The Business of Magazines | Page 131 | the Fashion Spot

The Business of Magazines

There is no way the price increase will get them a boost! Newstands sales are tough, and failing anyway, so changing the size, and making it more expensive is not the way to go!
 
They´re also saying they´re changing the paper stock, I´m trying to figure out if these chances are related printing wise but I don´t see it... perhaps it´s an excuse to justify the $1 price increase?
 
Is this going to be a blanket price increase for September? I can't help but feel there has to be some confusion in the relaying of the information... like a larger scale version will be available, as well as subscribers and other newstands carrying the standard edition? That's how Harper's UK handled their size increase for September and March issues.
 
I'm just a bit concerned with what they'll ultimately ship to the UK, espesially if two sizes will float for the same month. Which will it be, standard or special? With Harper's I'm not at all bothered with the special size because standard is easily available.
 
I'd like to get your guy's opinion on an idea I've mused about here on TFS. Isn't it unwise for magazines to almost exclusively pander to young people? ("Young people" I'd say are teenagers, early to mid twenties.) Young people have very little money especially these days, and now seem to do everything on their phones. Will they spend at least 5 dollars on a magazine, 10 for the September issue of Vogue? It seems to me that marketing towards "older" (mid-late twenties and up) people, who are familiar with reading magazines and have money from a stable career, is the safer bet for making money. Are most young Gigi Hadid fans likely to buy the May issue of Vogue, or will they just look at the shoot free online?

In this thread a few months ago was a story how a certain magazine subscriber's didn't go up, newsstand sales weren't up, but their Instagram followers were up. The Instagram followers didn't translate into sales.

I'd love to hear your thoughts on this! :flower:
 
^I agree. I always said the same thing regarding ad campaigns as well. Some members have argued that magazines and brands are trying to stablish rapport with young people today because they´re the ones who´ll be spending money in a few years, but in the meantime you marginalized your audience? I just don´t get it...
 
^I agree. I always said the same thing regarding ad campaigns as well. Some members have argued that magazines and brands are trying to stablish rapport with young people today because they´re the ones who´ll be spending money in a few years, but in the meantime you marginalized your audience? I just don´t get it...

But if they establish a relationship with youth, what happens when the they get older and the brand is still marketing to young people? The young-turned-older likely aren't interested anymore in youth culture.
 
Isn't it unwise for magazines to almost exclusively pander to young people? ("Young people" I'd say are teenagers, early to mid twenties.)

Ah, the million-dollar question!

It is a must for every industry, not just the magazine or the fashion industry, to adapt to the now generation, but, however, it must not be to the expense of the other generations. The case that's happening now is that majority of businesses out there focus too much on today's "youth" that it becomes to the prejudice of others (us, who aren't part of that generation). It's always about the interest of the youth - social media ++, that they forget the interests of those who've matured with them. However, they also seem to forget that the Social Media generation are not the buying market. They are the "tapping" market. Tap, like, share, retweet, but a majority of them don't even buy, unlike those who are alienated, which has the buying capacity / power (in the case of magazines).

How many Gigi Hadid / Kendall Jenner supporters out there are buying the issues they've covered? Do you honestly think that an average teen would buy an issue when they can simply get the HQ from the internet and make it their wallpaper (or for whatever purpose?) Most importantly, how many of us, who grew up to be loyal collectors of magazines, stopped buying because we feel so left out? I sometimes find myself so disinterested with a magazine because I can't relate to it. I forgot the last time that I jumped for joy because of an editorial. I forgot the last time that I felt that I could pull off the styling in an editorial. It's all about the youth youth youth.

In essence, there was no compromise. Personally speaking, as a loyal customer to clothes, magazines ++, I suddenly felt left out. And I think that's not how proper marketing is. They say you can't get the best of both worlds, but in these industries, you actually could through proper marketing. A strategy should never prejudice a market, more so the loyal and long standing ones.

