How true.
I've tried my hardest to stay away from this thread. So hard, but I couldn't resist any longer. I honestly, was never interested in the company, and was younger I was one of those kids who was totally against it. I'm from Columbus, and the suburbs are the test grounds for the company, so everyone I knew was heavily influenced by that lifestyle while growing up. However, years and years later, I'm now a manager. For me, its not jeans a t-shirts, for me its a career. Do I think the clothes are great? Not all the time. Do I wholeheartedly believe in the lifestyle? Not all the time. But I believe strongly in running my business. I believe in the opportunities that this company has for aspirational young individuals.
Clothings brands, are just that, they're brands that work harder that I think most of you realize in branding their image. Just because the A&F isn't exactly the first choice of the vast majority of TFS posters (myself included) doesn't mean that it should be treated poorly. There's a certain type of person who epitomizes the Marc Jacobs aesthetic, some people who are sexy enough Versace, and there are some people who embrace the "casual luxury" and all-American aesthetic of A&F. Just because someone chooses one brand to buy into, does not make them better or worse than anyone else.
Now granted, there are some people that are at extremes and reject everything that doesn't coincide with their preppy aesthetic. But is that any different than someone who is extremely concerned with only high-fashion, rejecting any other aesthetic? Both are equally limited and arrogant.
Just my two cents...