nigelraphe
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2020
- Messages
- 33
- Reaction score
- 44
After the debut season of Gabriella Hearst's Chloe collection, she is definitely appearing on my mind.
Forgive me for Armani, but I said what I said about Frida with my chest !Giorgio Armani and Frida Giannini are quite overrated.
He is just extremely commercial.^I am not Marc’s biggest fan but he has something. I don’t even know what it is, but he is maybe the most “fashion” designer.
I honestly agree. Looking back it's not really a surprise that his work wasn't as appreciated; when you're that forward-thinking and rigorous it's not going to immediately land with everybody. I'm just so happy that it worked out for him that he was able to ascend to Louis Vuitton, and have that level of creative freedom. He's genuinely earned it.The difference here is that Nicolas Ghesquière has always been a genius and people didn't know it back then, in spite of the low standards we have in fashion today, he still stands out from everything being done in that time and being done right now. He has always had his ups and downs, like every great designer or artist, but what is good, is the very best. I can't think of a more beautiful collection ever made than his SS13 for Balenciaga. He is the Picasso of our generation.
I don't know...what he did at Vuitton with the Murakami and Stephen Sprouse collaborations was pretty inspired. And the scale of a lot of the shows that he put on, both at his main line and Vuitton, was pretty impressive. You can't be the "cool/pop culture/zeitgeist" brand forever, so it's inevitable that the buzz around his brand dissipated. That being said, it's still a bit of a shock how fast it fell with all the downizing and store closings. I think back to that documentary Marc Jacobs & Louis Vuitton...what a totally different time. He met the moment, but the moment has passed.P.S.: I think 90% of people here really believed back then and believe right now even more than ever that Marc Jacobs is overrated. Heck yes he is and always was.
In my 12 years looking closely at fashion, I guarantee you most people are not really forward-thinking, but that applies to every single facet of life. Most people repell what is different and unknown (Nicolas can be a pretty weird designer), especially at the beginning, it is only until it becomes accepted with time, that people open up to it.I honestly agree. Looking back it's not really a surprise that his work wasn't as appreciated; when you're that forward-thinking and rigorous it's not going to immediately land with everybody. I'm just so happy that it worked out for him that he was able to ascend to Louis Vuitton, and have that level of creative freedom. He's genuinely earned it.
I don't know...what he did at Vuitton with the Murakami and Stephen Sprouse collaborations was pretty inspired. And the scale of a lot of the shows that he put on, both at his main line and Vuitton, was pretty impressive. You can't be the "cool/pop culture/zeitgeist" brand forever, so it's inevitable that the buzz around his brand dissipated. That being said, it's still a bit of a shock how fast it fell with all the downizing and store closings. I think back to that documentary Marc Jacobs & Louis Vuitton...what a totally different time. He met the moment, but the moment has passed.
I read Armani and I was in shock! You deserved to be attacked by bottles of Si fragrances for that ahahaha!Forgive me for Armani, but I said what I said about Frida with my chest !
He has total creative freedom at Vuitton. But it’s a different type of creative freedom.In my 12 years looking closely at fashion, I guarantee you most people are not really forward-thinking, but that applies to every single facet of life. Most people repell what is different and unknown (Nicolas can be a pretty weird designer), especially at the beginning, it is only until it becomes accepted with time, that people open up to it.
Do you really and honestly think he has creative freedom at Louis Vuitton? For some reason, I have never believed that. In fact, I believe he has less freedom there than he ever had at Balenciaga, which is ironic considering the fact that when he exited Balenciaga, he complained about the lack of creative freedom there. I think this solely because LV is a far bigger and more exclusive label than Balenciaga.