Louis Vuitton Handbag Questions (December 2003 - November 2010)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just a quick but important question - I have a Vuitton Sac Rabat Dalmatian and a Vuitton Monogram Velours Trompe l'oeil Trocadero both of which I personally purchased from the LV flagship on the Champs Elysees, Paris. I am curious to know where or if there is a date or code embossed inside these bags because I am at a loss to find them? I also have a Cherry Blossom Papilion which also has no date code. These bags are without question authentic but this date code thing is it fact or fiction???

i think there should be date codes. they're hard to spot sometimes. like my epi pochette is just stamped on the lining while other my other bag have tags instead. i'm not sure of those models though.. try asking the champs elysees Paris store? :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chic Chick, I think the Pochette MM might be a bit big anyway. And, um, there might be a teeny bit of clash.. :blink: :lol:

I was wondering about clash when deciding which Cles to get, as I'd read on TPF of others doing the Agenda/Cles thing for organiser/wallet, and absolutely loved the idea. I got the Damier in the end as the Cles would stay mostly on the inside, so would look great against the red. My other option was a Vernis Pomme (too red-on-red inside, but would look great if I left it outside); or Mono Cerises, which I decided against simply because I thought Damier in and out was smarter. The clash thing is a hard question, even for mono/damier, which are the same colours anyway!

i went thru that whole thinking process too! :blush: but i decided on the multicolore coz i think it'll look nice hanging on the outside of the red epi speedy but now i'm not so sure... :lol: coz i want my pastilles keychain to hand there too.. LoL..
 
I'll ask this on TPF if you like, Grill. Those LV experts know everything!!! :shock:

Thanks FrankieP. I actually found the date code on my Dalmatian bag. So fiddly and hidden! I did post of the TPF afterwards, but I kind of prefer here as people seem friendlier. :( I've never given a fig about date codes before as I've only ever bought Vuitton from Vuitton so no worries about authenticity. However, I am thinking of perhaps parting with some of my beloved bags and I know that things like date codes are make or break on the dreaded Ebay:shock:.
 
^ yes! that's the store i Q-ed at! n ppl passing by was asking the LV doorman if there were any reason why we'd be doing that... LoL... :D did u buy anything? i came out with 3! :blush:

yup! bought epi speedy in red and a damier belt. ;)
 
^ we bought the same thing Ocalorie! about a mth ago i bought the red epi speedy there! it's 25 size :) and about 2 week ago i went there again n bought 2 LV denim (baggy n mini pleaty) n the epi red pochette for the speedy! the pochette great as it fits in the speedy comfortably. plus i'm using it as a make up or evening or breaks to cafe during work when i don't want to carry a big bag :) it's a great "investment" that's always my excuse to hub... ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
^;)
is it true that the green baggy GM was already discontinued? i called dubai lv shops, singapore, and hongkong and they said the same thing.
is the blue denim (baggy gm) worth buying?
 
These are fakes!!

When you buy fakes you are funding terrorism and child labor!

Think about it folks, if you cant afford don't fight it.

COACH is an all American luggage company that will one day be the American Version of the Louis Vuitton. There less expensive just like Vuitton was when it first started to sell in the 1800s.


WTF?!?:shock:

im sorry but i have to wholeheartedly disagree with you on coach. half the stuff that comes out of coach is tacky as hell (coach crayons?) and they are the equivalent of (and main competition for also not so great, but definately tacky american lable, dooney and bourke) and i am affraid to alert you that many many coach products are MANUFACTURED IN CHINA! darlin'. sorry to burst your bubble, but do some research before yah get all crazy...:stuart:
 
^^ ocalorie - i just wanted something casual. of all the women's bag choices i was looking for 1. accessibility (good pocket on the outside for mobile, keys n mints and i love the front zipped pocket for make up and just wallet in the main compartment) :) its just so casual it complements most of my outfit. yea, i know the price is too much for denim but i guess it's only worth it if you find that it'll can suit your lifestyle :) i'm not sure if the green's discontinued i didn't ask coz i thought green n pink r strange for a denim bag so i never asked. :blush:

