Bitten by Sarah Jessica Parker

i went back to the store in nyc last night to get my sisters some clothes and saw a ton of the 'fashion is not a luxury' t-shirts out in almost all sizes except small. also, there is a variation in a white t-shirt with purple lettering of the slogan. i know there were some people who really wanted that, so i thought i'd let you know...
 
I bought the grey hoodie. It fits great.

I also bought the bootcut jeans... they are the perfect length!! I've been looking for jeans that dont touch the floor when I wear flip flops... and for 14.98, you can't beat it really.

Obviously the clothing line is basic... but the fit and quality are fantastic.
 
^ i concur on the grey hoodie, it fits really well and is of really good quality. also, i got a pair of the boyfriend jeans and really like them a lot. just a nice, relaxed, almost wide-legged jean...not bad for $15 at all!

i think this is a nice basics/casualwear line. i went today to take a closer look at the jewelry for a story i'm working on, and the place is still crazy-crowded with people. i wonder if it is doing well overall...certainly in new york city people seem to be really into it, judging from the crowds.
 
I checked out the jewelry the other day, and so far, that is the only part of her line that I really found to be cheapo looking.
 
wow, her idea is great~fashion for more more normal people~and fashione is a small part of their ordinary life~so make it affortable and easy chic...
 
looks like alot of stuff is showing up on ebay. the prices are hiked up, but i guess it gives people that don't live near an S&B a chance to purchase. kinda defeats SJP's purpose.
 
looks like alot of stuff is showing up on ebay. the prices are hiked up, but i guess it gives people that don't live near an S&B a chance to purchase. kinda defeats SJP's purpose.

This is true. Plus, these are of good quality for their price point, but I wouldn't pay any more for them. They aren't worth it. I must say thought that I have been getting lots of compliments on my boobs since buying the tees in like every color. For a girl with very small boobs, this is a miracle! Hmmm....maybe I would pay anything for this stuff then. Still cheaper than a boob job! :lol:
 
via Cathy Horyn's blog in the NYTimes.

On Monday, I met up with Sarah Jessica Parker at Steve & Barry’s in Herald Square, where she recently brought out her clothing label Bitten. It was around 1 p.m., and the line for the checkout was very long, as it has been since the first day. We stood near the back of the store and gradually we were surrounded by a lot of shoppers, cell-phone cameras raised in that weird salute, and occasionally people interrupted to ask Parker when the sailor pants were due to arrive (in about two weeks) or just to say they liked the clothes. Parker had on a pair of Bitten ankle-zip jeans and a green T-shirt. We were joined by Andy Todd, the president of the company, and Howard Schacter, its chief partnership officer. Steve & Barry’s is a private company, so it doesn’t release sales figures, but Todd said, “We blew away our projections. It’s been beyond ridiculous.” A number of blogs have expressed disappointment with the label and the idea. One said it’s the sort of thing that Carrie Bradshaw and her “Sex and the City” friends would have mocked. My own feelings about the label are that the basics are solid, especially the jeans and the striped T-shirts and cropped hoodies, but that it needed more surprise. That may come with time.


