Both covers are lovely and I know this glossy aesthetic is their signature, but maybe just this once Luigi & Iango should've taken it to a slightly grittier and darker level. Maybe corpse bride/black widow. That's what I'm getting from Penelope's presence on the first cover but the styling and photography look commercial.
If I had to buy one, I'd probably go with the first cover.
She's beautiful, but these are just basic L&L portraits.
The kind they can do on remote, tbh.
I don't know why this magazine exists, other than to cover women from head to toe.
It really has no identity outside of that.
I adore Penelope and these covers, although nothing new, just deliver the kind of beautiful moodiness I could want from a glossy magazine. I don’t care if we’ve seen it before, I’ll take this over 95% of the crap being produced nowadays.
Second cover is stunning! Early 2000s Vogue cover quality. The third wasnt necessary at all. The first is nice though the Chanel is a little overkill but still looks better than most covers today.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.