^jun3 - :lol: coach will be the next Louis vuitton :rofl: coach = kmart of all luxe bags :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
^ Lol @ Jun's reply to Mota's post.. it's like Target presenting a collection at Fashion Week.. 'cos even LV started off cheaper, right?! :lol: ^_^
 
i think there should be date codes. they're hard to spot sometimes. like my epi pochette is just stamped on the lining while other my other bag have tags instead. i'm not sure of those models though.. try asking the champs elysees Paris store? :)

thanks for your feedback! :flower: I located both date codes myself - quite hard though - they were printed on the lining material and inside the interior pockets. Thanks
 
WTF?!?:shock:

im sorry but i have to wholeheartedly disagree with you on coach. half the stuff that comes out of coach is tacky as hell (coach crayons?) and they are the equivalent of (and main competition for also not so great, but definately tacky american lable, dooney and bourke) and i am affraid to alert you that many many coach products are MANUFACTURED IN CHINA! darlin'. sorry to burst your bubble, but do some research before yah get all crazy...:stuart:


Well "darling" so it seems that the only thing that runs through you head is the popularity of a status bag! I am talking about Coach b.c there is a revolution going on in The Coach house in the United States. Its an old American brand trying to achive what it was meant to be. Be a luxury brand the same way Vuitton was once a struggling brand. Vuitton has a legacy and through the years so can Coach!. Be intelectual this a Fashion furum for people who talk Fashion not ignorance or stupidity about a bag that plays no important role in your life. It has no income to dont worry about it. ^_^
 
Another nonsensical post from Moto.

Jun's reply wasn't based upon the popularity of the bags, she was replying to your delusion of Coach grandeur - perhaps Vuitton was once struggling, but I'm sure they were never made in China, and their legacy is not one based upon cheap manufacturing in sweatshops!! Perhaps this Great Revolution currently sweeping through the Coach House of the United States could start with bringing their manufacturing home, employing US workers rather than cheap Chinese labour, and producing items of a quality worth collecting. Darling.
 
Well "darling" so it seems that the only thing that runs through you head is the popularity of a status bag! I am talking about Coach b.c there is a revolution going on in The Coach house in the United States. Its an old American brand trying to achive what it was meant to be. Be a luxury brand the same way Vuitton was once a struggling brand. Vuitton has a legacy and through the years so can Coach!. Be intelectual this a Fashion furum for people who talk Fashion not ignorance or stupidity about a bag that plays no important role in your life. It has no income to dont worry about it. ^_^

Um, okay, well since you replied, i will too. I just cant help myself this time:innocent:

Believe me, popularity is IN NO WAY EVER an issue with my handbag choices. I make handbags, as well as buy them, and quality and longevity is a key factor in any product I purchase. The fact that LV bags are status bags doesn't phase me at all. They are quality products and are popular because they are so well made and practical. The trend of popularizing monogramed bags was something that exploded into the mainstream in the late 1990's, in a great way because of celebrity worship. To so many more, the LV monogram, the damier print, are icons of quality, longevity and timelessness.....and not about popularity.

You for one, since you're speaking of discussing in an 'intelectual' matter, should be the last one to jump to conclusions and assume I buy LV bags for status. That is one of the biggest stereotypes about LV owners and obviously, you believe the stereotype. I find your statement to be very ignorant, because your very first statement was incorrect from the get-go. Please let me refresh:

"These are fakes!!

When you buy fakes you are funding terrorism and child labor!

Think about it folks, if you cant afford don't fight it.

COACH is an all American luggage company that will one day be the American Version of the Louis Vuitton. There less expensive just like Vuitton was when it first started to sell in the 1800s." --mota3089


The bag you were making a statement about was no a fake. That is a bold comment to make outright if you have no clue what your talking about. Obviously you are not very familiar with the brand, nor authentic bags either.

