The Business of Magazines | Page 125 | the Fashion Spot

The Business of Magazines

She should focus her undivided attention on the main CR Fashion Book and improve on it first because heaven knows it badly needs some serious shaping up. I'm happy that she's expanding but imo, the bookazine is still in its premature stage and demands her 100% attention at the moment. We've been seeing lackluster editorials from her and what more now that her attention is divided between CR Fashion Book, CR Men's and Bazaar.

I actually wish Bazaar would've locked her down as Glenda's replacement. Initially the idea didn't made any sense to me, but she could focus on working withing a framework once again. All this freedom with CR Fashion Book and even Bazaar isn't helping her at all, everything is too scattered and the editing is really poor. Maybe a lot of has to do with status. I dont recall people buying into VP because of her specifically, but rather because the magazine's aesthetic as a whole. This is not the case with CR FB and those Bazaar features, sadly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The only good Bazaar editorial she has done was her first. Simplicity goes a long way. If she did that more often I could trust her with the helm of a mainstream publication but alas she is stuck in her old ways. In a way she's kind of like Madonna using tricks she used on the 90s long after they lost their shock value. A reinvention is needed. Now she's becoming a jack of all trades master of none. That lone editorial is the only good thing she's done since she left Paris. As much as I find the current Bazaar to be a total bore I'd still rank it above CR Fashion Book and that says everything.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I used to think she'd be a strange "fit" for an American magazine but a competent editor, but her editorials for Bazaar have been such an embarrassment that it's eroded the respect I've built up from all her days at Paris Vogue, and I don't think I've ever been that continually impressed by CR Fashion Book either.
 
^ I agree with MON, CR Fashion Book has been a missed opportunity...a rote, uneven offering. What could've been an independent bible of cult fashion-art renown has left many fans disappointed. Plus, her work - or name - for Bazaar hasn't been impactful as her previous work for Vogue Paris.

Now a male annual, in which she's said to, "prefer to err on the side of classics, insisting that 'fashion is the right jeans and the right T-shirt'"? This isn't sounding any more groundbreaking the first.
 
Why Vogue Italia's Franca Sozzani Believes Today's Fashion Magazines Are All The Same
By Declan Eytan - Contributor
2.17.2015 @ 12:19AM

She’s amongst the 12 women who have changed Italian fashion , and has transformed Italian Vogue from a catalog with barely any advertisers, into a visually appealing, globally recognized hit. Franca Sozzani has stood at the helm of the fashion bible for a record 26-plus years – and on top of that, the Mantova-born blonde is the editor-in-chief of Vogue Italia‘s menswear counterpart, L’Uomo Vogue, in addition to fulfilling the role of Condé Nast Italy Editorial Director since 1994.

I caught up with the fashion titan at Condé Nast’s Milan headquarters, where we discussed her role as Editorial Director, the person she’d like to take her spot after leaving Vogue and her opinion on the current state of menswear.

Most people know you as the editor-in-chief of Vogue Italia, but you’re also Editorial Director of Condé Nast Italy since 1994, overseeing the publisher’s portfolio of Italian magazines. What do your daily duties consist of?

Apart from Vogue, I spend most of my time overseeing Vogue Gioiello, Glamour and GQ, so I’ll have meetings regarding those magazines, and meet with their respective editors from time to time. The Editorial Director is the person who needs to find a solution for any problem that may occur on an editorial level, by consulting to the magazine its editor-in-chief. An Editorial Director can’t ever force an editor to do something however. I’ll say what I think works or not, but the final responsibility lies with the editor.

Has there ever been a time in which you had to step in as Editorial Director, before it was too late?

GQ has gone through several stages that haven’t been easy; at a certain point the magazine was a bit lost. But now there’s a new editor-in-chief, Carlo Antonelli, who has taken the magazine into a different direction. So he gets the credits, considering he’s the editor, not I.

Throughout your career at Condé Nast, you’ve become notorious for touching sensitive topics such as institutional racism and domestic violence, through the pages of Vogue Italia. Are there any specific topics you feel need to be discussed at the moment? Yes, there’s still a lot of things I want to talk about, in my own way (laughs). It all starts with a question I ask myself, which then results into a magazine, with the right images shot by great photographers. With the Black issue for example, I asked myself, “How come there are millions of models coming from a country like Ukraine, but there are no models coming from the entire continent of Africa?”

So what’s one of those things you currently feel isn’t right in fashion?