I completely agree with kokobombon, maybe they really are investing with the next generation of adult audience. But what a bad decision to alienate the now audience
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, the million-dollar question! [...] Most importantly, how many of us, who grew up to be loyal collectors of magazines, stopped buying because we feel so left out? I sometimes find myself so disinterested with a magazine because I can't relate to it. I forgot the last time that I jumped for joy because of an editorial. [...] In essence, there was no compromise. Personally speaking, as a loyal customer to clothes, magazines ++, I suddenly felt left out. [...] I completely agree with kokobombon, maybe they really are investing with the next generation of adult audience. But what a bad decision to alienate the now audience

My very thoughts exactly !!! EVERY word you used here is, almost as always, is what I´m thinking about. I sooo so agree MON. Kokobombon is right too: our generation (Late 20 to early 40 perhaps) has grown up without the social networks and then they arrived to our lives and we adapted ourselves with them but I also don´t even remember the last time when I bought 5-6 magazines a day and to have 10 magazines in my house every month. I think it was 4-5 years ago: when fashion models were REAL fashion models, when Anna Wintour did not favor girls like Kate Upton or Kendal Jenner just because they are the flavor of the month, when ad campaigns were really creatives and designers were staying at their fashion houses for 5 years or more and not like this musical chairs´ syndrome. I like some covers and fashion stories now but I don´t rush to the newsstands to buy several magazines. And having a bigger size or having more ads is not going to make the magazine itself more interesting lol.
 
This a very long take-down (follow the link for the rest of the article), but certainly worth the read! :lol:

ELLE on Earth

How a leading women's magazine ruined a once-in-a-lifetime interview with fashion legend Rei Kawakubo

By Jacques Hyzagi • 03/30/16 9:00am

The press used to subsist on leaks; it now thrives on plants. The politician is not a liar or a demagogue but a product. It was therefore revealed a month ago that the hacks Marc Ambinder and Mike Allen of respectively the boring Atlantic and vapid Politico sold their souls to Hillary Clinton’s staff in order to get access: first reads were promised, quote approval, word veto, talking point insertion, narrative change and forced rewrite. Time Warner, Conde Nast and Hearst don’t hire editors in chief anymore but editors able to understand the value of the marketing division to the newsroom and how they should be merged, which is code for content branding.

A strong case in point is ELLE magazine.

Last June I obtained a very hard to get interview with the Japanese designer Rei Kawakubo from Comme des Garçons. Ms. Kawakubo is the Bob Dylan of fashion—a designer’s designer—probably the most interesting designer alive today and she knows it. She is also the head of an empire that has never accepted outside investors and in such her independence is total. She has her own praetorian guard in the person of her spokesperson/husband Adrian Joffe and an army of yes men and women who run away cowering at her first snap. She refuses to be photographed, has given the same bland elliptical interview every five years for the last thirty years, hates journalists and is known to answer a long, in-depth question with a lethal yes or no. She is fiercely intelligent and has no patience for goobers. She is probably killing herself in her old age by trying to find four times a year entirely new ideas for each collection as she refuses to tap into the archives of fashion and recycle the old into the new like most designers do when they start their ersatz collections. The result is breathtaking.

“Are you neurotic?” I asked her, cutting her cold through one of her standard default rants. A silence fell in the room as if the guillotine had just fallen on the fat neck of this irreverent Robespierre, which actually happened just a few yards from where this interview took place. For a second I thought she was about to end the interview but she smiled at me. She understood what I was doing.

“Have you cut yourself off because of your status?” I later asked her. Of course she said no but every single celebrity has, even the local celebrities in your families and in the god forsaken villages you grew up in before you came to New York to be as far away as possible from this kind of crassness.

