Mr T.'s gonna be pissed when he sees his jewelry's missing.
I don't understand the Meisel editorial. Who are those people in the glass vitrines? Are they famous?
from what i've gathered from looking at the ed for like 5 mins, it's an inspection of counterculture kind of thing - the guys in the glass cages are a complete 180 from the girls on the outside, but still people, still "fashionable" for guys. so kind of like looking at sculptures of what cavemen look liked? similar yet different?
HTH, that's just my two cents though. i think it's an interesting concept.
Guinevere's edit is nice, but lately I've been noticing that VI has been doing single designer editorials, single Italian designer editorials. I counted two in the February issue (Roberto Cavalli and Gucci with Mariacarla) and now this all Prada edit. It's a little lazy, non?
Your concept is interesting. I think it is meant to be ironic: the people in glass look like totally normal everyday people and the models are dressed completely over the top. Really, the models should be the ones in glass being studied, but they are not. I think it is sort of a commentary on modern day style and the fashion of the young. The models represent the constant changing rate of fashion (they are slaves to fashion), while the people in glass are the normal clothes that that seem outdated by today's radical fashions, and thus museum-like.
In the end, though, I really don't know what the message is. Alls I know is that the clothes are totally fabulous and I love the styling. It is some of the best I have seen in VI in a while!