Yes, you are partially correct when you state you are funding child labor and terrorism through fake handbags, but I cant help but think that that statement sounds like regeritated reteric from a Harpers Bazzarr editorial. They are the main magazine that linked counterfeiting to terrorism, and did not provide very many facts to support the point of their article, with the exception of a vague counterfeit bust in new york, yet many many people now create that association because of one magazine article.

Yes, Coach is an american company, although they outsource a large majority of their labor to CHINA, much like Dooney and Bourke, using substandard labor and underpaid their workers. Face it, Coach mass produces a ton of bags and accessories, differing each season and the quality of bags now-a-days is far less superior to the original Coach bags manufactured when the company first began making bags. Since the 80's, there has been a quality decline in their bags. That statement is like saying Old Navy is an american brand, and one day they will become luxury....

I have nothing against coach bags. But when comparing them to a brand like Louis Vuitton, there are drastic differences in the companies, the way they market, and their product quality.

Yes, you are correct Louis Vuitton cost far less than they do now, but one cannot account for over 100 years of inflation, now can they? :lol:

Louis Vuitton bags are still made by hand, their manufacturing process is faster than is was decades ago, yet they still maintain the integrity of their craft. Coach on the otherhand, outsources cheap labor and the quality control over their bags is no where near that of Louis Vuiton.

'll leave it at that. The facts. And not go into detail on decyphering misconstrewed sentences, mispellings and whatnot.
 
Another nonsensical post from Moto.

Jun's reply wasn't based upon the popularity of the bags, she was replying to your delusion of Coach grandeur - perhaps Vuitton was once struggling, but I'm sure they were never made in China, and their legacy is not one based upon cheap manufacturing in sweatshops!! Perhaps this Great Revolution currently sweeping through the Coach House of the United States could start with bringing their manufacturing home, employing US workers rather than cheap Chinese labour, and producing items of a quality worth collecting. Darling.


you ROCK, frankiep! One of the US's main flaws is the growing unemployment of US citizens and the increased oursourcing internationally for cheap labor. karma!!
 
Thanks, Jun. It's a similar problem here.. so-called "Proud Australian" companies designing and producing stuff, but then out-sourcing it to overseas workers. It not only smacks of exploitation, but it's also just plain idiotic - when we do have unemployed, and we're designing some great Aussie stuff, why not get it made here too. It'll cost a little more but we'll more happily buy the product, and then of course their manufacturing costs stay in the country rather than supporting someplace else. Grr.
 
You seem to definitely have the knowledge of what goes on at Louis Vuitton , but if you were ever to launch your own line of accessories circa now. How do you suppose you will find the artistry to develop a hand made bag when in fact you will not have the funding to do so. What makes you actually believe that every exact piece is hand crafted at Louis Vuitton, from the shoes to the infamous bags?

You actually believe that the video presented to you in there online website is actually accurate?
It is the year 2007 people want things fast! In addition, the only one name you can call true artistry and a bag that requires a lot of time to produce is the Hermes. There is a waiting list for whichever bag you desire such as The Kelly and The Birkin.

A brand needs mass produced things such as products produced in China or else where such as India and South America. These mass produced products are the things that keep a company a float no matter what product it is. Why do you think many designers have secondary lines? Because the things they call art are too expensive. Selling to the masses is the key, not making something so unobtainable that it makes it desirable to people who cannot afford it. Then we wonder why there is world hunger! Because there is poor circulation of capital, People are too busy spending on things they believe are luxury goods when in fact they are not.

I was in deed referencing Harpers article and I did because that article caught my eye and attention just like everyone else. You are someone I am definitely looking foward to seeing someday in the field, you seem to have that knowledge that throws people off. Just like you did to me. :flower:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,794
Messages
15,199,277
Members
86,806
Latest member
highendhomo
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->