Lately we’ve been seeing a lot of beautiful clothes at fashion shows, but you don’t understand any more at which designer you are exactly. There’s too much overlapping. Of course, when I go to a show like Prada I can see the signature all the way down to the shoes – but we don’t see signatures like that any more. The problem with clothes nowadays, is the same problem with magazines – they’re all the same. Nobody is willing to be courageous it seems, and head in their own direction. Not everybody may like what I do with Vogue Italia of course, but who cares?

In a previous interview we did, you mentioned how you could leave your post at Vogue Italia at any given time, after having served as the magazine’s editor-in-chief for over twenty-six years. When you think of the future of Vogue Italia under a new editor, are you scared of what might become of the magazine?

A new editor will probably change the direction of the magazine. The risk of it all is, that since I’ve done Vogue Italia in my own particular way, a successor might turn it into one of those commercial magazines instead, causing the title to potentially lose its essence. Anyhow, I have a ton of other things I want to do after my career at Vogue.

You have a successor in mind?

I hope it’s a person that has grown together with me inside the company. I have some people in mind, ’cause I think about it every now and then. It must be a fighter, ’cause not everybody is willing to fight. When I became the editor-in-chief in 1988, many people didn’t like Italian Vogue. During my first two years as the editor-in-chief, the magazine wasn’t successful at all. Those were two years of hell – we didn’t have any advertisers. I wanted to take the magazine in a different direction, which I knew could get me fired. But I still did it – and it worked out.

When was the last time you’ve been fearful of losing your job, as the result of a decision you made?

It’s never been the fear of losing my job actually. In the end, anybody can get fired at any moment. I was more fearful of the idea of having a concept which you believe is right, but not being able to go forward with it.

As of January 2007 you’re also the editor-in-chief of L’Uomo Vogue. What did you bring to the men’s title that wasn’t there before?

I wanted to change L’Uomo Vogue‘s image. The male models featured on its pages for example: It didn’t make sense to me, showing expensive clothes worth thousands, modeled by a seventeen-year-old kid. For women model’s work, since beauty is aspirational to them and they often judge other women based on their appearance. Men on the other hand are obsessed with success and achievement. They want to know what another man has achieved and how he has achieved it. So for a male audience, personalities are more effective than models.

You also put women on the cover of L’Uomo Vogue occasionally, but not in the typical men’s magazine, sexualized kind of way.

Exactly. ‘Cause in any case, men are attracted by women..

Usually..

Let’s say generally speaking (laughs). So putting a woman on the cover every now and then doesn’t hurt. I’ve always liked the idea of a woman wearing men’s clothing. I remember this time we did a shoot with Tilda Swinton and when it was almost time for her to go on set, she looked at herself in the mirror and gasped: “I look like my father!..” (laughs). I like the concept of women wearing the coat or blazer of their partner.

Would you say menswear has become more interesting than womenswear lately?

I see much more movement in menswear. In womenswear we’ve already experimented with almost everything. Men have more limits however, but step by step their style is getting more colourful. But to be honest, it used to be that way in the seventies as well. It’s after that era, that men started uniform dressing.

Do you believe Italian men are still world’s best-dressed?

I don’t want to generalize. It’s like when people talk about the English gentleman, but when you go to London the men are dressed incredibly boring. I think it’s more about the person, than his location. When you go in Africa for example, you have the Sapeurs in Congo – they’re amazing.

So dressing well is not part of Italian culture you say?


When you go to Naples for example, you’ll find these impeccably dressed elder gentlemen. But it’s a niche group of people. So if we talk about these niche groups, yes, Italian men dress better than foreigners. The thing with Italian men is that they have a greater obsession with beauty than foreign men. They’re more narcissistic. They’re playboys.

Source: Forbes.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not SELF, please! :( What will happen to Joyce??

Condé Nast: More Magazine Closures Ahead?

July 23, 2015
By Alexandra Steigrad

Is Condé Nast planning a surprise September?
Rumors at One World Trade Center are swirling that the company is planning to further cut costs and is focusing on Self and Details.

According to sources, Self could merge with Allure, or the fitness-centric magazine could fold altogether. The same rumor has been floated about Details merging with fellow men’s title GQ. Others speculated that Details may shutter, but that’s been longstanding speculation in the halls of Condé that seems to be lore at this point.

