Are we looking at the same things? I'm refering to Raf Simons for Jil Sander, and maybe one or two pieces from Calvin Klein, eg. the very first tan leather coat sent out. There's no pronounced shoulder pads, if anything, they tend to slope slightly, even though they are not narrow. Size is only one of the issues here, it's not the traditional jacket/coat in a larger size. That's the horrible mistake MJ made for his women's collection Fall 2004. The proportion here is to move away from the waist and hip, not the V or the X shapes, but square, which gives it a floating, cocoon quality. The collars are also smaller, or non-existent. The tailoring and cut are vastly different from the ugly business men suits. The look is very pared down, and any accessories will just spoil it.
From what I gather, the turning to a larger shape is probably because almost everyone is doing the same thing, even Cavalli...and the sight of one too many fashion victims in black highschool boys' suit, sleeveless shirts and porkpie hats....not to mention Lagerfeld..heheh.
I guess it's also the desire to try something different from what everyone is wearing for some 5 years now, and if it works, you stand out from the crowd, and become a trendsetter. So the hunting in unlikely places (Hugo Boss??) for the right coat started.
I thought it was a make or break moment when Raf Simons tried the new proportion for Jil Sander. If you'd followed his career, he's no stranger to the skinny suit. If he had failed, he would have been struck out, but if he succeeded, he would be ushering a new look. I heard Hussein Chalayan tried it too, but have seen no images as yet.
But back to this Burberry collection...it's probably a case of meat/poison, leaning heavily on the meat for most, but I also came across a couple of reviews that dished it. I'll post if anyone's interested.