Before I could sit in front of her in Paris I had to find a publication that could ship my pathetic *** across the pond. The bores at New York Magazine said no because I would not be able to get her to say anything interesting. The New York Observer cried poverty at even the tiny budget I proposed. David Remnick at the New Yorker very politely took the time to cut and paste an old profile that his magazine ran ten years ago and to tell me that they never repeat a profile except when it’s a puff piece on Hillary. Although Judith Thurman’s “The Misfit” from 2005 is the smartest one written so far on Ms. Kawakubo the piece was academic, bizarrely self-absorbed and often wrong. Very Reader’s Digest meets GQ, like what the entire New Yorker unfortunately became. CDG hated it because Ms. Thurman committed the crime of lèse-majesté when she said that Adrian Joffe was afraid of his wife. I observed them interacting, he is. Mr. Remnick is nice but he’s no William Shawn, as his past reporting on Russia can attest. They were treasure troves of platitudes and predictions that all turned out to be wrong. I realized Anna Wintour had never invited Rei, the goddess of fashion, worshipped by every single designer from Karl Lagerfeld to Marc Jacobs and Alexander Wang, to her insufferable annual ball at the Met. Had Rei refused the yearly extortion of ad buying in Anna’s September issue too many falls in a row? So Vogue was out, which left us with Robbie Meyers at ELLE.

Yes I want it, the woman famous for wearing this soufflé pompadour on her head instantly told me, but please give me the chance to meet you and tell you why talking about the Met Ball slight would be a bad idea. I was never invited either she told me, if this can make you feel any better. Robbie was very excited about the interview but strangely, CDG wasn’t. Who is Robbie? Adrian asked in front of me. The behived he was told. Haaa yes he said. In London The Guardian asked me to write about it and I convinced CDG that we could do a joint venture—London and New York with the same interviews. This could cut the heavy costs of sending people to Paris in the middle of the high season. Robbie as editor in chief sees her job as putting out fires and delegating, a strange mutually defeating combo. She told me that Anne Slowey, the news top editor would work with me on this. I will not do The Guardian piece I told Anne if you need an exclusive. I don’t care, she told me, we are two different outlets. Come meet me at 3pm tomorrow. At 2:30 the meeting was cancelled; something better came up. You would think that the extremely rare interview of the most sought after and talented living designer in the world would be of importance to ELLE. It was to Robbie but apparently not to her underling. I’m sure Anne was annoyed that her boss told her that she had accepted my interview with Rei and that she was assigned to it. Fair to bet that she thought: who is this ******* coming out of nowhere?

Almost famous people have a tendency to act even more obnoxiously than the famous ones. By 3:45 the meeting was suddenly back on in a bar in the West Village. Then by 3:30 the location was changed to the East Side. By 4:00 as I just crossed town it was cancelled again and back on by 4:15 at a different place but Anne had to go pick up her young kids by 5 so the meeting would be short. Although Anne had my phone she was sending these directives via CDG as if I was working for them and they were then relaying them to me by phone. I had more luck meeting that Hezbollah leader in downtown Beirut for an interview.

Realizing I was dealing with a power angry maniac I called the meeting off and stood her up. Almost famous people have a tendency to act even more obnoxiously than the famous ones. Graydon Carter, who knows a thing or two about fame, has this parable about a peasant like me arriving in New York from his hamlet and trying to make it in the big city like in a Balzac novel. The provincial enters a dark room and tries to find a door that will enable him to enter another room and so on until he finally reaches success but at each room the door to the next is more difficult to find. Usually in New York society very few arrivistes make it past the first room. I have no idea what he’s talking and it’s probably why his magazine is a giant bore.

I chose Edith Wharton when time came to learn about New York social cues and suffice to say there was no mirth in the house of ELLE. I thought the hell with it I’ll go somewhere else but by then CDG was set on ELLE and the Guardian, the same outlets I had to work (is it clear here that it was CDG I had to convince into accepting the outlets?) hard in convincing in the first place. I understood that once you set the process forward with the egomaniac genius and precise designer, the slightest change might send the whole apparatus crashing. Too often the fear instilled by mediocrity and incompetence, the two t*ts that nourish capitalistic societies, can only feed the beast if patterns and routines are kept as is. The slightest changes might unravel the whole company because they will unveil a paper-like deus ex machina.

We all know most of our colleagues at work are incompetent frauds but it is the smallest unexpected change in our routines that reveal how easy it would be for our collective inefficiency to bring about destruction—how close we are from complete collapse. A box cutter brought down the World Trade Center and our air defense system with it.

I talked to Robbie and explained to her what had happened and that I couldn’t work with a power hungry flake. Ten minutes later Anne was calling me. I could tell I was on speakerphone. We decided that better than Paris, Tokyo should be the venue for the interview since Rei lives and works there. I told Anne that I see Rei as a Romantic from early 19th century, a time when painters started depicting fires, ruins, decay and painted people from the back in a rebuke to the sickening self righteousness of the Enlightenment and by extension as a Dada trying to destroy art.

That’s great I love it, she said, people are so ****ing stupid nobody knows what Dada is. I told her I would ask other big designers to contribute to the piece as a sort of homage to the grande dame of couture—Lagerfeld, Jacobs, Tom Ford, Alber Elbaz, Wang, Nicolas Ghesquière—in order to place Rei in the annals of fashion. I also thought about including people from outside of fashion—people she admires, like Ai Weiwei, for instance—and asking them to produce something for the piece. It would be a great piece.

I wanted to talk about the Anna Wintour slight at the Met Ball and she told me everybody is sick and tired of ****ing Anna Wintour. Let me deal with the other designers’ tributes, you do the interview and write the piece, she told me. She never did any of it, of course. My impression of Anne was that she was loud and tacky. I had heard that working with her was a mess akin to making a mule piss in a public bathroom.

I then decided that the interview would take place in Paris, the sooner the better at the end of last June during the men’s collections. Forget Tokyo, I thought, this woman is unstable and the longer this will take the worse it will be. I told CDG of the latest change of plan and Anne told them when she learned the news that she would send someone else to Paris, which was obviously her plan from the beginning. I had that intuition so I bluffed CDG and told them that I heard of Anne’s plan to take me out of the interview. Yes it’s true, they said, but not to worry it wasn’t going to happen. I guess now they wanted the Guardian too.

This went on till the day of departure. I asked Anne to get the green light directly from Robbie regarding the expenses and fees and that I would not step on that plane the next day unless Robbie herself gave me the go............

Source: http://observer.com/2016/03/elle-on-earth/
 
I got it on a Friday night at 10 pm, which is when I bought the tickets, and we left for Paris the next day in the evening. My writing partner accompanied me. Adrian Joffe, Rei’s husband, told me people will come after you from every angle, once they know you got that interview. We met with Rei twice. In order to secure the interview I had to promise a first read with the Faustian understanding that only facts would be checked by CDG, not content. We don’t do first reads Anne screamed on the phone and I don’t want you to meet with her in passing—you must spend time with her, she said, as if she were Katharine Graham.

Fashion is a strange world. Living in New York I had tangentially approached it when, being a douche, I dated models, a fashion editor and a designer who worked with Alexander McQueen. A friend and mentor of mine tried to launch his own line and even had one of his dresses in Barney’s Uptown window. He was gay. He would hit on a friend of mine and I would tell him, Tony, the guy is straight. Straight to bed, he would fire right back. He was a poet, a beautiful loser like me. He ended up living in his bed in his mother’s house in Brooklyn.

Every other gay guy has, like Tony did, a beautiful dress tucked away in his closet for special occasions. Most of the women gay guys worship work in the fashion industry. They all have the aura of a Bette Davis, Joan Crawford or Lucille Ball or the mom in Grey Gardens. Steely strong women, cold, authoritarian, powerful, slightly unhinged, aloof but charming, tender but cutting, vain but elitist, superficial but cultured, terribly cruel and laudatory in the same sentence, frivol, cunning and manipulative, overdramatic, superb, all bringing, as Hamish Bowles ridiculously once said, ‘a powerhouse of pizzaz’. Their mothers, for most.Rei Kawakubo in that respect would be the queen bee.

