The Business of Magazines | Page 160 | the Fashion Spot

The Business of Magazines

Edward deserves to be given a fair chance, his first issue is not even out yet, and the UK press is already snipping at him, smh. How predictable!!

I certainly side eyed him for his celebrity appointments, Naomi Campbell will not be putting the hours in, at the office, but CN top people knew that when they let him hire all of them. Who knwos, maybe it works out!

Shulman should just move on with her career, and deal with the fact her legacy at Vogue is marred with such lack of diversity, it's a fact!
 
^I was under the impression that they hired Kate and Niomi for the PR/"edge" they would get, not the hours put in anyway.
 
It's not just Kate and Naomi, there's also Adwoah and McQueen. Then some fanfare names such as Brokaw and Pat McGrath. This for me is not a dream team because many won't deliver. Unless he's gunning for an exclusively visual magazine, that is.
 
Apparently there's talk of Jon Stewart for Vanity Fair???? :o God forbid! Maybe this ridiculous rumour was started by CN to distract from all the Janice Min news.
 
Meet W’s New Guard: Rickie De Sole and Sara Moonves

By Alexandra Ilyashov | September 22, 2017

Edward Enninful’s departure left a big void at W—or a huge opportunity! Just ask the title’s newly installed fashion brigade: Fashion Director Rickie De Sole and Style Director Sara Moonves.

Congrats on the promotion, Rickie. How did it happen?
I worked closely with Edward Enninful, and when he left, Stefano [Tonchi] really wanted to put together a team. I’m working with all the creatives to make sure things run seamlessly, so they’re not shooting the same looks, and so we’re telling all the stories we want to tell.

What’s your rapport like with Stefano?
Stefano is the best boss you could ask for, on the record! No, but truly—he’s incredibly trusting, and willing to take risks. He’s open to hearing opinions. That’s why we work with such a roster of talents; they can come and play here.

Has your work at W been all that different from what you were doing at Vogue?
Completely. I was only covering accessories at Vogue, and I wanted to grow. I want to be the first person to help get behind young talents. Knowing what’s next is such a big part of the W vocabulary.

Do you feel edgier these days?
I’m not an edgy person, which I think Stefano was aware of when he hired me. I certainly have not become grungier while working here, besides wearing more black. But I think that side of me is in there; I am who I am. I appreciate fashion but am not necessarily going to embrace it on a personal level.

Do you ever worry what this job will look like in five or 10 years?
Don’t we all? [Laughs] Yes, I think everything is changing at such a fast pace, and that’s why it’s important to do all the amazing things that we’re doing now. Stefano does these hardbound editions of two of our issues this year, which makes them like coffee table books. The real estate in W is really unique.

Thoughts on how other media behemoths have “hubbed” jobs across titles?
Certain parts of [Condé Nast] have already been consolidated, like the publishing side—our team works on W and Vanity Fair—but it hasn’t had an effect on our jobs. We’ve heard many rumors [about consolidation] at this point, but they’re just rumors. But I love a challenge—whatever happens, that or something else, you have to take it in stride.

How do you know a designer’s going to make it big?
If people at Condé Nast start wearing it, which is what happened with CVC Stones. We have this French jewelry assistant, Schanel [Bakkouche], who found this designer, Pascale [Monvoisin], and started wearing it; then I did; then one of the Vogue girls started wearing it, then it’s like, well, it’s a thing. If people want to wear it that work in fashion and have access to everything within reason, there’s something there, that’s the No. 1 indication for me.

How has the retail landscape changed during your career?
I still love stores, and I keep saying that, but at the same time, I find myself shopping online more and more. I like shopping at destinations, especially resort boutiques. Even if it’s also sold at Bergdorf Goodman, it somehow feels more special if you found it in an island shop.

It’s a challenging time for department stores. Thoughts?
There are so many brands; there’s a lot out there. Websites like MatchesFashion and Net-a-Porter do such a nice job curating it all. There are clever ways to do that in a physical store, like Bergdorf’s did with Linda’s and Saks’ The Wellery. It’s all about the experience.

PLUS! Sara Moonves Weighs In…

What brought you to W?
I met with Stefano when all the changes began, and I’ve been such a huge admirer of his and what an incredible, iconic magazine W is. I loved working at Vogue, but I thought this was such an amazing new chapter. Rickie was a great collaborator at Vogue, and I think that for both of us at W, it’ll be great to expand that relationship.

