Slimane, which has the effect of making him look irrational. That she did not use catty language did not make her better, in my opinion. She knows full well that if she does that in the capacity of a journalist she'd be fired immediately and hence loses her only outlet to be heard. So she got crafty. The final line in her review about how YSL's competitors are having a terrific season proves my point. I get the impression that she likes grading and ranking designers more than writing about their work.
Meanwhile, I do find Slimane's reaction to be catty but kind of delicious. I find more and more that the public expects public figures to exhibit no negative emotions when under personal attack, which is unnatural. I disagree that his expression of anger should damage his standing in the industry, which hails Naomi Campbell as one of the greatest personalities afterall.
And her review of the actual collection is unprofessionally written. A writer who devotes half of her piece to explain or vent why she was banned reeks of self-aggrandizement. And I strongly feel that she downplayed why her criticism provoked Slimane, which has the effect of making him look irrational. That she did not use catty language did not make her better, in my opinion. She knows full well that if she does that in the capacity of a journalist she'd be fired immediately and hence loses her only outlet to be heard. So she got crafty. The final line in her review about how YSL's competitors are having a terrific season proves my point. I get the impression that she likes grading and ranking designers more than writing about their work.
Meanwhile, I do find Slimane's reaction to be catty but kind of delicious. I find more and more that the public expects public figures to exhibit no negative emotions when under personal attack, which is unnatural. I disagree that his expression of anger should damage his standing in the industry, which hails Naomi Campbell as one of the greatest personalities afterall.
Last edited by a moderator: