Given that POP was one of the places that incubated Mert & Marcus and their plastic-synthetic style, in order to differentiate Love from Pop, has Katie decided it's time to go in the other direction, where things are "not so retouched"?
Though generally, I like what's being talked about as the potential content. Speaking around the subject, there are many ways of rebelling through your appearance, from tattoos to hairstyles, and Beth Ditto demonstrates another form of physical rebellion. I hope Love can show us that unconformity is fantastic.
Couture Counter! Who's Going, Who's Not
Bazaar scales back, Elle switches things up, "Marie Claire does not attend the couture shows"
Friday, January 16, 2009
(NEW YORK) The haute couture shows will be the talk of Paris from January 26-28, but they'll receive less buzz in the American press this season. Oh, budget cuts! Harper's Bazaar editor in chief Glenda Bailey will squire only creative director Stephen Gan, while last season, market director Nicole Fritton and fashion news/features director Kristina O'Neill also attended. Elle's market director Joann Pailey will be the token representative from the magazine (last season, that role was filled by style director Kate Lanphear, who holed up at le Meurice). Alix Brown will be sole representative from T Magazine, while EIC Stefano Tonchi has also attended in the past. "Marie Claire does not attend the couture shows," a Hearst representative told The Daily. What, no Nina? All in all, it's good news for junior editors at French Vogue--salut, front row!
ASHLEY BAKER & ADAM P. SCHNEIDER
Are The Glossies Losing Their Luster?
January 20th, 2009 | Global
Despite glossy magazines' awkward attempts at channeling the "recession-chic" zeitgeist—or, maybe, because of them—it's glaringly obvious that their experiments with mixing high and low fashion finds are still heavily weighted towards the high. Those who understand the advertiser-editor relationship understand why big ticket items still claim the majority of page space in the glossies during a massive economic crisis—not to mention that the wealthiest of readers probably haven't yet started to feel the crunch. But, what about everyone else? By continuing to focus on the highest of fashion, are magazines alienating a readership for which luxury is an aspiration more out of reach than ever?
To find out, we took a (very unscientific) poll of our friends and acquaintances, in hopes of discovering whether the glossies are losing luster among their workaday readers—the answer to which was a resounding no.
Most of those surveyed claimed not to take offense at the continuing barrage of unattainable luxury paraded in the pages of their favorite magazines. "To be honest, I read the articles and admire the clothes, but that's where it ends," agrees an LA-based actress. "If I see something I really love, I tend to find a more inexpensive version somewhere else. I mean, even if the economy wasn't bad, I would still want designer bags that I can't afford!"
In fact, the only thing readers do seem to take issue with are the glossies' attempts at unearthing bargains. "I wish fashion magazines had more of a variety, regardless of the economy," says an Arizona marketing executive. "Some have 'recessionista' pages, but I find a lot of the less expensive items are still somewhat pricey for someone on a budget."
An LA writer agrees, saying: "I think condescending articles on 'bargain shopping'—wherein a writer or editor discovers a place called Target or sacrifices their bi-weekly blowout and lives to tell the tale—are what's offensive right now. And those seem to be everywhere. It is so archaic and so out of touch with the readership, who most likely are already aware that a pair of shoes can be had for less than $400, or that drugstore beauty products actually work."
The one thing that all those surveyed agree upon is that, in times like these, fashion magazines' escapist offerings are more important to them than ever. "I, for one, want to see the most expensive and insanely creative pieces of fashion even if I cannot afford them, not just what is available at the Gap," says a New York jewelry designer—a view with which the industry as a whole seems to agree. Take it from Karl Lagerfeld, who told BBC News: "If you want only things you can afford, it's boring. It's great to see things you may not buy—because you don't have the money—but it is very ugly to think they shouldn't exist because you can not buy them."
—Erin Magner
LIGHTWEIGHT MARCH ISSUES: As media agencies and analysts predicted, the first quarter of 2009 proved to be a bloody one for magazines. According to figures published today by Media Industry Newsletter, the large fashion and beauty titles saw an overall 22 percent decline in advertising pages in the first three months of the year, a reflection of the recession impacting print. From the high-fashion to the more mass titles, the dismal numbers demonstrate to what extent advertisers are staying on the sidelines until things improve.
Allure, for example, saw a 35 percent drop in ad pages to 214 pages in the first quarter, while Vogue declined 28 percent, or 218 pages, to a total of 563 for the period. Glamour declined 22 percent to 291, and W posted a 40 percent drop, or 218 ad pages, for the quarter, carrying 322 pages. Glamour’s 291 ad pages this quarter reflect a 22 percent slide. And as same-store sales at retailers continue to slide, shopping magazine Lucky saw a 35 percent contraction in ad pages, raking in 203 pages for the first quarter. The Condé Nast-owned titles do not discount their page rates to advertisers, a stance that in the short term could deter some advertisers (Condé Nast also owns WWD).
At Hearst Magazines, Town & Country has seen a 30 percent decline in the quarter: The magazine carried 247 pages for the first three issues of the year. Harper’s Bazaar carried 396 pages, a 21 percent decrease compared to 2008, while Cosmopolitan’s 305 pages are 48 pages, or 14 percent, below last year’s total. O, The Oprah Magazine reported a 20 percent slide in pages, to 305. Marie Claire is off 16 percent, totaling 214 ad pages. Meanwhile, Elle dropped 26 percent, gathering 435 pages through March. In Style, whose publisher, Lynette Harrison Brubaker, is leaving the Time Inc. title, reported a 29 percent drop in paging, to 436.
The health magazines continue to manage the ad slide better than their fashion counterparts, but have still suffered during the downturn. Shape is reporting an 8 percent decline in paging, to 312, while Self lost 50 pages, or 18 percent, during the quarter, reporting 234 ad pages through March. Women’s Health declined by 28 pages, or 19 percent, to 115. Fitness was the only magazine that reported a page increase, but that’s because the Meredith Corp. title added an issue this year. That bumped its total to 201 pages, or 30 percent more than in the first quarter 2008. Essence also fared better than its peers, recording a 6 percent decline in paging compared to last year, to a total of 266.
Building an independent media empire - exclusive interview
“I guess I started a magazine because I knew almost nothing about print.”
It may not sound like the best time to buy an entire magazine, but that’s just what Lothar Eckstein has done. Twice.
The founder and editor-in-chief of sleek magazine, in November he bought two of his favourite independent magazines, Qvest and Luna, from German company Mediakom, to create a stable of three fashion magazines under the umbrella of B20 Publishing.
He talked exclusively to the Blogsplosion, sharing tales of independence, economies of scale and the future of magazine advertising.
Your background is in advertising - what made you first want to get involved in magazines?
I started in advertising 20 years ago. But in advertising, you are always working on someone else’s baby. In the end, the client builds something, not you. Fifteen years ago, I moved into working in television and then the internet.
I guess I started a magazine because I knew almost nothing about print. I knew all the risks in television and the internet, and didn’t dare [create my own venture]. In print, it was the opposite.
When did you think you could make independent magazines your main business?
When I was working for big German publisher, Axel Springer.
Describe your magazines.
Luna is the only high-end children’s fashion magazine in Germany.
Qvest shows forward-looking fashion in a visually distinctive way, and will include some exciting new features with the launch of issue 37. With a circulation of 80,000, Qvest is by far the biggest serious magazine in its segment, in the German market.
Sleek is unique in exclusively combining art and fashion. Each issue has its own theme.
Why did you decide to acquire Qvest and Luna?
I always felt that it would be worth trying to strengthen independent titles by giving them a chance to profit from economies of scale. Like: Buy paper together. Print together. Distribute together and sell ads in Italy or France together. But remain editorially fiercely independent.
How much did you pay for the titles?
We paid too much, of course! What else can I say as a buyer?
Is B20 owned by you alone? Why the name B20?
I have two partners, Matthias Düwel and Marcus Meyer. The name? We wanted something modest. The brand is just a vehicle for business to business affairs. B20 stands for the 20s in Berlin, a time and place that the three of us are impressed by.
Did you change the editorial teams after taking over?
Yes. Annika von Taube moved up from Managing Editor to Editor in Chief for sleek - she replaces me. Adriano Sack will be in charge of Qvest as of Edition 37 together with Clark Parkin. They will take over from Tamara Rothstein and Ashely Heath, who I want to thank for what they achieved for Qvest over the last two years, very impressive work.
Have you made any changes to the magazines themselves?
There will be some changes linked with the new teams. But it is too early to tell what they will be.
Have you started to gain the economies of scale you had hoped for?
There are amazing savings, more than we expected.
Are you planning to create any new magazines? What kind of magazine would you like to add to these three?
Yes, we are. Or rather: Yes, we were. But given the financial crises, who knows what will happen…
What is the future of magazine advertising?
It helps to have a good online model to go with the print model. Being visually driven and using “haptics” to the max also helps. The most important thing is being small, though. The market will shrink, but it will continue to be big enough for small players to continue for a long time to come, especially in high-end, quality niches.
Source | Women's Wear Daily
I'm quite shocked by this, and sad that Rachel's issue didnt sell, it was a lovely cover and issue.Thanks for this info MMA.US Vogue Sales 2008
Best | November: Reese Witherspoon
Worst | October: Rachel Weisz
mediaweek.com / january 28, 2008Condé Nast Shutters Domino
Condé Nast made the long-expected decision to close Domino, the publishing company's three-year-old, hip shelter magazine. The March issue will be the last. The editor and publisher, Deborah Needleman and Beth Brenner, will leave the company. Some staffers are expected to be placed elsewhere in the company.
The Web site, also will be discontinued.
In making the announcement, company president/CEO Chuck Townsend said the decision was purely based on the softened economy, which has already claimed a handful of other shelter books. This year through February, Domino’s ad pages tumbled 51 percent to 22 percent, per the Mediaweek Monitor.
Launched in 2005, the title achieved a rate base of 800,000. But observers have said that in addition to the hard-hit housing market, the title had some difficulty explaining its positioning in the marketplace.