What’s going to be different about this gig?
W is so experimental, and I’m excited to take risks I couldn’t take a Vogue. And W does such a great job at combining different cultural elements, like art and entertainment, and I’m excited about that. Stefano is really into giving people a chance, and that sort of freedom makes W, W. We talked about my interest in photographers and directors. Stefano and I both have a love of film, and we talked about new directors and how we can do things for digital and print and encompass all the things we love.

Will you continue working on side gigs while at W?
W’s going to be my primary focus, absolutely, but I’m still going to be working with a few select advertising clients.

Who are you tight with in fashion?

I’ve been working in fashion since I was young, and I grew up with a lot of the young designers, who actually aren’t so young anymore—Jack [McCollough] and Lazaro [Hernandez] from Proenza, Mary-Kate and Ashley [Olsen] from The Row, Laura and Kate Mulleavy [from Rodarte]…these are people I’ve known since they started their careers, and it’s amazing to see them take off.

Who are you betting on big as the next-gen in fashion?
I was obsessed with what Shayne [Oliver] was doing at Hood By Air; I’m excited to see what he does at Helmut Lang. Vaquera is interesting, and I can’t wait to see how they expand. It’s exciting to see brands like Brock and Adam Selman expand, too.

Did your Hollywood upbringing [as the daughter of CBS honcho Les Moonves] shape your fashion POV?
Growing up in L.A. I have a huge interest in Hollywood. I left to go to New York the second I could because I didn’t want to be in the entertainment industry! But I do have a love for film, TV, and music. I’ve admired the incredible Lynn Hirschberg for so long, and I think the conversation about the industry at W is really about new, interesting talent and championing young actors, musicians, and directors early in their careers.

Source: Fashionweekdaily.com
 
they both seem very open and realistic about their roles and the industry, which is refreshing, i'm interesting to see what the new W will look like, the issues i've seen over the past year all struck me as alarmingly thin.
 
An online version that'll focus on beauty? Ah, you mean posting up corporate PR about this week's new miracle mascaras and foundations, without having to worry about printing costs or returning clothes to whoever you got them from.
 
Well this is a shock. I thought Glamour UK was one of the most popular magazines in the world (mostly thanks to its compact size). I guess they were suffering with numbers and tried to improve things with the new size and look, but things have gotten worse. I haven't bought Glamour in ages but am really sad whenever a print edition ceases.
 
There is only so successful a £1 magazine can be on the newsstand. There has to be hardly any profit in that, surely?!
 
Crikey, I'm floored! This is such an important edition in the UK and a huge loss for us. Nobody is safe! What I want to know is why Glamour, and not Marie Claire, who nobody will miss? Yet when I think about it now, the writing was on the wall. Two months ago they had an 'Instagram' issue, and they always seemed overfond of those annoying Youtube vloggers. What's the point of turning out a print form if your target audience lives online and won't even part with a pound?

You know who will never go bust? Harper's. Because they're targeting a group who not only value print, but actually buy whatever's being flogged. I hope this is a rude awakening for Edward Enninful. Youth is not the answer. It's time magazines start acknowledging the 35+ squad!
 
Marie Claire is surviving on skeleton staff and it’s global name. Time Inc shuttered InStyle as they knew the audience was there for it online. Marie Claire’s isn’t, so the magazine stays open and slowly descends into being almost nothing. I think the move with Glamour is preemptive personally. They knew they couldn’t survive in the coming years and so made the decision to try and build something that was going to be sustainable.

I think the way the average person consumes magazines has shifted personally. They buy almost no magazines but when they do, they want it to be an event, so may go for Vogue or Elle because it’s freebies. They’re not swayed by an easily disposable publication like Glamour. That’s definitely what I’ve experience with my friends. They don’t buy magazines each month but on the off chance they do, they go for one of the super glossies. So it all feels like a bit more of an event.
 
Cosmo going to £1 probably didn't help. And why pay for a magazine when you can get stylist/shortlist etc for free who produce better content weekly than a magazine that's monthly and £2.

I agree re Harpers. They know who their audience is, what they want and they are an audience who grew up buying magazines so it's in their shopping habit DNA to continue...
 
Edward Enninful, British Vogue’s First Black Editor, Is Making Waves
by Tom Sykes

Edward Enninful is Vogue UK’s first black male editor. His staffing changes have led to a ‘posh purge’ of top staff.

Vogue House, in London’s Hanover Square, has enjoyed something of a reputation as one of the last redoubts of the British upper classes over the years.

But the revolving doors may be admitting significantly fewer Lords, ladies and 'honourables,' as the sons and daughters of peers of the realm are known, after what might be called a posh purge by the new editor of British Vogue, Edward Enninful.
Enninful made headlines when he was appointed to the editorship of Vogue, understandably so, given he is not just a man but also black, two firsts in a Vogue editor.

He is also of working class, immigrant origins, and could hardly have a more different backstory than the previous incumbent of the post, Alexandra Shulman.
Shulman was the white, privileged, upper-class daughter of two affluent writers. She grew up in Belgravia (just down the road from the Vogue offices) and her sister married a British Marquess. She filled the pages and offices of Vogue with people like her.

Enninful was born in February 1972 in Ghana and moved to the then shady area of Ladbroke Grove along with his parents and five siblings as a baby. His mother was a seamstress, so he had exposure to textiles from an early age, but his entrée to the high fashion world came after he was a scouted as a model.

Since 2011, Enninful has been the Creative and Fashion Director of the American fashion magazine W, and before that he was Fashion Director of the avant-garde British title i-D (a position he was appointed to at the tender age of 19).
Enninful was a London club kid of the 80’s and 90s, and his i-D shoots often featured thrift shop finds.

Now, as editor of Vogue, he has been accused of overseeing an exodus of the ‘posh girls’ who Shulman and her ilk would have seen as Vogue’s lifeblood.

Among the first casualties were the magazine’s former deputy editor Emily Sheffield (the daughter of a baronet, and Samantha Cameron’s sister) and its longtime fashion director, Lucinda Chambers.

Chambers, perhaps ill-advisedly, let off some steam in an interview with the fashion blog Vestoj in which she declared, "Truth be told, I haven't read Vogue in years. The clothes are just irrelevant for most people—so ridiculously expensive."

At another point in the interview, she said: "The June cover with Alexa Chung in a stupid Michael Kors T-shirt is crap. He's a big advertiser so I knew why I had to do it. I knew it was cheesy when I was doing it, and I did it anyway."

Enninful took over the reins officially on August 1, and has set about restocking the offices with a younger, cooler, more diverse representation of British talent.

Naomi Campbell, Kate Moss and Oscar-winning director Steve McQueen were announced as Contributing Editors.

Campbell criticized the lack of diversity at the publication under Shulman’s tenure by posting a photo of Vogue’s staff under her leadership. Astonishingly, it showed there were no black employees in a workforce of around 50.

A blogger writing for the Spectator under the pseudonym Pea Priestly claimed that Vogue was “borderline racist” during Shulman’s reign because it only had two covers featuring solo black models since 2002.

Enninful has not yet explicitly laid out his vision for Vogue. (He wasn't made available for comment for this article.) However, he has made clear his commitment to the digital side of the brand by launching a Vogue Snapchat account on his first day in the office, and by poaching the former publisher of GQ, Vanessa Kingori, who was hailed in the industry for her work on taking the British edition of the men’s mag digital.

Creating compelling video and social media look set to be priorities for Enninful’s new team. In the press release announcing his hiring, Condé Nast said: “Enninful is known to be an adept practitioner of video, whose recent video entitled "I Am An Immigrant," featuring fashion industry professionals, went viral. He is widely followed on social media.”

Enninful was certainly quick to recognize which way the digital wind was blowing. He said in a 2012 interview with Business of Fashion, “A good stylist can work in any medium whether its still photography or moving image. But it adds another facet to the whole job of styling. The times have changed so much and still images can’t just sell on their own anymore. I think for every shoot we do, we have to think about how it moves. That’s with us now and it’s going to be like that for a long time."

At W, Enninful was known for his skill at conflating accessibility and exclusivity. “What we all aim for is to make it more approachable, but that doesn’t mean low end,” he said.

Enninful’s critics have accused him of being more interested in surrounding himself with celebrities and the accoutrements of a fashionable life than anything else.

Chief among these critics has been Shulman herself—and this week she reignited the feud by taking a thinly-veiled swipe at Enninful.

Shulman, writing in Business of Fashion, hit out at what she described as a new guard of editors who, she said, were no longer magazine journalists but instead “celebrities or fashion personalities with substantial social media followings”.

She concluded that editing was “certainly not a job for someone who doesn’t wish to put in the hours and thinks that the main part of their job is being photographed in a series of designer clothes with a roster of famous friends”.

