D
Deleted member 7575
Guest
nycgirl84 said:but when people pay $15,000 for an item that came off the runway or out of a boutique yesterday - not a vintage kimono or a 17th-century ball gown or a spacesuit worn on mars by the world's first one-legged astronaut - i think they've got their priorities a bit screwed up, personally. there isn't anything you can do to that bag, or that dress, to make it actually translate into $15,000 worth of *anything,* especially when that money could be so much better invested. it seems like a kind of obscene and infantile narcissism, like bathing in an olympic-sized pool of champagne, just because you *can*. i tried to understand it, and i failed.
meme
Yeah, that makes sense in most cases, I too believe.[/QUOTE]
15,000 for a 17th century ball gown is way underpriced.
While I would have a hard time spending 15,000 on a garment I respect other's decision to do so. Artwork, cars, and jewlery all demand even higher prices than that but no one thinks twice about it.


and it cost like $90 over here at the water shops in HK. The sneakers have held up fine considering they're my everyday sneaks, but needless to say i'm never buying anything from Bape again.


...more of a sicence person! lol! anyway....totally agree with dsquared! always seeing a lot of people wearing dsquared from head to toe. money down the drain if you ask me!