MulletProof
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2004
- Messages
- 28,747
- Reaction score
- 7,372
You like these theme parks, Pricciao? that second picture looks like hell, whereas the first one looks like a peaceful gift full of wheat variety.
I'm usually indifferent to Prada and can probably at this point just say that I don't like [post-06] Prada. Meanwhile I love the sugary creativity at Gucci and how it's been so precise and excessive and full of energy.. it does make sense to compare Prada to Legoland because, much like Disneyland, I can't think of a more odious place full of themes that never live up to whatever they're based on. I think Gucci is okay being the ball pit at McDonalds, inconsequential and yet feels so good
..
The problem I found with Gucci this season is that he relied too much on a certain order and specific pieces with proved success, which leaves you feeling like it's a remake of his own remakes of vintage pieces.. I'll always favor designers that refuse to flip the page so abruptly just to please a stupid clientele (and Gucci gathers some of the worst- the kind that demand to be served with status and hype at all times) no matter how derivative it feels to the spectator, but this actually feels like it sold well so he was asked to cook more of the same, I mean, how many times do we have to inhale that stupid bomber jacket? the ruffled long dress? the p*ssy bows?, that aesthetic he favors is endless so, explore a little maybe? challenge yourself?.. there are still some beautiful, good fun type of pieces there, like this jacket and whatever is happening underneath, the mint dress, the white pleated skirts, but I was mostly immune and maybe even bothered by the rest, especially with the added bonus of being so trendy at this point (started by him of course, but no less played out).
As for Prada, I think that in addition to having a good range of feel-good pieces that put a smile on your face (to be aggressively and grossly advertised 4 months later..), there's also a warmth to it, literal and implied, that has been absent in previous years and that seems to be in the air in general and also, and maybe I'm tripping here but even though she's played with these old lady/grandma elements before, this shift towards all things cozy (seen in other shows too) while somehow being the opposite of hibernation by making it so loud, the way these knits crawl on some of the regular 'work' jackets, combined with commentary on the role of women, is an optimistic message about roots and strength, camaderie.. which is a bit bittersweet but shows her sociopolitical side and the wisdom of her years..
So in short, while Alessandro is being realistic (borderline cynical) talking to his luxury brands audience, Miuccia is trying to talk to a broader audience without forgetting her place as a fashion designer. I would love more of this kind of humility in fashion, at least for a while, then we can resume to the fantasy/bubble complex.
I'm usually indifferent to Prada and can probably at this point just say that I don't like [post-06] Prada. Meanwhile I love the sugary creativity at Gucci and how it's been so precise and excessive and full of energy.. it does make sense to compare Prada to Legoland because, much like Disneyland, I can't think of a more odious place full of themes that never live up to whatever they're based on. I think Gucci is okay being the ball pit at McDonalds, inconsequential and yet feels so good

The problem I found with Gucci this season is that he relied too much on a certain order and specific pieces with proved success, which leaves you feeling like it's a remake of his own remakes of vintage pieces.. I'll always favor designers that refuse to flip the page so abruptly just to please a stupid clientele (and Gucci gathers some of the worst- the kind that demand to be served with status and hype at all times) no matter how derivative it feels to the spectator, but this actually feels like it sold well so he was asked to cook more of the same, I mean, how many times do we have to inhale that stupid bomber jacket? the ruffled long dress? the p*ssy bows?, that aesthetic he favors is endless so, explore a little maybe? challenge yourself?.. there are still some beautiful, good fun type of pieces there, like this jacket and whatever is happening underneath, the mint dress, the white pleated skirts, but I was mostly immune and maybe even bothered by the rest, especially with the added bonus of being so trendy at this point (started by him of course, but no less played out).
As for Prada, I think that in addition to having a good range of feel-good pieces that put a smile on your face (to be aggressively and grossly advertised 4 months later..), there's also a warmth to it, literal and implied, that has been absent in previous years and that seems to be in the air in general and also, and maybe I'm tripping here but even though she's played with these old lady/grandma elements before, this shift towards all things cozy (seen in other shows too) while somehow being the opposite of hibernation by making it so loud, the way these knits crawl on some of the regular 'work' jackets, combined with commentary on the role of women, is an optimistic message about roots and strength, camaderie.. which is a bit bittersweet but shows her sociopolitical side and the wisdom of her years..
So in short, while Alessandro is being realistic (borderline cynical) talking to his luxury brands audience, Miuccia is trying to talk to a broader audience without forgetting her place as a fashion designer. I would love more of this kind of humility in fashion, at least for a while, then we can resume to the fantasy/bubble complex.
Last edited by a moderator: