No, it is just stuck in time. i will always prefer Tomas Maier's sophisticated Bottega.And you will get even sicker of it, because it still is ahead of its time and there will be still much more of it, you can't even imagine.
No, it is just stuck in time. i will always prefer Tomas Maier's sophisticated Bottega.And you will get even sicker of it, because it still is ahead of its time and there will be still much more of it, you can't even imagine.
Well it's all about our taste. Minimalism wise, i would rather see Helmut aesthetic in BottegaAnd you will get even sicker of it, because it still is ahead of its time and there will be still much more of it, you can't even imagine.
Yeah, Tomas Maier is so revolutionary that his Bottega is the one everyone copies nowadays. I did moderately liked his brand some years ago, but mostly it was bland at best.No, it is just stuck in time. i will always prefer Tomas Maier's sophisticated Bottega.
Helmut is an amazing aesthetic, but it's not Bottega. It's wayy too sexy and subversive for such a refined brand. New bottega has hit the nail on the head, it's the perfect mixture of elegance and feminine defined sexiness.Well it's all about our taste. Minimalism wise, i would rather see Helmut aesthetic in Bottega
Moving anything in general is always so fun! this one? if it stays still it's horrendous but in motion? gi-ve-me!I always love his “moving” dresses
Executing dresses impossible to emulate is a sign of success, in my opinion. Who gets satisfaction out of being easily cloned by Zara ?Yeah, Tomas Maier is so revolutionary that his Bottega is the one everyone copies nowadays. I did moderately liked his brand some years ago, but mostly it was bland at best.
I feel like that isn't a good excuse. You can learn from someone and use the knowledge you've gained from them while making your work distinctly your own (i.e. Warhol/Basquiat, Klimt/Schiele). But I think the aesthetic of the brand has more to do with the direction from those above Blazy anyways. He's a fantastic designer who's proven himself to be able to design through the lenses of different styles. It's just been years upon years of this Phoebe stuff from brands all over. I don't expect radical things from Bottega but I just wish to see a little shakeup one day.Seriously? What else do you expect? They (he and Lee) both worked for old Céline
Executing dresses impossible to emulate is a sign of success, in my opinion. Who gets satisfaction out of being easily cloned by Zara ?
It's not my fault it's not my fault^ Phoebe stans coming for your hair in 4...3....2...
I feel like that isn't a good excuse. You can learn from someone and use the knowledge you've gained from them while making your work distinctly your own (i.e. Warhol/Basquiat, Klimt/Schiele). But I think the aesthetic of the brand has more to do with the direction from those above Blazy anyways. He's a fantastic designer who's proven himself to be able to design through the lenses of different styles. It's just been years upon years of this Phoebe stuff from brands all over. I don't expect radical things from Bottega but I just wish to see a little shakeup one day.
Okay, as you also mentioned Daniel Lee, should Burberry also be adapting the Céline aesthetic now ?Maybe you're right, but in all honesty, Zara can't clone the most eye-catching minimalist pieces to save its life. It's sad that a lot of people have it wrong in this forum and give too much credit to Zara, because it has always copied the most eye-catching minimalist pieces, but super badly. Zara could never imitate structure, it could never accurately duplicate special cuts. But just because something is superficially easily to imitate, doesn't discredit the original design, especially when the quality isn't there. If I ever buy anything from Zara, it better be tailored trousers or something of the sort, but I would never, ever buy a dupe.
In all honesty, Burberry is kind of an adaptation of the Céline aesthetic nowadays. That's the only reason I like it.Okay, as you also mentioned Daniel Lee, should Burberry also be adapting the Céline aesthetic now ?
Are we talking about brand revivals or brand renewals? Reviving Céline to renew Bottega and Burberry?
In all honesty, Burberry is kind of an adaptation of the Céline aesthetic nowadays. That's the only reason I like it.
It's not exactly a brand revival, since I do believe both Lee and Blazy were key to Phoebe's Céline success. She just had a great team, and whilst she was always an amazing designer and a visionary, she didn't do it all by herself. I believe her team has a merit in their own right.
And super yes, Bottega has all been about an old Céline revival since they hired Lee. As
I'm sure your beloved Phoebe would rather you bought her own current merchandise. 😁In all honesty, Burberry is kind of an adaptation of the Céline aesthetic nowadays. That's the only reason I like it.
It's not exactly a brand revival, since I do believe both Lee and Blazy were key to Phoebe's Céline success. She just had a great team, and whilst she was always an amazing designer and a visionary, she didn't do it all by herself. I believe her team has a merit in their own right.
And super yes, Bottega has all been about an old Céline revival since they hired Lee. Ask anyone.
I'm sure your beloved Phoebe would rather you bought her own current merchandise. 😁
I was trying to look from Phoebe's angle. Would you like it if your fans appreciated your imitators?If you don't like her, I respect it. However, you should be a bit more tolerant of other people's tastes. I like her own brand, but she had a team behind Céline, which is why I like it best. Now, if you mind, I'll go on loving what I love and commenting on it, rather than commenting on what I hate (and that's the biggest part of fashion nowadays, we need more fun minimalism).