What Does Brexit Mean For Fashion In The UK? (PLEASE READ POST #1 BEFORE POSTING)

anlabe32

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2012
Messages
8,356
Reaction score
426
Moderator Note:

Please be very careful in this discussion. Keep it on topic ... how Brexit might impact the fashion industry in the UK. Avoid political discussions or opinions about whether this is a good move or a bad move, the politicians involved, or how it will impact people in general. Discussing politics is not allowed anywhere in the Fashion Spot, per our Community Rules.

Thanks!




For both mass market and high fashion?

I know it will be a while before everything is settled but I have a lot of questions.

Are the clothes getting more expensive?
Am I going to pay more for clothes from, for example, ASOS?
Will some brands, like McQueen, stop showing in the UK and come back to Paris?
Is London Fashion Week going to be less popular for models to walk?
Will photographers who are based in London, like Mert & Marcus, base themselves elsewhere (now that equipment, luggage and everything will be harder to get into the country)?

My knowledge of the business side of fashion is quite slim so I wonder about all these things. I read that for example the prizes of cars produced in the UK will increase with 10% for outside the UK.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't know if we can tell already. We have to wait until the British government discuss the terms of the exit... *** Edited: Please refrain from talking about political issues. See the Community Rules. ***
 
Last edited by a moderator:
*** Edited : Removing Response to deleted post. ***

So many aspects of this will impact the Fashion Industry! From jobs, to import, and so many other parts. **** Edited: Please refrain from talking about political issues. See the Community Rules. ***
 
Last edited by a moderator:
*** Edited: Please refrain from talking about political issues. See the Community Rules. ***

I also think none of the people who voted had insight deep enough to make an informed choice... I don't know how it is going to affect fashion and if I am completely honest I don't think I even care when there are more pressing issues at stake...However, I believe being open was great for the British fashion industry (which really exploded during last 30 years) because it was open to creativity... now try and get a work permit for conceptual artists, etc. and prove Theresa May that having these people in the country is essential;-) all I can do is hope that things will work out okay for everyone... I think we are facing very challenging times and the last thing we need is falling apart. I am sorry, my comment might come across a little emotional but as an immigrant who worked, employed and paid more taxes than Starbuck in this country I feel a little bit let down.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
*** Edited: Please refrain from talking about political issues. See the Community Rules. ***

For both mass market and high fashion?

I know it will be a while before everything is settled but I have a lot of questions.

Are the clothes getting more expensive?
Am I going to pay more for clothes from, for example, ASOS?
Will some brands, like McQueen, stop showing in the UK and come back to Paris?
Is London Fashion Week going to be less popular for models to walk?
Will photographers who are based in London, like Mert & Marcus, base themselves elsewhere (now that equipment, luggage and everything will be harder to get into the country)?

My knowledge of the business side of fashion is quite slim so I wonder about all these things. I read that for example the prizes of cars produced in the UK will increase with 10% for outside the UK.

As of now, things will unravel. Only once, and If a strong Prime Minister takes over, and is able to negotiate good laws which support easier way of doing business for UK brands things could be turned for the better. But it will never be the same for most brands. The freedom with which most companies operated, from hiring all over Europe, to exporting & producing their product? That all ends, there will be a much harder way now, and it will impact mostly the up and coming talent who don't have the help of huge powerful conglomerates behind them, to navigate through the obstacles that will face them! Young brands will feel it the most!Jobs will be lost, pay will decerease!

And yes, the prices will most certainly go up, from pre production to finished product. I could see Burberry going back to showing in Paris, Stella never left so she will continue, McQueen will be back in Paris for sure! LFW will feel the impact the most, it always struggled, but now even more so than ever! Some models might not be able to walk in the shows, when all is said and done!

Like i said, unless the new resolutions are reached that make things easier. ***Edited ***
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From WWW:
LONDON – Fashion industry figures across Europe expressed their dismay at the U.K.’s shock decision to exit the European Union as market losses widened and the pound fell to its lowest level against the euro in three decades.