Self, however, has been generating more buzz than usual, after Condé Nast tried shopping the magazine around earlier in the year, according to multiple sources. There weren’t any takers, and instead of closing the magazine, the company pushed forward with a redesign under editor in chief Joyce Chang, who was brought in last year. Like most new editors, Chang reshuffled the masthead and has focused on tweaking the ethos of the magazine.

Self’s new identity, which sidestepped its fitness-centric roots to include more fashion and self-improvement, hasn’t found much favor with readers or advertisers, sources have indicated. Covers depicting fashion models posing in athletic apparel, which were chosen by Chang and Condé Nast artistic director Anna Wintour, didn’t grab new dollars at the newsstand.

Although most magazines are struggling at the newsstand, the fitness-centric magazine has been steadily losing sales. Self started the year with 104,186 in newsstand sales in January, according to the Alliance for Audited Media, but that number slid to almost 74,000 in February and March. Sales fell further in April and slumped to 58,788 in May.

While declining to comment on the speculation or give exact figures, a Self spokesman said that ad pages in the September issue are up 108 percent year-on-year, although they were flat in July and in August. Year-to-date, the spokesman said, Self has 31 new advertisers in print and digital ad revenue was up in the second quarter and significantly in the third. According to ComScore data the spokesman quoted, Self’s score in June was up 38 percent over June 2014 and 20 percent in May over May 2014. The May Magazine 360 audience is up 5 percent year over year and the year-to-date figure is up 1.2 percent, he said.

The timing of any potential shakeup is likely linked to the timing around last year’s cost cuts. In June, word of budget cuts began to trickle out at the beginning of the summer. Condé Nast began its budget slashing in August when it spun off Lucky in a joint-venture with Beachmint, and combined Bon Appétit and Epicurious. That same month, it sold Fairchild Fashion Group, parent of WWD, to Penske Media Corp.

This year, sources pointed to budgetary meetings for 2016, and indicated that the company’s business is down over 2014.

Asked about the speculation over magazine closures and budgetary concerns, a company spokesman said: “Our audience of 120 million consumers is bigger than ever. Sounds to me like we’re doing something right.”

Source: WWD.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That sucks. I really did love the new Lucky and the new Self. Maybe the Anna Wintour touch isn't all mighty but I sure do like it. Even Glamour seems better since Anna recommended Jillian Davison be fashion director.
 
Sad about Details possibly shutting down, but I can't imagine anyone would be shocked that's being discussed. If they had a better online presence, I think they'd be safer, but unlike GQ, they don't have articles or online content that "go viral".
 
I can't say I'd be sad about Self closing. I don't think it has that much to offer in this day and age, with fitness and lifestyle blogs galore. I've actually never met or heard of anyone who reads that magazine.
 
How do independent magazines make money?

A number of independent fashion magazines are leading a so-called ‘print renaissance’ in an increasingly digital world. How are they making it work?

london, united kingdom — in our increasingly digital world, where the average time spent with print magazines has fallen 19 percent in the past five years, according to a report by media agency zenith optimedia, it is often observed that independent fashion magazines are nonetheless seeing a resurgence. Today, newsstands have never looked so inviting. Rainbow rows of matte-papered, ice cream coloured fashion magazines cover every inch of space.

Journalist ruth jamieson has compiled a book of the world’s best independent magazines, magculture has organised conferences on them and the london edition hotel has created a dedicated independent magazine library, featuring a host of indie magazines. But what are the business models behind these titles?

The most obvious revenue stream available to titles is the cover price of the magazine. “it has been my number one rule here that we never ever sold a magazine at a loss,” said masoud golsorkhi, founder and editor-in-chief of tank magazine, an innovatively-designed, ideas-focused, independent fashion title. “if we couldn’t rely on copy revenue, i would just close shop immediately,” he continued. The first issue of tank, launched in 1998, was paid for wholly by cover price, though golsorkhi comments, “that model in its strictest form is not hugely sustainable if you want to scale up and are producing a niche product that is not going to be selling hundreds of thousands of copies.”

“the cover price pays for distribution and printing and a little bit more," said penny martin, the editor of the gentlewoman, a biannual intelligent women’s fashion magazine, launched in 2010, that today has a circulation of 96,000. But martin added that the majority of the magazine’s revenue comes from its strong relationships with advertisers. The gentlewoman counts brands céline, miu miu, balenciaga saint laurent, gucci and prada amongst its advertisers, for whom the magazine’s tactile print quality is a part of what makes it a desirable place to market their brands.

