get fashion
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2010
- Messages
- 2,018
- Reaction score
- 3
D&G Fall 2011
UGLY!!!
style.com
UGLY!!!
style.com
Proof against your own point? It says "suitable for wear" or "suitable for easy wear". Just because something is physically capable of being worn doesn't mean it's suitable.
If you look further down:
"Something that can be worn".
wtf... surface to air
net-a-porter.com
But that's listed under "noun". If you read the original post, it was used as an adjective.
But as everyday shoes? Hell to the F*CK no!