Britain’s pro-Europe Prime Minister David Cameron has revealed plans to step down in October, arguing that he is clearly not the man to finesse the raft of new trade deals that will be required with the EU, while Bank of England governor Mark Carney has assured the country there are contingency plans in place to keep the economy humming and financial markets moving.

British designers, universities and related institutions were very much in favor of the country remaining in the EU, arguing the freedom of trade and flow of citizens was a boon for business – and creativity.

Many in the industry throughout Europe immediately took to social media to express their disappointment in the result, which saw a record turnout of 72.2 percent, with 52 percent voting in favor of Leave and 48 for Remain. Analysts also warned that the result could impact luxury goods and fashion firms that do business in Europe, given the drop in the value of the pound against the euro and dollar.

“A dark day indeed,” wrote Christopher Raeburn, who took his bow during London Collections: Men earlier this month in a T-shirt that trumpeted his pro-Europe stance. “Heading to Paris for SS17 sales, to continue to meet and work with our European friends and to work out how this will impact in the longer term.”

Sibling’s Cozette McCreery, who took her bow at the men’s collections with co-designer Sid Bryan wearing an IN T-shirt, wrote: ‘I’ve never been more disappointed in my own country. A divided country. An idiot Prime Minister. A fool waiting in the wings.”

Adrian Joffe, chief executive officer of Comme des Garcons and Dover Street Market, told WWD: “F–k democracy, we’re back in the Middle Ages. For me, it’s a step backwards, it’s not the modern world. The modern world is about being together and working together. I’m devastated. I want freedom of people, freedom of movement. For me it’s anti-creative thinking.”

Speaking at his spring 2017 men’s presentation for the Spanish brand Loewe, Northern Ireland native Jonathan Anderson expressed sympathy for the young people U.K., many of whom voted to Remain in the EU. “Their voice will now not be heard,” he said.

“I think it’s very, very disgusting, this situation,” Anderson said. “We’re really just voting here about immigration. To be honest, we should never have voted on this in the beginning.”

He said he was puzzled about Brexit’s potential impact on his eponymous London-based business. “I have no idea,” he said. “It’s very worrying to be at this moment…I really hope American looks to a situation like this and takes note. This is the world we live in. It’s that radicalized.”

“Beyond the economic impact, there’s a political and cultural aspect,” said Pascal Morand, executive president of the Fédération Française de la Couture, du Prêt-à-Porter des Couturiers et des Créateurs de Mode – French fashion’s governing body. “It’s an inward-looking instinct. Fashion is at the opposite of anything inward-looking. Fashion is about open-mindedness and fashion is at the forefront of modernity, internationally, digitally and esthetically,” he said before adding: “We have to be even more tight-knit than before and move forward. It’s a question of values.”

“It’s a very bad news,” said François-Marie Grau, managing director of the French Women’s Ready-to-Wear Federation. “The U.K. is our fifth client in terms of clothing exports. French apparel exports to the U.K. were up 16 percent to 750 million euros [or $832 million at average exchange] in 2015.

“We see two impacts in the short term, plus one big uncertainty: firstly a monetary effect with the plunge of the British pound that will make our collections more expensive. Secondly, we’re bracing for a challenging export market with a decrease of consumption in the U.K. Then, the U.K. has two years to negotiate the free-trade agreement. If there’s a customs union, it won’t change anything. But if customs tariffs are being restored, that will make our collections even more expansive. Typically, the U.K. has a 12 percent customs tariffs for countries outside the E.U.”

Early this morning, French designer Anne-Valérie Hash posted a photo of European country flags accompanied by the hashtag #Whatasadday, while Felipe Oliveira Baptista posted a photo of David Cameron with a caption that read: “You’re history #DavidCameron.”

Caroline de Maigret put online a quote from Nelson Mandela – “May your choices reflect your hopes, not your fears” – on a black background with a broken heart emoticon as a caption. Diane Kruger and Yaz Bukey were among those posting a map of Europe with scissors cutting the lines linking the U.K. to the European Continent. Meanwhile, public relations executive Lucien Pagès posted a photo of a dark tunnel with the hashtags #eurotunnel #intothedarkness.

Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo reacted on Twitter, writing, “I just heard the grave news about the the U.K. referendum. It’s a sad day for Europe and all European cities. I want to pay tribute to my friend @SadiqKhan [the new mayor of London] who fought with courage to remain in the E.U. Friendship between our two cities will remain powerful.”

“I feel strongly about building bridges between Paris and London, favoring solidarity and exchanges, instead of creating competition.”

The fashion photographer and media entrepreneur Nick Knight of Show Studio wrote: “Xenophobia, ignorance, stupidity and fear are now the forces driving this country. The politicians both left and right have totally let us down.

“This completely unnecessary referendum was called for self-servicing political reasons by Cameron who has now fled, leaving the country in the hands of nationalistic bigots and fools. I am ashamed, disgusted, heartbroken and very angry.”

The British Fashion Council took a measured stance, as did University of the Arts London, UAL.

While BFC chief executive Caroline Rush said there will “no doubt be upset and dismay at today’s result” the organization has a role to play in keeping government abreast of the industry’s priorities “and keeping the designer community updated on any likely impact to business as our country prepares to leave the EU over the coming years.”

Although the BFC never took a stand on Brexit, it released a survey earlier this month showing overwhelming support for the Remain campaign. As reported, the fashion industry sees itself firmly as part of a great international community and relishes London as a capital of finance, tech, creativity and innovation. It also views the country as a beacon of generosity, open-mindedness and progressiveness — all arguments Cameron has been making for reasons to stay.

Earlier this year, 198 business leaders — including Burberry’s chief creative and chief executive officer, Christopher Bailey; Kurt Geiger chairman Neil Clifford, and Jacqueline Gold, head of the high-street lingerie chain Ann Summers — signed a letter stating they wanted to remain part of Europe.

Last month, more than 280 British creatives signed another letter voicing their support for the Remain camp. They included designers Vivienne Westwood, Patrick Grant, Bella Freud, Katharine Hamnett, Hussein Chalayan and Daniel Fletcher. British Vogue editor Alexandra Shulman has also been vocal in her support of Britain staying put.

Fashion designers and creatives immediately took to social media Friday to voice their discontent with the referendum result.

Westwood posted a Sex Pistols’ “No Future” sign.

Sibling posted a “No Comment” picture, accompanied by the words: “#SIBLING ARE #EUROPEAN #SIBLINGsquad IS STRONG THROUGH UNITY & WILL CONTINUE TO BE #PEACE #LOVE #ACCEPTANCE #HOPE WE WILL NOT BE DEFINED THROUGH THE ACTS OF OTHERS #SIBLINGsquad #NOtotheReferendum #REJECT #REVOLT.”

Not only the Brits are commenting the outcome – Italia Independent’s Lapo Elkann wrote: “Given that I’m an ardent defender of democracy in all its forms and thus respecting the freedom of expressing a vote, I am astonished for what’s happened in Great Britain. I’ve always been a supporter of Union and not of divisions. While staying united we can stimulate growth and progress, not the other way around. As an European citizen and entrepreneur I can only fear the consequences of Brexit that are already afflicting Europe and the planet’s economy and history.”

Katie Grand wrote: “I’ve never been so unproud to be British,” while the official Instagram account of LOVE magazine asked ironically “Trump next?”

Blogger Susie Bubble posted a picture of a puzzled U.K. flag, writing: “A broken and fractured puzzle of pieces that may not ever come together again. This is not the country I know and love. Let the chips fall where they may, but I’m doubtful it will be a place I want to stay in or have my children grow up in.”

Other brands expressing their concern via social media included Alexander Lewis, Erdem, Roksanda, Shrimps, Fausto Puglisi and Nicholas Kirkwood.

Bella Freud posted a picture of the now famous Bristol street-art kiss between Donald Trump and Boris Johnson: “Woke up to this. RIP Europe. ”

Daniel Fletcher posted a black picture and wrote “Devastated.”

