Tar Magazine #2 : Kate Moss by Damien Hirst

[MissMagAddict]

The impact of the recession on fashion magazines has been severe, with some titles closing and others cutting back on staff and pages — or, in the case of Tar, a new indie arts biannual, half of Kate Moss’s face.

The magazine, which will release its second issue on April 15, will undoubtedly draw attention for a cover image created by the artist Damien Hirst. It shows Ms. Moss with her skin pulled back to expose the muscle tissue along one side of her face.

It is not the idealized cover image you might expect would help to sell a magazine, though the distortion is really not that different from the extreme retouching that routinely goes on at mainstream publications to make celebrities look “better,” only to make them look like aliens. (How many people recognized Reese Witherspoon on the cover of the April issue of Elle?)

“I think the cover really ties in both the conscious and subconscious levels of the beauty myth, tearing away the layers and looking at what’s below,” said Evanly Schindler, the editor of Tar. Mr. Schindler, who was a founder of BlackBook, started Tar (an anagram of art) to explore the intersection of art and fashion from a perspective that is both intellectually pointed and socially conscious but still stylishly produced.

The magazine’s first issue was a considerable success, selling about 54 percent of its 90,000 copies. Advertisements for luxury brands like Barneys New York, Prada and Giorgio Armani jockeyed for position with Tar’s provocative content — a feat since Tar has a lot of more words than clothes. That issue included a fashion feature of tribal costumes, loads of Ryan McGinley nudes and a smart discussion on politics and media perception between Christiane Amanpour of CNN and the documentarian Jehane Noujaim.

In his office on Hudson Street, Mr. Schindler said the reaction to Tar had been encouraging but that producing a second issue was challenging, as advertisers, reacting to the economy, became scarce. He dropped some ad rates ($20,000 a page) by as much as half but was still able to maintain the lavish quality thanks to a partnership with Siz, an Italian company that specializes in museum art books.

Yves Saint Laurent was so attracted to the concept — the theme of the second issue is transparency, illustrated literally with the cover image — that the company requested space adjacent to an article about the embarrassment of being perversely rich.

What makes Tar appealing is that it rejects the traditionally reverential approach to fashion, hiring fashion photographers to take portraits of serious subjects and artists to look at clothes. For example, Elle Muliarchyk photographed accessories by sneaking into a church, placing a Van Cleef & Arpels brooch on a statue of the Mother and Child. Terry Richardson, known for his fashion work, created portraits of New York psychiatrists in their offices.

“It’s not a fashion magazine,” Mr. Schindler said. “The idea was to make it a specialized product, like an art book of what’s happening in this moment. It’s a time capsule.”

source | nytimes

 

[vogue28]

I would of preferred a full face. But the 'muscle tissue side' gives it a lot more edge.

 

[Manuva]

That's not a new shot, is it? I think that's a shot from an old W editorial.

 

[masquerade]

this is amazing, thank you so much

 

[Luxx]

This is really an eye-catching image. You can't miss it, even if you don't know that it's Kate the picture just calls to you.

 

[AnaBGD]

I like this, it looks cool and yeah, very eye-catching.

 

[KateIsGr8]

That's not a new shot, is it? I think that's a shot from an old W editorial.

Looks like it. And if we're talking about the same thing, it was the cover and she either had yellow or gold on with bright pink letters...

 

[masquerade]

That's not a new shot, is it? I think that's a shot from an old W editorial.

Thats not the point. Even the publisher himself says that the magazine is not a fashion magazine. In the article, they discuss the use of retouching and how it makes women unrecognizable. By using a photo that has been shot for the purpose of being in a magazine and being retouched, they are illuminating the artifice of those very images.

 

[Manuva]

^It wasn't a criticism just a genuine question.

 

[surrealseven]

That's not a new shot, is it? I think that's a shot from an old W editorial.

Yup, it's actually Kate Moss on the cover of W March 2005 by Mert Alas & Marcus Piggott.

 

[taben]

Wow I love this! Do you guys think it'll be available at Borders?

 

[lucy92]

i love this cover.
we are all the same underneath out skin.

 

[BerlinRocks]

That's not a new shot, is it? I think that's a shot from an old W editorial.

heu ....


it's an artwork by Damien Hirst ...

 

[thiago:)]

It's eyecatching but I prefer the original one.

 

[mikel]

heu ....


it's an artwork by Damien Hirst ...

what's so strange about Manuva's comment? Damien Hirst coulde have shot Kate herself for his artwork... ( in this case he didn't obviously)

 

[twin star]

what's so strange about Manuva's comment? Damien Hirst coulde have shot Kate herself for his artwork... ( in this case he didn't obviously)

nothing is wrong about her comment. ppl are just quick to reply and miss her point.

 

[tigerrouge]

Kate Moss... Damien Hirst... Moss as artist's muse... Hirst reprising something about flesh that simply calls on our instinctive reaction to the sight of such things, then people adding a layer of pseudo-intellectualism on the lazy process in order to be part of the art club.

IS THERE NOTHING NEW IN THIS WORLD?

Pieces of 'art' in museums and magazines that have riffed on the image of Ms Moss are numerous, and this is the worst I've seen so far. And I also can't look at the cover shot without recalling W and thinking fondly of that issue.

Weirdest cover reprint ever, I'll give it that.

 

[MissMagAddict]

That's not a new shot, is it? I think that's a shot from an old W editorial.

Thank you for seeing that Manuva The image is from March 2005 by Inez van Lamsweerde & Vinoodh Matadin. Damien Hirst used the image to make his painting.

source | wmagazine

 

[rh85]

they discuss the use of retouching and how it makes women unrecognizable

wow, and they picked the best example, Kate Moss! the most airbrushed woman in history.

The "what you see is what you DON'T get" at its best!

 

[tigerrouge]

I don't mean to be so hard on the magazine - it has to sell itself somehow - and why not combine the populism of Kate Moss with their own arty agenda, but reading that press release...