Shulman also appeared to criticize Enninful’s new contributing editors, writing: “It has been interesting and educative to see over the years which of the more dilettante or famous contributors really put some effort into their contributions and which liked the idea of an association to the magazine without the tedious business of actually doing any work.”

Few could level that accusation at one of Enninful’s key new hires: Vogue’s incoming fashion director, Venetia Scott.

Scott was for many years the chief stylist for her boyfriend, the fashion photographer Juergen Teller, and then ran an independent studio noted for its edgy, envelope-pushing work. She has also brought a trusted collaborator, Poppy Kain, with her to Vogue, a source says.

“Vogue had become very boring and very Sloaney, with lots of features on rich women’s houses,” says a source who knows Scott well. “Venetia couldn’t be more different. She is super creative and very hard working, so it’s going to be very interesting to see what she does. She goes a long way back with Edward, and they are both interested in always trying to push boundaries, and be ruder or naughtier. The reality is that with so much free content online, if you buy a magazine these days it needs to be really amazing.”

Although attention has naturally gravitated towards those who have been let go from the magazine, there are some old timers still in situ who are positively engaged with the new regime.

“There are lots of people still there who are excited about the change in direction,” says the source.

Undeniably, however, the overall head count at British Vogue has been massively reduced, which has hurt morale. One insider said Enninful’s appointment had merely provided a convenient moment to reduce staff numbers as digital and financial pressures increase year on year.

Condé Nast declined to make an official comment about the personnel changes at Vogue, or to provide an estimate of how many non-white people now work at Vogue.
However one insider at the company said: “In regard to the staff of British Vogue being offered voluntary redundancy this is something that was in the pipeline prior to Edward Enninful’s arrival, and follows some restructuring completed with other brands in the company.”

Another source said: “Yes, there are going to be less posh girls working at Vogue but that’s because every editor remakes the magazine in their own image, and Edward’s a working class black guy from Ladbroke Grove. The only question that really matters now is, can he make it work?”

For any Sloanes feeling persecuted, Condé Nast still has their backs. The November issue of Tatler (whose offices are one floor down in Vogue House) boasts the defiant headline: “WILD, SEXY, FREE! Posh girls have more fun.”
source | thedailybeast
 
Am I the only one who thinks all the articles on Vogue's staffing changes are getting a little ridiculous? It seems natural to me that when an editor leaves after 25 years there will be a shift in the team. Of course a new editor is going to want to breathe new life into the magazine by bringing in new people; and as Edward is so established in the industry it makes complete sense to me that he wants to create a team of people he knows and trusts to collaborate with.

I just don't think it's as dramatic as all these people are trying to make it seem, I think it's exciting. Why bother hiring someone who is just going to do the exact same thing as their predecessor? There is an opportunity to shift things, so go for it; especially after we've had the same vision for a quarter of a century.

I also think there's a bit too much fuss over the contributing editors, it's not like he's hired Gigi Hadid as the fashion director or something, that would be worth all the brouhaha people are making. This is fashion, why not add a bit of sparkle and celebrity to the whole thing? It makes sense to me to have famous (and legitimately iconic) supermodels and artists linked to a magazine like Vogue, it actually feels very old school and glamorous. I don't even thinks it really matters how much real work they do, it's not about that. As long as the full time staff are a solid, hard-working team and it's not only about celebrity name-dropping then I think it's fabulous to have Naomi and Steve and Kate on board every now and then. Why not? Let's have some fun with it.

As long as Edward backs all of this up with a strong vision, excellent content (both visual and written) then I'm all for these changes. I have a lot of faith in him.
 
UK Vogue's been staffed by posh people for more years than anyone can remember, it was almost regarded as a sort of finishing school for girls from a certain background. So this isn't just a refreshing of faces around the office, it represents a social shift, in many ways.
 
I don't see why these celebrity hirings are such a huge media fuss, i'm assuming these celebrity appointments are mostly symbolic gestures anyway? Kate has been a contributing fashion editor for years and that so far has mostly involved styling her own shoots. I don't think the 'posh' staff out of a job have been too hard done by either, of course it's never a nice feeling to be let go from a job, but British Vogue has been especially tone deaf to diversity both in their magazine and in the staff they hire for so long this is really the only appropriate course of action.
 
Does anyone know why Alexandra never chose Meisel under her helm? He has worked for British Vogue before her arrival.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,367
Messages
15,299,352
Members
89,340
Latest member
kafyel
Back
Top