Models Who Aren't That Tall | Page 116 | the Fashion Spot

Models Who Aren't That Tall

I think Hannah was 17 when that pic was taken....she will be 19 in May so, she has definately grown!




really?? she really doesn't seem so tall...
And I have the souvenir that she's smaller than erin... I don't know maybe I'm wrong.
 
Not always. I grew an inch this year, and I just turned 20. But I think it is more usual to pretty much have stopped growing when you are 16-ish.
 
Yeah, I also grew an inch in the past year and I just turned 20.

And I'm pretty sure Hannah Davis was listed as 5'8 1/2" when she first started modeling. That was when she was 14 and she's like 19 now so I highly doubt she's under 5'8".
 
Yea, Funny the motivation ....



;5668299]Something tells me Natalia V isn't very tall..... :innocent:[/QUOTE]
 
Angela Lindvall is not 180cm at all...she is 175
either Anja rubik.
they look tall,cause the scaring high heels and their skinny bodies
 
what I was wondering about is how do clients react when they realize that a girl is way shorter than she is listed on her card?Do they even care?
 
Angela Lindvall is not 180cm at all...she is 175
either Anja rubik.
they look tall,cause the scaring high heels and their skinny bodies

i can't say on angela, but are you sure on anja? i've seen her in person and she is tall :o yes yes, tall with hight heels :rolleyes:, that's for sure. but a tower anyway! same for michaela kocianova or kim noorda, they are TALL
 
what I was wondering about is how do clients react when they realize that a girl is way shorter than she is listed on her card?Do they even care?
I guess they don't notice, or don't care... In print work you won't realize a girl's height
 
I know girls that have been sent back to the agency fast! Others get away with it because they have the look and it doesn't matter...


what I was wondering about is how do clients react when they realize that a girl is way shorter than she is listed on her card?Do they even care?
 
Oh well... all that speculation will never end until we really go up to one of these girls and actually measure them :rolleyes: Estimating (especially when it comes to height) is always quite tricky. Not to mention that from pics only it's almost impossible to tell how tall/ short someone really is.

But one thing I have been wondering about aswell is indeed how clients react when there's (let's take Agyness for example) 1.77 written on her comp card but in fact she's about 1.73 :blink: I mean...4cm make quite a difference IMO.
 

But one thing I have been wondering about aswell is indeed how clients react when there's (let's take Agyness for example) 1.77 written on her comp card but in fact she's about 1.73 :blink: I mean...4cm make quite a difference IMO.
4 cm is not a huge difference, I remember Felicity Gilbert who, I heard, is barely 170 (she was listed at 167 in her London agency if I am not wrong) having a showcard and it said 178, now that's a difference :shock:
 
^that is insane :shock:
Same with Luca Gadjus and Sasha P.
There were times when they were listed as 5'10, although they are both around 5'7, if not shorter.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,328
Messages
15,296,695
Members
89,270
Latest member
kblagodatskikh
Back
Top