For someone of her stature to smile when I asked her if she were neurotic goes beyond the fact that no one has ever talked to her like this in 40 years. It was the moment that I could see she was playing, that it was all an act. She knows she is the most important designer alive and she plays the part down to her refusal to give interviews or have her photo taken, which I did anyway on my iPhone. Her work, even for someone like me who hates fashion, is breathtaking. A folly in the sense that Federico Fellini and Pier Paolo Pasolini’s films were follies.

Anna Wintour herself said it recently, fashion works from the street up to designers not from the top down. The most attractive women in New York wear a leather jacket, beat up boyfriend jeans and used combat boots. Most of the clothes the best designers—mainly gay men—put on the runways are restricting, repressing camisoles that restrain women as if they were hysterics on the way to the loony bin, not to say anything of the sadistic high heels that submissive women awkwardly don, torture apparatus meant to apparently please an ethos from the worst patriarchy.

The models I have dated were fashion proof in their daily lives. They would never be caught dead wearing any of these sartorial debasements. But models more than any designers and fashion editors, who mostly remain part of a very limited, incestuous cast, had a remarkable impact on society over the last three decades. Most of them in order to stay skeletal did coke in the 80’s, ate sushi in the 90’s and sweated on these yoga mats at the turn of the century before any of us did. They all worship Hermann Hesse’s Siddhartha and spent their afternoons at the Rubin, which makes for easy break ups. They probably did more for Buddhism than the Dalai Lama in his Gucci loafers, all in the name of that size zero so searched after by designers who looove women. When I grew up, size zero was only spoken to in reference to the death camps.

It was a no hold barred interview. Rei opened up for the first time about the way she creates, her excitement at the punk movement in the late 70’s, her support for Hillary Clinton, her interest in the Dada movement, her disdain for feminism, the folly of her constant search for the new, her consternation at the corporatization of today’s fashion, her hatred of the jingoistic current Japanese Prime Minister, the restraints that she imposes on herself and therefore her work, the limits of freedom.

None of this will make it in the interview ELLE publishes. Spending time with Rei and her husband Adrian was extraordinary, stimulating, challenging, extremely refreshing. Her work reminds me of Pessoa I told Adrian. Yes of course he said, the Saudade. We left Paris and went to the south of France to write the piece that I had promised would be 10,000 words. The Riviera is the perfect place to make you forget what a schmuck you are. A week later Anne had a copy of the piece on her desk. I’ll edit it next week she told me. I never heard from her.

By late August I contacted her as we had to coordinate with the Guardian, which was running the story front page early-mid September during London fashion week, in order to not overlap. No answer. The Guardian was becoming impatient. Why hasn’t Anne sent me her edits I finally asked Robbie—now the Guardian is going to press in two weeks, don’t you guys want to know what I’m gonna write for them? This is the first time I heard of this Robbie said. When did Anne get your piece? Almost three months ago, I said. She asked me to send to her and a coterie of managing editors the e-mail chain so I could substantiate my claim, as if I were lying. I sent them the discovery of evidence. The Guardian is going before us? Robbie asked me. How is that possible?

I sent her my piece for London. Great, she said—now obviously irritated—this is exactly what we would have run. I could hear the fascist and anti-Semite William Randolph Hearst turning in his grave. The Hearst perfume magazines, among them ELLE, Harper’s Bazaar, Cosmo, Marie Claire, O can thank for their survival the drug data company, First Data Bank—the credit rating agency Fitch Ratings (part of Fitch group) own at 80 percent by Hearst and the software company Homecare Homebase that bring in the bigger share of Hearst revenues. One can easily see why.

It became clear to me that Anne was hell-bent on sabotaging the piece after I had dared that day to cancel our manic ever-changing meetings. She was not in a position of power to outright kill the piece, since Robbie had originally commissioned it, but she was ready to let it die by Lingchi, a thousand cuts.By that time I had spent thousands of dollars of my own monies and I just wanted to get paid. I know I told you it would be better not to talk about Rei’s slight at the Met Ball by Anna Wintour, but how does she feel about it? Robbie asked me. Not good I told her. What is her relationship like with Adrian, everybody is curious, she asked. I think he’s gay I told her. We really focus on how women live in this world at ELLE, she said, what does she think of being a powerful woman in fashion, of women’s issues, feminism? She hates it, I told her.

