Vanity Fair March 2015 by Annie Leibovitz

[Bobby153]

This is so boring & dull. Such a shame, I used to love their Hollywood issue (the 2010 & 2011 are my personal faves).

This is just looks awful, it looks like their not even in the same picture, like they all shot separately and were photoshopped together. I'd much rather have seen Sienna on the main cover than Reese, I find her whole all american good girl next door act SOO dull!!

...special shout to the token black guy! heyyy.

 

[kokobombon]

And really, Channing Tatum deserves a front cover -.-
They probably chose him because he's the only one that can pick up Amy.

I think they needed someone young and well known & liked... plus, he was in -Oscar nominated- Foxcatcher and 22 Jump Street did pretty good, didn´t it?

 

[Chiara 92]

 

[KoV]

They probably chose him because he's the only one that can pick up Amy.

lol, but I'm guessing Oscar, Miles, Benedict, and David would have no trouble.

 

[VogueGirl8910]

Typical Leibovitz, the cover is soo boring & basic.

 

[peachescream]

lol, but I'm guessing Oscar, Miles, Benedict, and David would have no trouble.

Poor Eddie.

 

[Alisa_Jd]

HOLLYWOOD ISSUEThe British Are Coming! by Jason Bell


ladyclow.tumblr.com

 

[Alisa_Jd]

 

[t-rex]

Is there a Leibovitz ed inside?

 

[Chiara 92]

I really like this year portfolio, some shots are amazing!

 

[Benn98]

The British rules!!! These portfolios are great, but it would've been much nicer if they diversified the locations. There are so many picturesque spots in Britian. Also, what have they done to poor Sally Hawkins and Gugu Mbatha Raw?? Sally looks really bad and I didn't even recognise Gugu.
I'd maybe have given Ruth or Sienna an OG shot as opposed to Emily.
And where's the Redgrave family (one of England's biggest acting dynasties) and Charlotte Rampling? This is such a commercial casting.