Balenciaga F/W 06.07 Paris | Page 7 | the Fashion Spot

Balenciaga F/W 06.07 Paris

Caffeine said:
I just called the boutique in NYC. the trunk show will be March 20 and 21st. you can ask for invitation.
spring items will start arriving in mid March :D

Awesome. Thanks for the info Caffeine :flower:

Like most, I was disappointed in this collection based on the first posts but after seeing more I'm starting to like several of the pieces like these (posted earlier) as well as the dress on Natasha Poly.

32.jpg
38.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
*EllaH said:
Thank you for putting it so well, last season was definately too much for me, this collection is much more my cup of tea. It's a collection very true to it's label, also very different from Ghesquiere's last few collection. The detailing here is beautiful, yet not too overwhelming.

You're most welcome.:flower: I'm glad to hear from someone who shared the same feelings about the last season's collection, I felt like a contrarian when everyone was gushing over what seemed to me dated and too facile interpretation of "luxury" and like the reviewer said, "mega haut bourgeois."

As for the critic, personally, I don't know what the reviwer means when he says the silhouette is too extreme as I'm already wearing this egg shape this winter, not as beautifully executed as these, of course, but versions of it you can find in smaller, edgier, *cheaper* boutiques. Why wouldn't clothes that make you look Twiggy skinny (and are comfortable to wear) catch on like wild fire? The complaint that plump women would look bulbous is also moot, last season's gothic lolita rococco frills and huge baroque skirts would be even more ridiculous on big women, and silly on almost every female over age 15.

The plaid now, look carefully at the way the window-pane check pieces are executed into curve shapes with a fetish to precision, that's luxury. You can tuck a lot of things behind frills, but there's nowhere to hide when every shape, edge, seam has to be skillfully constructed to be symmetrical and proportional. To me, plaid is as classic as houndstooth or stripes, and is very difficult to work with in tailored clothes (I'm not talking about grunge shirts) as they are graphically unforgiving, unlike say, prints. Any small mistake and it would look off.

I do agree with the criticisms that the collection is too retro and archival, but then so are edwardian/baroque refernces. For a while now, I have this insane urge to dress like one of the absurd women in the French 60s New Wave films, Bridgitte Bardot in Contempt, Delphine Seyrig in Last Year in Marienbad, Anna Karina, etc. because of recent re-releases from Criterion of a lot of 60s classics. Well, for men, Jean-Paul Belmondo has been making an appearance in all those skinny suits and pork-pie hats...There is something right in the zeigeist of that period for today's aesthetics, a stirring against an ultra-conservative mainstream that was embodied in the 50s ideal, small high waists, big poufy skirt, "lady" to the max. In that regard, this is as Parisian as it gets.

I like this direction as an alternative to the deconstructed layers that have been the contemporary foil for the period frills.

A lot of flaws, but such a desirable collection.:)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Im...not...feeling...it. Im extremely disappointed. I was expecting a incredible show full of fresh, wearable clothes. The shoes are kinda...p*rno, not in the cool Queen Mum way in the D&G way.
 
If I was a girl and didnt wear a size 15 mens, I would squeeze into those shoes and strut! :lol:
 
The_Ida said:
This collection is SO Cristobal. I absolutely love the shapes, the jackets, the babydoll-tops :flower:
Agree! Reference to the archive, & rather retro (but I don't like the look).
IMHO, its' not comparable to the last seaon, or even the season before the last.
 
JJohnson said:
I loved the heavy volume to this collection and BTW Mutterlein are you in fashion? U seem to know a lot! :heart:

I'm a nerd. I'd like to work in fashion, it's my eventual goal.
 
I love platform shoes, but these are a bit too much for me..

I'm thinking they''' tone the ones that actually no one sale down a bit. I can't imagine these selling very well. Although I do usually like balenciagas shoes, they're not so dainty and strappy and usually a bit 'different'

00020m.jpg

00040m.jpg

00060m.jpg

00140m.jpg

00220m.jpg

00330m.jpg

style.com
 
Pastry said:
meh, sarah mower also manages to drop a sweet line about dolce& gabbana as well as dior, soo...:innocent:

Yeah, she is very predictable - liking the most renowned designers and disliking others. However, it's clear that Cathy Horyn also loves this collection. As I knew she would. This collection with its early 60s references is a real reviewer crowd pleaser, it really is, that was an era which is pretty much the eptiome of elegance and refinement. Most of the reviewers collectively squirm at references which are made to styles later than the mid 70s.

Anyway, check out Cathy Horyn's review at nyt:

"Balenciaga Transports Modern to a New Century"
 
What a drastic change from last season, definitely less romantic but tightly focused...though the cuts r insanely retro, the collection look inexplicably fresh as a whole...Bravo to Nicolas i absolutely adore this:heart: :heart: The shoes r slightly questionable but the hats r beautiful
Some of my fav looks ( plus the beautiful dresses)
18.jpg
18d.jpg

23d.jpg
26d.jpg

29.jpg
29d.jpg

36d.jpg
16.jpg

balenciaga.com
 
For me this collection was hit or miss, I'd say half I liked and half I hated. While a lot of it was very Cristobal, a lot of those oversized, architectural, pieces just feel stiff and kind of done. Fashion has exhausted the whole old-world couture volume thing, let's get back to something a bit more real.
 
so beautiful my fave of the season. I much prefer this to SS- so balenciaga! I'm such a cristobal fan so i may be biased
 
normally i wouldn't like platforms like that either but i think they fit here. i love the dresses & the trousers are great! not a fan of the tops though.. and the first set of shots seems like there was nothing to them.
 
I'm totally with you Zazie. I think this collection surpasses the spring collection which I found to be a very 'easy' collection. S/S just sort of was a continuation of what Nicolas has been doing for the past season or so, only completely embellished. This has elements of s/s which provides a nice flow but it's a lot fresher, seems to me would be a lot more work to create (not manually but imaginatively) and at the same time is very true to the house. I think it's a very well executed collection
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,332
Messages
15,297,297
Members
89,291
Latest member
dobjue21
Back
Top