ModernLove7
Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2005
- Messages
- 521
- Reaction score
- 0
more Newton picture
yves saint laurent
in 1971
![Work2_400.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.stern.de%2F_content%2F20%2F66%2F206601%2FWork2_400.jpg&hash=cfbaf754ca83b776e9096f35a279d08e)
![Newton10.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.photoscape.ru%2Fmisc%2Fimg_pictures%2FNewton10.jpg&hash=af890a3bf3bc942d19bceb51eb29fa75)
yves saint laurent
![yves_saint_laurent_1971.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tinypineapple.com%2Fbookshelf%2Fimages%2Fyves_saint_laurent_1971.jpg&hash=5a46a7bf4fd2562758152af3f0bb3f90)
in 1971
Live Streaming... The F/W 2025.26 Fashion Shows
lady grey said:second row, far right, who is that headless model??
those are all herb ritts?
missy-t1 said:If you wanted to be a catwalk model but without the boob flashing you could go on Prada as Prada clothes are so modest and I've never seen a boob on the runway!
no, presbyterianmissy-t1 said:Isn't Helmut Newton a pervert?
maybe it's meant to be ironic?jssy4eva said:it's kind of ironic, when you think about naked ads for CLOTHING companies...does that not defeat the whole purpose????
I don't know, but I do think it's kinda funny.morgan38 said:maybe it's meant to be ironic?
Am I missing something? I don't get the jokeberkeleygrrrl said:no, presbyterian