SJP: What was most satisfying to me on the opening day was to see the preponderance of plus-size women and women of color. That’s what made me cry, and I’m not being treacle-y about it. People may have been disdainful about our clothes—well, it’s not for them. They have access. They have the financial or the geographical access to clothes. This is simple American sportswear, and we made the decision to size from 0 to 22, from 5 to 11 in shoe sizes.
What resonated for us on the first day is that women really got the point we were trying to make—which is you should have access to well-made, affordable clothes regardless of your size or where you live. It’s not this rarefied thing. Are we trying to do couture and red-carpet, to be Narciso Rodriguez and Nicolas Ghesquiere, for 20 bucks? Absolutely not.
Q: Have you had a lot of offers to do a fashion line?
A: Yes. I started to be asked in a serious way right when “Sex and the City” ended. I was really confounded by the offers, and it felt really fraudulent to consider them—mostly because they were real design jobs for a huge amount of money. It was the kind of money that designers who had been working for years should have the opportunity to receive. So I felt that the only reason for me to take one of these offers was money, and I’ve never made one of those kind of mercenary decisions. It’s not my approach. I can’t stomach it. So I always declined. And then along came Howard and Andy.
I really didn’t know about a Manhattan Mall and a Steve & Barry’s. I was dubious. I literally hired a team of attorneys to do the due diligence. For eight months.
Q: So how did they convince you?
A: Everything they said was effective. For the longest time it was all about my fear. Not about being exploited, but whether we could really do what they were saying. Can we really make quality clothing? Can we be relevant?
Q: And what did you think of the first looks you saw?
A: I didn’t love everything in that room, and I was afraid to be impolite. I didn’t want to offend anyone’s sensibility. I went back and I thought, “We’re going to start with what women need.” Not what they WANT. These are not women who generally have that choice. So let’s give them everything they need. It became a conversation. Now we’re into our fourth collection, summer ’08. I think we have a lot more for fall just in terms of options.
Q: Did you have any concern that maybe we don’t need more stuff clogging the planet. There is H & M and Target, and Topshop wants to open here.
A: Of course. I think I would have felt that if I didn’t understand the Steve and Barry’s customer. There aren’t H & Ms everywhere. And that’s very trendy fashion—it’s not what every woman wants. I don’t feel there is this surplus, in a way. To me, it’s about access.
Q: But what’s the long term? There’s a sense that labels like this have a short life span, like many things nowadays. Get in, get out.
A: The limited amount of branding that I’ve done has been really thought and thought through. Nothing I have done has been “let’s get in, let’s get out.” Not with Coty or L’Oreal, and not with Steve & Barry’s. My fatal flaw is that I have to be involved literally down to splitting the atoms.
Q: But the marketplace may be less durable.
A: I think the market will dictate that. I mean, the Times has been writing about this subject. I noticed that Eric Wilson wrote a piece last week, where the gauntlet was thrown down by a couple of people I really respect.
Q: You’re referring to Vera Wang’s comment that you should wear your own clothes?
A: I was so shocked.
Q: By the animus?
A: Yeah. I have a long history with Vera, and very friendly. I’ve been to her home. I understand the culture of her business has changed radically, not unlike my primary business where everybody and his mother, with little or no training, wants to be in acting. There are real interlopers in my industry, as in Vera’s.
This is not a cat fight—well, I was going to say I would wear her clothes but apparently I’m not allowed to anymore. [Parker laughs] But we’re really not in competition. This isn’t about competing with the work that Vera has done for years. I couldn’t possibly, nor do I want to. This is a very different endeavor.
Q: It touched a nerve.
A: Sure, man.
Q: Of course many designers, including Vera Wang, are now making clothes at mass-market prices. They seem to want it both ways. And some designers could enter this field but choose not to. What if Olivier Theyskens did a label like this, with jeans for $14.98? He’s hip and talented.
A: And [laughing] he has the prettiest hair.
Q: But designers like him won’t touch this market.
A: But why?
Q: Pride, maybe. Sophistication.
A: I also think they just want to drop in for a minute, like the designers did for the Gap. It’s a moment, a quick affair. But with this line, you have to be a little behind the eight ball. I don’t want it to be fashion forward. A lot of women can’t wear what Olivier designs. It takes time for their eye to adapt.
Q: Except to the consumer, it’s a curious kind of limbo these days. For designers as well.
A: I was so afraid in the beginning. I’ve seen all the people do this kind of line. And I was, like, money, money, money, money. [Parker frowns] I’m an actor. That’s really what I do. But I’d wake up at night and say this is a totally defendable move. What can people say to me—“how dare you want to make clothes for women who are size 16?” There’s no argument. Either you like it or you don’t. That’s the beauty of living in America. Or, it’s supposed to be.
We’ve had some criticisms, even before the line was launched. And I say, “Great. Bring it on. And tell me what troubles you about women in this country having affordable, well-made clothes. Let’s talk about it.
 
^ Thanks for that! I had not idea about the Vera Wang comment. Ouch!
 
laika, thanks for posting that. im beginning to dislike this woman and her wares more and more...

i think what SJP thinks is that most americans are too STUPID to wear fashion-forward clothing. ("I don’t want it to be fashion forward. A lot of women can’t wear what Olivier designs. It takes time for their eye to adapt.")

i think she is dead wrong.

and why can't vera wang call a spade a spade?

and i also find it telling that SJP and the steve and barrys people castigates their critics as coming just from the "blogs". this is a common political move that reframes people that dont dig the clothes as "elites" and therefore out of touch with america.
 
I like SJP but a lot of plus-size women and women of color don't absolutely need Bitten the way she seems to think they do. These women are every bit as stylish as other female consumers and willing and able to spend money on higher priced clothing.

I liker the Bitten line but SJP really needs to be careful not to come off so patonizing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
big surprise, looks like bitten is ripping off other brands already.:rolleyes:

a 10$ bitten bag (right) compared to an anna corrina bag that sells for 360$ at shopbop.com (comparison from fashionista.com)

i wonder if the high heel shoes for bitten will have red bottoms on them like louboutin:rolleyes:
 

Attachments

  • br.jpg
    br.jpg
    51.5 KB · Views: 9
^^^ It has nothing to do with intelligence, but most women don't CARE about being fashion forward. My mom is perfectly happy in her clothing, even though I find it hideous. And my entire high school lived in jeans, sweats and flip flops. 99% of them didn't care about being "stylish".

