Phoebe Philo - Designer

From her shop-in-shop at Bergdorf's to this space on Lafayette, I’m surprised by how uninspiring and unexciting the physical retail aspect of her brand is—it feels like an afterthought. I wonder if they’ll put in more effort once she opens a stand-alone shop.
She should take a look at The Row and Toteme, with beautifully designed stores and curated interiors.
I don’t think Phoebe look at people who based their brands’s aesthetic around her work as inspiration.
And I don’t think she sees those brands as her competition. Clearly her moves doesn’t suggest it.

It looks like an Old Celine store. I can’t even be mad at her for replicating what she did at Celine at her own brand.

She is building the foundation of her house with her classics. And again I don’t mind it because it’s her own house.
A sense of familiarity is essential.
 
Pictures of her latest collection ("C") are up on her site and I think it's her best (for her own label) so far.
Also the pictures are finally a bit brighter, which makes everything look even more desirable.

I heard since she expanded to a more traditional wholesale model too, her brand is selling really well at the multi brand stores.
 
She's now expanding her wholesale network to 37 retailers worldwide...so slowly but surely she's actually entirely moving away from DTC only.
I suppose she has strict rules for the multibrand stores when it comes to not applying markdowns etcetera as more brands do.
In Europe it’s super illegal to do so though. If you sell a product to a wholesaler you can “recommend” them not to do markdown, but they are 100% free to do so… you can get a fine up to 10% of the total business if there’s a minimum sign that you tried to convince them not to do it, and the auditors are super picky! Also if you cancel them for next season after the markdowns is super tricky… but I guess good partners would follow what she suggests.

Anyways, it makes sense that she’s expanding through wholesale. But I have the same feeling Thefrenchy has… I feel that she didn’t do it right.

I would’ve expected a tiny evolution at least. There are some things that are variations of her Céline… which is normal but I don’t know. It feels very dry and uninteresting and a little bit passé. I adore her though, she’s probably one of the very best designers of our generation and has nothing else to prove, but still her own brand kinda disappointed me.
 
She launched a "new" purse, which is basically a version of the Céline trio...she is copying herself! So soon run out of ideas or what??



phoebephilo.com/
I was commenting that with a friend… maybe it’s smart to redo her bestsellers :lol: you also have the silk white dress with lace in the hem.

Anyway, you all had a very interesting conversation here… loved everybody’s insights and I feel everyone is right in a way.
 
In Europe it’s super illegal to do so though. If you sell a product to a wholesaler you can “recommend” them not to do markdown, but they are 100% free to do so… you can get a fine up to 10% of the total business if there’s a minimum sign that you tried to convince them not to do it, and the auditors are super picky! Also if you cancel them for next season after the markdowns is super tricky… but I guess good partners would follow what she suggests.

It may be illegal, but some brands have subtle ways of signaling to retailers that they shouldn’t mark down their products. At the same time, retailers have found ways to offer discounts without the brands finding out. In the worst-case scenario, a retailer could jeopardize its relationship with a brand and lose the ability to purchase from them altogether.

For Phoebe, however, this may be less of a concern, since she’s kept her e-commerce business exclusively on her own site so far. Multi-brand retailers aren't able to offer her pieces through their own online channels. I think that's a clever move on her end.

Ultimately, sites like Net-a-Porter and Matches (R.I.P.) played a major role in the so-called markdown “wars” at one point—much to the frustration of many brands.
 
In Europe it’s super illegal to do so though. If you sell a product to a wholesaler you can “recommend” them not to do markdown, but they are 100% free to do so… you can get a fine up to 10% of the total business if there’s a minimum sign that you tried to convince them not to do it, and the auditors are super picky! Also if you cancel them for next season after the markdowns is super tricky… but I guess good partners would follow what she suggests.
That’s why the shop-in-shop option was a clever idea for GL. She gets control over those kind of things. And she has a global deal with DSM so I’m sure those issues are covered.

I think that for year 2, it’s not bad.

As much as I want her to have a full retail space. I think she should take her time. I mean Alaia only had 1 store in the world for years. I just hope that when she decides to open a store, it will be in Paris.

I also hope that we won’t wait until year 5 of activity to get a show.
 
I was commenting that with a friend… maybe it’s smart to redo her bestsellers :lol: you also have the silk white dress with lace in the hem.

Anyway, you all had a very interesting conversation here… loved everybody’s insights and I feel everyone is right in a way.
also isn't the point of having a style to revisit ideas of the past !!!

the trio bag concept she made popular why not do new versions ...its like forbidding Hermes to do a birkin that is a version of a HAC that a Kelly bag also borrow same closure etc etc versacge not using chain mail or prada not doing a pleated skirt ever again lol
 
I echo some sentiments that I was maybe a tad bit underwhelmed by some of the moves the brand has been making.

But when I start to look at some of the pieces, styling, overall image, and who is wearing it publicly, she is still very much the blueprint and ahead of the pack. While many have copied her and this look is largely what has been in for several seasons, none of that is cool. There's something off about her cuts, proportions, and even details that still interests me because they feel more rooted in something distinctly British — some mod here and there, '80s rare groove, rave culture, new romantics, etc. It's very hard to articulate where that happens but it's more of a sensibility and an attitude that comes through in her work that feels like piece or idea is connected to something bigger or interesting or cool. Even if you go and look at her work at Chloe, which had a different aesthetic, sure — much of this attitude is still there.

Moreover, I like that she's not afraid to make garments that are sexy, despite being thought of as a minimalist who is leading the charge of clinical product offerings. Helmut Lang comes to mind as another designer who was thought of as a minimalist but could still cut something that had a sexual charge to it. I think for both of these designers it always comes back to their interest in the body, how the body moves, where something will fall after it's been worn for the whole day, etc. I understand the idea that she is making clothes for woman, not the male gaze, but don't woman want to feel sexy too? Can there be sexy offerings that also can exist in a wardrobe of other offerings that are more modest and covered up? According to the PP-like brands today, nope.

Even if many of these PP-like brands today can replicate her work to a t, they feel devoid of a lot of the soul her clothes have and that becomes sharply apparent when you track the very moment a lot of these designers and brands began to push out PP-like products.

Anyway, rant done. If she decides to not do shows, fine. However, I would love some different type of presentation? A film, maybe something with music? Not sure what exactly it is but I do miss some of her world building.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,623
Messages
15,230,561
Members
87,450
Latest member
Chloewasabi
Back
Top