Anne finally told me she would send me her edits. That was in October. Two weeks ago her minion Noah asked for my address to send me an advanced copy of the March issue. Where are your edits, I asked Anne? You didn’t receive my emails? She said. I sent them to you before Christmas when we closed the March issue. Adrian helped me with the interview part—we just changed a few things—he acted as the literary translator, his words not mine she said. It’s a terrific interview, she added, sensing the storm coming. I never received your emails because you never sent them you liar, I told her—making sure to cc Hearst’s entire masthead. Since when does the brand rewrite an interview at ELLE? I asked her. Your name is on top in big letters she said trying desperately to massage my ego.

The interview published in ELLE this month is surprisingly tight, concise and actually quite good. Only an eye well trained in the art of George Orwell’s double speak would be able to detect the branded content at play in full force here. It is bland, milquetoast, uninformative, safe above all, boring. An infomercial. Adrian Joffe made sure of it. It has nothing to do with the interview Rei gave us. It is marital beardy betrayal of the worst kind. Anne discarded the text I had written entirely but not before she stole its structures and plagiarized its ideas. Because she cannot write and is not very bright she succeeded, no small feat, in making a fascinating and revolutionary person such as Rei sound mediocre. Her text is replete with platitudes and clichés, with no insight or intelligence to speak for it and now looks like a perfect Wikipedia entry. You could read these lines and rightfully find them quite presumptuous and arrogant. So you will be the judge.

When the Guardian heard about this they made sure that the British fashion magazine 10 would publish a text I would write on Rei. It is now on sale in every newsstand in New York, uncensored, unpurloined. Adrian Joffe did not content brand it. The real interview, which according to her husband was the best she had ever given? It will stay locked in a vault at ELLE and a contract signed by a broke writer will make sure that nobody ever reads it.
*observer.com
 
^Low-key homophobia and body shaming aside, this was a fun read. It just seems a bit naive to think that Elle of all magazines would publish the interview without overhauling it to match their agenda and content branding. Most mainstream women's magazines are merely infomercials anyway. Plus, an interview with antifeministic quotes would not fly with the current market of branded empowerment.
 
^Low-key homophobia and body shaming aside, this was a fun read. It just seems a bit naive to think that Elle of all magazines would publish the interview without overhauling it to match their agenda and content branding. Most mainstream women's magazines are merely infomercials anyway. Plus, an interview with antifeministic quotes would not fly with the current market of branded empowerment.

Agreed, and I won't hate on them for staying true to their brand! But yet on the other hand, it's Rei Kawakubo!! :lol: The woman is everything but conventional and does not grant interviews to every Jack and Jill. If they couldn't deal with her eccentric persona, then they should stick to Carolina Herrera. The funny thing about Elle is that they're afforded such amazing inducements, yet never capitalise on it with gusto. Last year they somehow got the fiercely private Raf Simons and other top players to pose for them, and it ended up looking like a set of glorified staff photos. Now they had an epic moment with one of the industry's most obscure designers, and completely blew it. They'll probably never secure her again, so why not make an event of it? Something tells me they never quite comprehended the magnitude of this profile before it was even brokered. Just compare the Guardian piece published last September with the one currently up on Elle.com. Rei comes across as refreshingly cooperative in the former, and bored in the latter.

Either way, I enjoyed this witty little soapbox rant filled with hilarious metaphors and the like. The entire situation does remind me somewhat of that whole Joan Juliet Buck debacle with Vogue over the Syrian first lady.
 
Clothing line accuses Beyoncé of playing dirty with mag credits

By Carlos Greer
April 14, 2016 | 9:57pm

Brass from Bronx-based dancewear manufacturer KD New York are fuming that they weren’t credited in Elle’s Beyoncé cover story.