Raeburn posted a picture of the famed statue of Winston Churchill in Parliament Square with Big Ben in the background and wrote: “A dark day indeed. Image credit unknown (sorry). Heading to Paris for SS17 sales, to continue to meet and work with our European friends and to work out how this will impact in the longer term. #Brexit”

Kinvara Balfour tried to find the silver lining: “This is Great Britain. We have always been great. Though no longer part of the EU, we are still a part of Europe & we are a part of THE WORLD. Let’s honour that, take responsibility for that, work for that & be proud of our own powerful nation. Courage & focus are needed but this is a new chapter, not the end ”

Muzungu Sisters’ Dana Alikhani and Tatiana Santo Domingo wrote: “Mate, what have you done? hearbreaking and scary. Shocked this is happening. A victory for fear mongering and xenophobia. London is so out of touch with the rest of this country. Pound hits lowest level since 1985 #brexit #June23.”

Toby Bateman of Mr Porter posted a screenshot from Ben Riley-Smith’s Twitter profile, where he posted the breakdown of how ages voted, and commented, “Now the next generation has to live with the decision of the past generation. Lost for words.”

According to the results, 75 percent of Britons aged 18-24 voted to remain, while only 39 percent of people ages 65 and over did.

The London college UAL said it remains committed to all of its students, regardless of nationality. It stressed that any EU students who are already studying at the university, which includes London College of Fashion, and for those starting at UAL in 2016, all fees will be held “at the same amount as is paid by U.K. students.”

EU students currently pay the same as British students at universities in the U.K., while non-EU ones often pay about double.

“Leaving the EU will undoubtedly have an impact on UAL in the longer-term. We are working on our plans for the transition period and beyond. All of our plans will reflect our ongoing commitment to European collaboration and to our student body,” it said.

Companies that do business in the U.K. and abroad also weighed in, with a L’Oréal spokeswoman saying the company’s primary commitment is to its employees and stakeholders.

“We remain focused on best serving our consumers in the U.K.,” she said.

Rubin Ritter, member of the board of German e-commerce giant Zalando, said the company believes in the advantages that result from a single European market, but also respects the U.K.’s decision.

“Of course we will adapt our processes concerning the U.K. market in order to remain compliant. We also have experiences with markets outside of the EU, and are positive that we would be able to find a good solution and establish smooth processes for the U.K. and its Zalando customers.”

A spokeswoman for German beauty giant Beirsdorf said, “We have followed the United Kingdom’s referendum to stay in the European Union and, of course, we have prepared for the various scenarios beforehand. After the vote for the United Kingdom to leave the EU we now await further decisions and will adapt to the possible new conditions. The United Kingdom is and remains a very important market for Beiersdorf. Please understand that Beiersdorf does not wish to make any statements on political topics.”

Thomas Rasch, managing director of German Fashion, the Cologne-based association of fashion producers, noted that for German men’s wear makers in particular, the U.K. is one of the most important export markets.

“A weaker British pound will immediately have an effect,” he said. Moreover, Britain’s exit from the EU means “the movement of goods will become more cumbersome and bureaucratic again. But it will affect the British themselves even more strongly,” he suggested.

“The EU has negotiated preferential agreements with many sourcing countries that will no longer apply to them. They will surely regret this gut decision.”

Norbert Lock, managing director, wholesale and retail for the German women’s wear label Marc Cain, said the company will have to accept the decision and move on: “We regret for our British customers that it came to ‘leave.’ I know that through their importer status they were against the Brexit, and now they have to cope with a weaker pound. We’ll behave as we have by other currency crises in Russia, Switzerland and other countries. We’ll support our clients and overcome the crisis together.”

He added that Marc Cain had “consciously pushed back several store projects until now, and we will examine the pros and cons, rents and costs, buying power and possible price changes. Today the U.K. decided, and we’ll consider the possible disadvantages and reactions quietly and calmly. But what remains valid is: Yes – for the client.”
wwd
 
Last edited by a moderator:
continued...
By midday CET on Friday, Europe’s major markets continued their downward trajectory, with Milan’s FTSE MIB leading the downslide. The Italian market plummeted 10 percent to 16,159.09, followed by the CAC 40 in Paris, 7.9 percent to 4,110.48 and the DAX in Frankfurt, 6.6 percent to 9,578.06. The FTSE 100 in London fell 5 percent to 6021.84.

