Nope, none of them had a cover before Gwyneth.I have watched 3 episodes & it’s boring. I feel I’m watching a documentary on how we ruined Vogue - you can see it on Hamish Bowles & Grace Coddington’s faces & in their tone of voice. Gwyneth Paltrow’s comment that she started the celebrity covers of Vogue is incredulous. I’m pretty sure Julia Roberts; Demi Moore; Julia Ormond; Michelle Pfeiffer; Kim Basinger; Winona Ryder; Sharon Stone & Geena Davis had covers prior to Gwyneth in the 90s. Also that’s not to mention the actresses like Elizabeth Taylor; Cher; Farrah Fawcett et al from previous decades that had multiple covers.
My own personal opinion is Vogue went downhill somewhere in the late nineties & this documentary is just giving credence to my views & the reasons why.
Nope, none of them had a cover before Gwyneth. |
I totally agree with your comment. I would even contend that Heather Locklear (Melrose Place); Gillian Anderson (x Files) & Jennifer Aniston (Friends) were bigger celebrities then Gwyneth. She just happened to be dating Brad Pitt & that is what catapulted her ahead of the rest. Same with Nicole Kidman - married to Tom Cruise. Even Drew Barrymore & Teri Hatcher (Lois & Clark) were bigger stars then Gwyneth at the time. I remember when Uma Thurman wore a lavender Prada dress at the 1995 Oscars - this is when people started to take note of the red carpet & what actress’ wore.It's an interesting bit of revisionism, perhaps the approach is - repeat the idea often enough and it'll become truth in the minds of other people.
It relies on people thinking that Sharon Stone, Demi Moore and Julia Roberts had no star power whatsoever in the early 90s, and that supermodels themselves didn't have media fame on the level of minor celebrities...
Supreme Models - it’s on Vogue’s YouTube channel.At least they didn't make up covers, what was that documentary recently where they (the filmmakers/not Vogue, I don't think it was a documentary affiliated with Vogue) made fake Vogue/magazine covers to prove their point? Does anyone remember the documentary I'm thinking of? I can't remember it.
It's too bad we'd never get a documentary series about Vogue in other decades, pre-Anna, when it was more interesting. Anna, Anna, Anna!!
For those alive, what was it like when the supermodels era ended by 95/96? To me, it feels like they were still in their primes until 1999.I totally agree with your comment. I would even contend that Heather Locklear (Melrose Place); Gillian Anderson (x Files) & Jennifer Aniston (Friends) were bigger celebrities then Gwyneth. She just happened to be dating Brad Pitt & that is what catapulted her ahead of the rest. Same with Nicole Kidman - married to Tom Cruise. Even Drew Barrymore & Teri Hatcher (Lois & Clark) were bigger stars then Gwyneth at the time. I remember when Uma Thurman wore a lavender Prada dress at the 1995 Oscars - this is when people started to take note of the red carpet & what actress’ wore.
The supermodels were in their own lane but by 95/96 the era had gone - IMHO.
For me they simply over exposed themselves & I as a consumer moved on. I backpacked through Europe in 1994 & Claudia Schiffer was everywhere - billboards; magazine covers; adverts etc & I remember being so bored by it all. The other moment for me was when VOGUE was telling me that Kylie Bax ; Shalom Harlow & Liz Hurley were supermodels - I don’t think so. The fabulousness was gone for me & the era was a memory. I stopped buying magazines in 1996 because of this.For those alive, what was it like when the supermodels era ended by 95/96? To me, it feels like they were still in their primes until 1999.
That's so interesting to hear from someone who actually lived it. Because we know those in the industry does a lot of revisionism on the 90s Supermodels era but never tell the truth as to why it ended by the mid 90s. By then, actresses/singers started taking over models jobs!For me they simply over exposed themselves & I as a consumer moved on. I backpacked through Europe in 1994 & Claudia Schiffer was everywhere - billboards; magazine covers; adverts etc & I remember being so bored by it all. The other moment for me was when VOGUE was telling me that Kylie Bax ; Shalom Harlow & Liz Hurley were supermodels - I don’t think so. The fabulousness was gone for me & the era was a memory. I stopped buying magazines in 1996 because of this.
"I’d even say that they evolved to perfectly adapt to the darker aesthetic, higher concept of the mid and late-90s that has come to define the still relevant highest standards." - Can you explain more what you mean by this?^^^ Being an impressionable teen in the 90s— and Clueless was exactly like my high school life, with a dash of Kids thrown in, we rolled our eyes at the “Supers” phenomenon and the commercialism of it all: The calendars, the movies and MTV series (LMFAO @Cindy’s movie and her House of Style), Model Cafe etc etc. I’d compare the experience of the “Supers” to a cool artist like Rihanna performing as the Halftime Show: It’s very commercialized for public consumption and a tacky Siegfried & Roy spectacle.
After the phenomenon passed, I’d even say that they evolved to perfectly adapt to the darker aesthetic, higher concept of the mid and late-90s that has come to define the still relevant highest standards. Except for Cindy, the others shed their “Super” pop image and became more iconic for it.