honeycombchild
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2009
- Messages
- 8,841
- Reaction score
- 727
Once again the tiresome issue of 'relevance' is here. Blah, blah, blah. What you find 'relevant' and what someone else finds 'relevant' is entirely different. It's not a thing. You can't claim someone is or isn't relevant and have it be fact. It's all about perception.
You could argue that Madonna is relevant because of her past achievements and the fact she was the trail blazer just as easily as you could argue she is no longer selling records and has been effectively 'replaced' in the scene and therefore has no relevance.
There's a back and a forth for every single argument here, the only thing I find 'irrelevant' to be perfectly honest is the constant argument about relevance.
You could argue that Madonna is relevant because of her past achievements and the fact she was the trail blazer just as easily as you could argue she is no longer selling records and has been effectively 'replaced' in the scene and therefore has no relevance.
There's a back and a forth for every single argument here, the only thing I find 'irrelevant' to be perfectly honest is the constant argument about relevance.