The pound recovered some ground, edging up to 1.25 euros from 1.22 euros earlier in the day, and to $1.39 up from $1.34.

Carney, the Bank of England governor, said on BBC earlier today that contingency plans are in place and that markets – and Britons themselves – should not panic. The bank had warned prior to the vote that leaving the EU could have significant negative impact on the economy, including tipping it into a “technical recession.”

“The bank has put in place extensive contingency plans and these plans begin with ensuring that the core of our financial system is well capitalized, is liquid and is strong,” he said in a TV speech shortly after Cameron’s resignation.

“This resilience is backed up by the Bank of England’s liquidity facilities in sterling and foreign currencies and all of these resources will support orderly market functioning in the face of any short-term volatility. The bank will continue to consult and cooperate with all relevant domestic and international authorities to ensure that the U.K. financial system can absorb any stresses and can do its job of concentrating on serving the real economy.

“We’ve taken all the necessary steps to prepare for today’s events and in the future we will not hesitate to take any additional measure required to meet our responsibility as United Kingdom moves forward.”

Banks said retail and luxury companies will be impacted by Britain’s exit based on how and where they trade and source.

Thomas Chauvet of Citi wrote that while movements in foreign exchange will impact luxury earnings and share prices, the bank believes that investors are focusing on the sector’s weak fundamentals and underlying revenue and earnings performance.

“Most EUR-listed companies have a relatively small exposure to the U.K., and the 4 percent appreciation of EUR/GBP today is likely to have minimal impact on EUR-denominated earnings. More importantly, the fall in EUR/USD would theoretically support gross margins and earnings per share upgrades at EUR-denominated companies and drive a gradual recovery in tourist-related demand in Continental Europe, which have significantly slowed since tragic terrorist events in Europe.”

Gian Luca Pacini, equity analyst branded goods at Intesa SanPaolo said, “The companies in the branded goods sector that Intesa follows, excluding the relevant part of Yoox Net-a-porter’s e-commerce business, have limited revenues and costs in pounds as they are diversified at a global level. Clearly, Brexit will have a temporary negative effect on stock prices.”

Moody’s said in a report Friday that it expects, over time, that the U.K. and Europe will come to an arrangement to preserve most – but probably not all – of the current trading relationships.

However, it also pointed to “clear downside risks.” It said substantial new tariff or non-tariff barriers to trading goods and services would have an adverse impact on U.K. sectors that trade extensively with the European Union market, such as automotives, manufacturing and food production.

It added the lasting credit effects of Brexit will depend on a new U.K.-EU trade model.

The referendum result reverses Britain’s 41-year history in the EU and plunges the country into new waters: Cameron will resign within three months, and said it will be up to a new Conservative prime minister to negotiate new trade deals with the EU, and trigger Article 50, the law that outlines EU withdrawal procedures.

Although no exit polls were conducted, previous opinion polls had indicated that the Remain camp was ahead by a small margin. According to a poll by YouGov, which asked 5,000 Britons how they voted on Thursday, 52 percent said they voted to remain part of the E.U., while 48 percent voted to leave.
wwd

**** Edited *** ... just like KissMiss said. British fashion will suffer for sure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
*** Edited ***
I feel like this will have a negative effect on UK fashion. I wouldn't be surprised if the major brands start showing somewhere else. But apparently the leave is a 2 year process so we'll see
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you Nymphaea for posting.

*** Edited ***

It will have an impact on British Fashion, mainly because it's a very "young designers" oriented industry compare to France and Italy.
In the worst scenario, it will make UK fashion less attractive and force key players to show abroad.
But i hope that they will have the support from the remaining countries. We don't need and we don't want UK to be isolated from the rest of the continent.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And don't forget about the models. Agencies will have to figure things out as the girls will surely need a VISA and many girls that would only work in the EU due to it will most surely loose a big market. I believe that, on one side, Paris and Milan will benefit from this and get major contracts with British fashion houses but it will also collapse the modelling market as many models will face unnecessary logistical problems. Many Brazilian models, for example, will have to choose between the Paris/Milan and London as they can only afford one VISA and I think I know which one they will choose.
 
