D
Deleted member 7575
Guest
nycgirl84 said:but when people pay $15,000 for an item that came off the runway or out of a boutique yesterday - not a vintage kimono or a 17th-century ball gown or a spacesuit worn on mars by the world's first one-legged astronaut - i think they've got their priorities a bit screwed up, personally. there isn't anything you can do to that bag, or that dress, to make it actually translate into $15,000 worth of *anything,* especially when that money could be so much better invested. it seems like a kind of obscene and infantile narcissism, like bathing in an olympic-sized pool of champagne, just because you *can*. i tried to understand it, and i failed.
meme
Yeah, that makes sense in most cases, I too believe.[/QUOTE]
15,000 for a 17th century ball gown is way underpriced.
While I would have a hard time spending 15,000 on a garment I respect other's decision to do so. Artwork, cars, and jewlery all demand even higher prices than that but no one thinks twice about it.