“paper is a luxury material and i think that consuming our magazine is a luxurious experience. It is very different from the way that you engage with online content,” said martin, who said that working in print builds a different, more desirable relationship with readers than online. “it extends to things like the quality of the photography and the production and the way it is graphically designed — it’s a very time-consuming operation, which extends to the way we want to engage with our readers.”

for canadian menswear magazine inventory, which transitioned from online to print, traditional advertising was a means of securing a revenue stream. “at the time it was really tricky to figure out how to do online advertising,” inventory’s editor ryan willms told bof. “even though the print industry was in a bit of a declining state, there was still more of a traditional sense of advertising buying in print.” advertising is now inventory magazine’s main revenue stream.

But, with the relatively small distribution of some independent magazines — many media kits do not even include circulation numbers — not every print publication can depend on traditional advertising alone.

Some independent magazines have turned to branded content and other forms of native advertising to bolster their business models. “you’ll have a video on youtube and you’ll have an event at london fashion week together and it will be more of a 360 degree collaboration,” said becky smith, editor and creative director of twin, a luxury biannual bookzine with a circulation of 45,000 that champions female creatives and features cutting-edge editorials. “the advertising space is limited and has a limited revenue. It’s about approaching a brand and giving them something bespoke and curated, with a twin twist," she added.

A number of independent publications, including inventory and kinfolk, a quarterly magazine based in portland that celebrates the ‘slow lifestyle’ and features contemporary illustrations, charming photography and intimate interviews with creatives, have also been able to leverage their brand and point of view as curators of products, tapping transactional revenue by setting up online and brick and mortar stores. Inventory magazine has an online store that has stocked menswear brands including margaret howell and john smedley, and now sells independent publications. Willms noted that this has “contributed to inventory [being seen] as a brand rather than just a publication.”

events are another way for independent magazines to make money. Kinfolk, which operates international editions in japan, china, korea and russia, hosts a vast programme of events internationally through relationships with partners across the globe — from sydney to seoul. Jeremy leslie, founder of magculture, described these events as an “enormously powerful [tool]. People buy into the brand explicitly and they want the full kinfolk experience. It doubles back into the magazine and makes them money along the way.”

also harnessing the power of events is the calvert journal, an independent magazine with a focus on the post-soviet world, funded by the calvert 22 foundation, a non-profit organisation looking to promote the contemporary art and culture of eastern europe, which produces an annual print issue, supported by daily features, news and photography online. The magazine has built strong relationships with a number of brands, working closely with the likes of nike to host events and organising global digital-journalism master classes with british newspaper the guardian. “our plan has been to create a viable, editorial proposition, with the idea that that helps us build enough cachet and unique visitors to begin talking commercially to brands,” editor ekow eshun told bof.

Some magazines, like near east, an independent art and fashion publication from istanbul, are still building their business models. “it’s a very specialist magazine,” explained mihda koray, the magazine’s publisher and editor. “there will only be a handful of people that understand what we are doing [with near east] but with their support we can keep it going.” koray is looking to private investors who feel passionate about the magazine as a cultural project, not a business prospect, but she currently self-funds the publication with revenue secured from a previous project curating a gallery in istanbul. For koray, her print publication — though respected within the industry and stocked at major fashion spots such as dover street market — remains a labour of love.

For others, like system — a visually rich biannual fashion publication known for its story-telling editorial style — creating a profitable business was never the aim. “we didn’t do the magazine in order to make money, or to start a business on the side with a creative agency," said elizabeth von guttman, who runs the magazine alongside brand consultant alexia niedzielski, jonathan wingfield, ex-editor of numéro, and thomas lenthal, an art director who has worked for yves saint laurent.

Fabrice paineau, editor of the parisian magazine double, describes his publication as an “amateur professional magazine.” since its launch, double has become a reference point for emerging photographers, innovative styling and graphic design, featuring major industry names including juergen teller, david sims and terry richardson. However, each member of paineau’s small creative team has to maintain a job outside of the magazine.

But although some magazines don’t make money themselves, they can be powerful tools for other businesses. A number of magazines, including double, inventory and tank, have founded creative agencies. Twin also aims to launch creative services.

Tank has leveraged its creative agency to help bolster business since its fourth issue. “we’ve evolved as a business to offer a kind of consultancy service, a design agency service alongside our publication,” golsorkhi told bof. “it pays for the office and the staff and keeps the lights on, whilst the magazine pays for [its production] and makes a small profit.”