I don't think the short-terms effects will be that drastic.. I mean, if anything, considering the way the pound looks right now, it should make things more accessible for a while..

Also plenty of Russian models walking just fine in London catwalks.. I don't think the requirements will suddenly be harder for EU citizens? I don't know (really, I don't.. :lol::ninja:).

The major effects will be in the long run, in 10-20 years time.. I think fashion education might resent that, but I don't think there's necessarily going to be a shortage, but the flow of EU students will now be on a par with those from Asia or the US (or anywhere else really), meaning that right now it is very hard and expensive to study in the UK and let's say that if you're American, you either need to get a good scholarship or come from a very stable background in order to afford that.. I'm speaking half in ignorance here but I think you could be from a relatively average/middle class background in France or Germany and relocate to the UK without gigantic sacrifices. Of course this group of people will find it harder now and will definitely think twice on seeking education and things like internships or part-time jobs to start a fashion career in the UK.. I guess other cities with a decent fashion industry but not that relevant like Berlin or Stockholm might be favored in this?. Who knows..

I'm optimistic and I mentioned in that 'is fashion less interesting?' thread that all these xenophobic directions in different countries might actually impact fashion positively, considering fashion is a dead fish right now.. english fashion in particular can be so ridiculously creative and outspoken that they always manage to find routes in adversity to create thoughtful things and transform the whole industry... of course it is sad that it takes this, and it even takes lives, for society to stop and think about what went wrong and figure out what how to clean the mess, but frankly, and this isn't exclusive to the UK.. the inequality of education, living conditions, information sources, poor integration strategies, sensibility towards the background and ideas of a neglected sector no matter how stupid and bigoted it is.. that inequality and the many years that go by piling over without even being acknowledged as a problem that requires strong action.. it always comes back with a check and sometimes the price is so high, like in this case.

What's amazing is that when there is presence by organizations and the government and educational institutions to prevent people in suburbs, industrial, working-class/highly vulnerable areas to be toyed by opportunistic political [strike]rats[/strike] interests and they offer opportunities to participate and start projects that are inclusive to experience things like art and fashion, and are basically just engaged and recognised by the capital, that's usually where really interesting things come from.. they rarely come from the city. It would be nice if fashion looked in that direction... or if, instead of hoping for the battle of the richest in UK education seats, they'd create more programs to inspire and integrate those in vulnerable situation.

kind of singing kumbaya, I know.. hugs to all UK members :ninja: :heart:..
 
i saw a few people saying, half jokingly but also seriously, "time to peruse UK shops and designers online, what with the pound dropping drastically!" - so maybe there'll actually be a rise in sales? ^_^

hope it all works out for the best.
 
Kudos to my dearest Nick Knight, perhaps the only quote in that piece which struck a chord in me.
A lot of Anlabe's questions simply cannot be answered just yet. But I think we shouldn't forget that the UK is still a thriving and profitable fashion market, second or third only to the US and China perhaps. It will not turn overnight into this barren landscape, with zero prospects. Spending power is still immense, and it would be foolish for anyone with levelheaded business acumen to close up shop regardless of the logistical implications. It's far too soon for this.

Yes, I predict LFW will be even less prestigious now. And yet on the other hand, is it wise or even plausible for Vogue Germany not to send an editor off to cover LFW? What will it say about them? One cannot make marketing decisions with an emotional mindset.

I also cannot see why the likes of M&M would uproot themselves. They'd still need to maintain a base in London, surely? I do think now, more than ever, fashion and politics will not only collide, but will manifest perhaps in the most interesting ways (bet you're gloating, Mulletproof! :wink:. Indies such as ID, Pop, perhaps even Love, might get interesting, because the type of material will certainly resonate with some.

