Lindsay Lohan

[Erin]

love the dress...
she needs a tan

Nobody needs a tan...

 

[Emilee]

No no, she doesn't need a tan! When she "gets a tan" it means she goes orange and we don't want that!

 

[ladyflash]

Definitely not her skin that's the problem.

 

[beb415]

did anyone id her clutch yet? Ah, i am dying to know.

Actually, I found it on the Barney's website and it's by Lanvin.

 

[LegsXI]

yeah, imo no tan for her!

 

[casaanova]

Well here's her sparkly Mathew Williamson dress in the runway version...of course, it looks better on the model. I think Lindsay could have worked it better if she hadn't worn the tights, but I guess it's too cold in NYC to go tight-less.

I would have liked to see her maybe in something like this...even with the shoe. She would have looked elegant, and well, it's not necessary to wear mini-dresses all the time Linds, no matter how great your legs are.

both from style.com

 

[Magnus]

Lindsay Lohan out paying a visit to Samantha Ronson’s house (February 17).




celebrity-gossip.net

 

[MeCari]

x17online

 

[wings]

^on the last picture her boobs really don´t look nice

 

[Magnus]

Well, she's not wearing a bra

 

[*TRUSTtheGIRLS*]

those look huuuuge

 

[XxpinktinksxX]

Definitely not her skin that's the problem.

Yep sadly...

 

[Emilee]

celebutopia

 

[Emilee]

same

 

[Carrme]

I don't like her makeup at Mathew Williamson's store opening. I like her better with no make-up- but I love the dress

 

[loonaka]

those look huuuuge

My thoughts exactly

 

[redhotfuss]

i think she looks gorgeous in the sparkly dress at matthew williamson... i love the whole outfit. and i love it with black tights..

 

[dumbfairy]

Those boobs could take someones eyes out. I don't think she looks too great at Matthew Williamson

 

[Magnus]

HQs


celebritycity

 

[Magnus]

same.