And ripping off other brands is what EVERY low-priced line does. That's half the fun.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
what a stupid name for a line!! and by the looks of it its like something u can buy in any C&A like store
 
lucy92 said:
i wonder if the high heel shoes for bitten will have red bottoms on them like louboutin:rolleyes:

If they did, would it really matter? Louboutin's red sole isn't trademarked; I'm sure there were plenty of other brands who made their soles a "unique" color before he did.
 
Cathy Horyn's latest blog entry
June 22, 2007, 3:20 pm

Of all the topics raised by the Sarah Jessica Parker interview, the one that stirred the most debate was how Steve & Barry’s can deliver Bitten at such low prices, and does this mean the company employs sweat shops and other unethical manufacturing practices. The subject came up during my conversation with SJP at the store — and, according to Parker, she asked similar questions of Steve & Barry’s during her due diligence. But since a lot of people on the blog are concerned about this issue, I decided to explore it further with Howard Schacter, the company’s chief partnership officer, and we spoke this morning.

The issue is really two-fold. There are operational efficiencies that Steve & Barry’s uses to help keep the cost of garments down, and then there is the matter of manufacturing. From the outset, when Steve Shore and Barry Prevor founded the company, in 1985, near the campus of the University of Pennsylvania, their objective was to offer the highest quality for the lowest possible price. How do they do that?

Here’s what Schacter said: “Most brands that we consume as shoppers — the car you drive, the pen in your hand — are priced on a market system. What can the market bear? We price our products on a cost basis and then add a very fair, small profit to it. We’re O.K. making a little bit on a ton of items rather than a big profit margin on a few items.”

In other branches of the fashion world, you have middle men — the wholesaler, the retailer, maybe a licensing guy — and that means you have different people taking a profit on a garment before it reaches the consumer. Steve & Barry’s is the manufacturer, so there is no middle man. That’s one way it can hold down prices.

Schacter also said that it’s part of the company’s culture to be efficient in all channels. “There are roughly 1,000 points in the process — from the cotton seed to putting the garment into a shopping bag — and we’re looking very carefully at all of them. We cut the fat where we can. We’re producing at off peak, often off season, and we’re buying in bulk.”

The kind of marketing and advertising that fashion houses use adds a lot to the cost of a garment. Steve & Barry’s relies on word-of-mouth marketing. Schacter cited a few other cost-saving measures. When executives travel, they don’t stay in swank hotels. “I stay at the Howard Johnson’s at LAX,” Schacter said, with a little laugh. “We don’t have a company jet. I’m talking to you on a $20 chair. I’m not sitting on an $800 chair.” He went on. “We only use trucks that are packed to the brim, so that saves us on fuel. We fold our shirts in a certain way, so there’s not extra labor involved. And at the checkout we don’t ask customers for their email addresses. You get out of the store quicker and it cuts down on labor time.”

As NL on the blog suggested, if we’re surprised to find clothes at decent prices, maybe we’ve grown used to paying for overpriced goods.

Now to the manufacturing part, I asked Schacter if it follows that a $14.95 pair of jeans means that it was made in a sweatshop. “Absolutely not,” he said. Steve & Barry’s produces clothes in 20 to 30 countries around the world. “We have a very strict foreign sourcing policy when it comes to legal and ethical business practices,” he said. “We have people around the world who are diligent about determining who we’re going to conduct business with, and then monitoring them as closely as we can.” One labor rights group, cited on the blog, noted that Steve & Barry’s took aggressive action in 2005 with a Kenyan factory that had subcontracted work to a sweatshop.
Although it isn’t my intent to satisfy everyone on the blog, or to offer a thorough review of the company, I think it’s always good to have a little more information. You can then make up your own mind.

source: nytimes.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
^ That's a great article (or blog entry, whatever you wish to call it). I haven't had a chance to actually visit a Steve & Barry's and look at the collection myself, but now I'm quite anxious to. Thanks for posting!
 
Yeah, because high-end brands would NEVER use sweat shop made materials. I saw some expose on sweat shop labor and one high-end brand and one discount brand used the same lace manufactured in an Indian sweatshop.
 
You know I actually saw this line the other day and was pretty impressed. For the price it is pretty decent. Most of it looks like Gap clothing (she even ripped off GapBody bras for only $10!). Frankly, I think it is fantastic for shoppers who can't afford anything pricier.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,697
Messages
15,196,576
Members
86,681
Latest member
yoona
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->