The singer wore the company’s leggings in the spread, but the piece online only credits Ivy Park, Beyoncé’s own line with Topshop.

A rep for KD told Page Six that the brand was at first credited until someone from Beyoncé’s camp allegedly had Elle pull the online credit.

“We were fully credited when the story went up, and then I went back a couple of days later and it was removed,” owner David Lee told us. “Someone [close to Beyoncé] called and said the credits were going to be removed without any explanation.” Lee said they lent the mag over 60 pieces.

Elle’s site instructs readers to pick up the print issue on newsstands “for a list of complete fashion credits” while mentioning, “Beyoncé wears Ivy Park throughout.”

But Lee said: “If you look at what’s up online right now, it’s implying that everything there belongs to another company. We’re a dance manufacturer in The Bronx. We’re talking about Beyoncé and Topshop sharing a little bit of credit.”

An Elle rep said, “The format of the story was modified solely to benefit user experience and showcase the content.”

Meantime, a KD rep snarked of the Beyoncé brouhaha: “It’s complete greed. It’s disgraceful that they could not share even a fashion credit with a ‘Made in USA’ minority-owned clothing line.”

Bey’s rep told us no one from her team asked to have the credits removed in the Elle story.

Source: http://pagesix.com/2016/04/14/clothing-line-accuses-beyonce-of-playing-dirty-with-mag-credits/
 
According to WWD, Amy Astley (Teen Vogue) is the new Editor of Architectual Digest and a team of editors will run Teen Vogue.
 
This to me is another move which points to the rumour that they're bound to go up in smoke sometime soon. Either that or they're cutting corners. Amy has been doing pretty well at Teen Vogue. It makes sense that they'll shift her to another title. I really don't care for AD, such a dull delusional magazine.

Sounds to me like CN is taking a leaf out of Dior's books? I'd actually be keen to see what Teen Vogue will look like in the coming months. I'm not totally against the idea of a group of editors running the magazine.
 
According to WWD, Amy Astley (Teen Vogue) is the new Editor of Architectual Digest and a team of editors will run Teen Vogue.


I'm a bit saddened by this news. Margaret Russell has been doing a terrific job at AD ever since she came aboard as Editor in Chief. I think the decision all comes down to social media/online presence and the fact that Anna Wintour only wants to work with people she can easily control. Of course for Amy this is a promotion, AD is certainly a bigger and more prestigious magazine than Teen Vogue, but it seemed to me she'd recently really upped her game at Teen Vogue. They've had a strong 6 months and their online footprint has steadily increased. Rumor has it they may soon do away with Teen Vogue in print and move entirely online.
 
To celebrate British Vogue's centenary year, Penguin/ Fig Tree has announced that editor-in-chief Alexandra Shulman is penning Inside Vogue: A Diary Of My 100th Year, a personal memoir charting the behind-the-scenes story of her life during the magazine's important anniversary.

From the preparations for the centennial issue and the opening of the National Portrait's landmark Vogue 100, A Century of Style exhibition, to the organisation of the big gala dinner and the filming of the BBC documentary (which is due to air in the autumn), Shulman is in the process of documenting all from the driving seat.

"It's written completely contemporaneously," said Shulman of the diary. "Most people write about the job they do after they stop doing it, but I wanted to write about how these days are live rather than in retrospect. The temptation, of course, is to correct yourself when you have seen that you were wrong about something, but I am resisting it which I hope will make the book interesting and truthful."

Inside Vogue: My 100th Year will be published by Penguin/ Fig Tree on October 27 2016.

Vogue.co.uk
 
Ooh, this sounds like something I'd like! Sounds like 'The September Issue, but with an intellectual touch. Alexandra is very well versed, so it's bound to be a treat. I would actually like to know exactly what the extent of her input was with that issue.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,271
Messages
15,294,071
Members
89,208
Latest member
leafyleaf
Back
Top