The discussion of why some brands can
"make it" and others don't in another thread make me look at some offerings from promising young designers. Here is a selection from Aaron Esh, whose whole stick is to be the new Helmut Lang with a very "
serious" NewYorkLate90sConcreteAndLeather-offering. Well, I don't about you, but I personally don't find it very "sexy" or "modern" to have a pair of 600€ trousers that makes it look like my *** is stuffed with two Nokia phones because the pocket facing is pushing through the fabric (among many, many, many other construction
AND production errors). Same goes for the chestpocket on a 900€ waistcoat. And that lapel on this 1000€ blazer... If on the e-com sites the pieces already look like they were made this horribly (and I don't use that lightly, but this really looks like amateur work), you really have to wonder what they would look like worn, you know, like you do with clothes usually... But maybe that's his idea of sexy? That the clothes look so bad that you want to rip them off immediately? Sorry, but having Katy England on your team does not a fashion brand make...
View attachment 1332129 View attachment 1332130 View attachment 1332131