- source: Businessoffashion.com
 
T Magazine’s Fashion Issues Hit Record Numbers
By Kristen Heinzinger | July 27, 2015

Things are looking up for T, The New York Times Style Magazine. Their upcoming Women’s and Men’s Fashion issues saw a record number of advertising pages since one of publishing’s worst nightmares, 2008. T Women’s Fashion, out August 23rd, saw a 4% increase over last year, and will include 12 first-time advertisers including Stuart Weitzman, Kenzo, J Brand and Marni. T Men’s Fashion, available September 13, increased 10% over last year and 27% since 2013, with new ads à la J Crew, Bruno Magli, Piquadro, Gant, Jeffrey Rudes and Samuel Hubbard Shoes. Year-to-date (not including Men’s Fashion), T is up 8% in paging (55 pages!) over the last year. After 13 years at Condé, GQ associate publisher Brendan Monaghan joined The Times as the very first publisher of T and VP of luxury advertising in 2013. Earlier this year he was promoted to SVP advertising at the Gray Lady. His title at T remain the same.

Source: Fashionweekdaily.com
 
WSJ Magazine September 2015 - The biggest issue ever

source: Kristina O'Neill, Editor in Chief WSJ
 
Prada’s major mistake hits September magazines

By Mara Siegler
August 23, 2015 | 11:29pm

September issues have hit the stands and we hear there’s trouble at Prada after the same dress ended up on Katy Perry’s Vogue Japan cover and Rosie Huntington-Whiteley’s Harper’s Bazaar UK cover, and caused a major headache at W.

A source tells us when W magazine discovered cover gal Gigi Hadid was in the same bow-adorned frock, they scrambled to pull the shot and replace it with a different photo. Insiders tell us editors are furious because September issues are the most important of the year, and each magazine expected to have the garment as an exclusive.

The dress also appears inside Marie Claire and InStyle, and Lily Donaldson wears a similar version on Elle UK’s August cover. W’s Stefano Tonchi insists they didn’t switch the cover over the garment drama.

“I always choose the cover image that I think is the strongest, and it’s selected independently of what the subject is wearing,” he tells us. We hear the rep responsible for the same item being sent everywhere has left Prada and has a job at another fashion house. Reps for Prada had no comment.

Source: PageSix.com
 
^That story is complete rubbish... Every season the sane garments are used over and over by every magazine.
 
Anyone else having problems accessing the opened Sept issues from Vogue Archive? It won't let me in no matter what i do!
 
^same here.

I just received an email from Vogue Paris and it makes me wonder if they are trying to change something or if they have some difficulties these days because they asked me to answer a bunch of questions about the September issue: do I like the cover? Do I like the model on the cover? How much time did I spend reading the issue? Do I like the eds inside? Did I just look at the pictures or just read the entire issue? From how many years or months do I read Vogue? Too much ad? Not enough fashion?

I find it kind of weird... They showed me a picture of every single ed and I had to rate them from 0 to 10.

What do you guys think?
 
I think they noticed how drastic the changes were and how it affected the readership. It used to be 70s but you still see the VP seductive aesthetic before but now it's just dead. When you look at the September Issue, you get 3 VP themes: the old seductive sexual one, the periodic era, and the wtf this isn't self service theme. So I think they want to know which appeals more to the readers? I'll give Born To Be Wild a 9 because it's the VP I want. Give Suzanne's a 0 because I reject her ideas and vision for VP. Let it be known to them lol.

If my theory is correct, it's about time they finally realized to get the sentiments of the readers and finally act upon it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
^yeah that's basically how I rated the eds. I'm hoping for some change after that. And mainly a model change because this can't go on anymore. I'm tired of seeing the same models every year. But if there is no change, at least as you said MON, they realized it.
 
Well are they really in trouble though? Come to think of it, 2015 was the year they became full-fledge self-service. Maybe there was a noticeable decline from the first half of 2014 to the first half of 2015. It's normal for magazines to have surveys... But to ask readers to rate editorials and I they like the model... Yikes. The implication is: what do you want us to remove? What do you want to see more of? So maybe before changing something drastically again, they first want to know what the readers like to see first. But isn't the answer obvious?

It's nice to see them realizing that the "FORMULA" is no longer working. To be honest, if I were them, I would've included "do you like the photography?" To give an end to Mert & Marcus
 
They asked that too. They were also asking if you think that they are different from other magazine, if it inspires you ect ect
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,256
Messages
15,293,363
Members
89,190
Latest member
noaueu
Back
Top