Sarah Burton designed the wedding dress of Duchess Kate. So I highly doubt McQueen would migrate to Paris. Same for Westwood. The latter would instead use LFW as a protesting platform, I'm sure.

Ultimately, while I don't think this type of angst and impending austerity is any good for the man on the street, but it might actually do wonders for creatives. So I agree with Mulletproof in a way. I thought it was a disgusting thing to say, but then I remembered Balenciaga and a host of others produced the most provocative collections in an era of appalling wretchedness (the Iraqi/Afghanistan war).
 
Sorry for the jumbled post, just removed the overt political parts and posted.

On a lighter note, since we are on such a divorcing high, can we now push for our own edition Vanity Fair??????
 
So I agree with Mulletproof in a way. I thought it was a disgusting thing to say
:rofl: :rofl:..

I was trying to be optimistic!

But yeah 2003 will go down as one of my favorite years in fashion haha, everyone was so angry about the invasion and a lot of the imagery produced then reflects that.

weren't you against the remain campaigners or just not feeling wolfgang tillmans? are you a.. regrexiter? lol
 
:rofl: :rofl:..

I was trying to be optimistic!

But yeah 2003 will go down as one of my favorite years in fashion haha, everyone was so angry about the invasion and a lot of the imagery produced then reflects that.

weren't you against the remain campaigners or just not feeling wolfgang tillmans? are you a.. regrexiter? lol

Golly, thanks for the proverbial scarlet letter you've just painted on my chest! And in Caps! Lol.

I'm against the employ of art as a tool for political means. As a result I almost always regard the pairing of art and politics with the utmost suspicion. There's a huge difference between making a statement and coercion, imo. The moment you cannot tell said difference it becomes a bit shaky. Tillmans on the other hand steamed ahead and blatantly courted, which I thought was a bit unfair. Little did I know clutching my pearls would be of no consequence.
 
Well you can look at it as coercion, but it can also be creating awareness and filling up the void of a weakened education system and media outlets... I think art could do more in terms of social commentary, be less selfish, more responsible and involved, and inclusive too, same for entertainment... I find it sad that we live in a world where some people act as if they could abstain from any social responsibility, especially a huge one such as the economic and political direction of a country... they are fine using a huge public platform to tell us personal things like how our relationships should be, how our butt and hair should look, strange ways to advance in life and be successful, what they don't like about pop culture, but god forbid they come to terms with their presence as public citizens and use that same outlet for the sacred things I just mentioned for something so low and dirty and uncalled for such as options for the economic system and its effects. :meow::lol:

I don't think any of these fields help that much anyway lol.. when you look at these maps and where fear is more prevalent, it's clear you actually have to detach from any notion of urban privilege (social media included) and go 1930s style, door by door, breaking s*it down.. but by the time you try, it's usually too late..
 
I’ll have to remind myself to bite my tongue since the political and social ramifications of only a less-than-52%-win is sure to rile up some discontent in the aftermath is something that’s not welcomed in this discussion…

But on a purely creative, high fashion aspect— I agree with Mullet that such a political development will surely be the motivation for creative inspirations for a new wave of designers … There’s is so much complexity, richness and history to British fashion, and the best of their architects are always such interesting provocateurs to boot. And to be frank, the current offering is hardly living up to its predecessors of the likes of Viv, Galliano and McQueen— all of whom had always been political at some time, in their fashion presentations— and I always think British high fashion is at its best when it has a political message. Maybe this historical development will be the catalyst for the new guard of visionaries. It’s such a shame that it may take an independent Britain to instigate a new wave in high fashion to excite us fashion addicts— something that I would conclude is not even in the periphery of the average English citizen right now.
 
What does it matter. I think its time the Europeans got over the fact they are no longer the center of the world re: fashion. Asian markets and indeed the American (North and South), with the growing Middle East, Sub Continent and Pacific markets are so much more worthy of Britain's interests now more than ever as far as fashion is concerned. Even here in tiny little Australia we have conceded that Asia is far more important to us than Europe.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
210,721
Messages
15,125,037
Members
84,419
Latest member
paulpaul
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->