Discussion: Who Should Be The Creative Director of Chanel?

If Blazy is in, it will be interesting to see how the engages with the Chanel logo, if at all. Because both Karl and Virginie were logo obsessed, and Matthieu is the opposite of that, so it will so interesting to see if he removes it all together, or engages with it.

If one is for sure, he will clean up the image of the brand to the effect of what Daniel Lee did with that first Bottega collection. I am picturing the first set of images to be very raw and natural a la "Old Celine" x Jurgen Teller.
 
My two cents - we've seen the quality of many designers' work fluctuate wildly depending on which house they're at - no doubt for countless reasons such as how much the brand resonates with them, the vibe of their new office, the creative team and upper management etc.

For example - Ghesquiere at Balenciaga vs Ghesquiere at Vuitton, Tisci at Givenchy vs Tisci at Burberry etc. etc.

Maybe it's worth seeing how Blazy fits in at Chanel before casting too much judgement ahead of time?
 
With all the general stupidity in the world, there are many worse choices Chanel could have made. Some of the names mentioned earlier would have been completely horrific.

Not understanding all the hate, I think Blazy is actually a relatively decent and safe choice. His name isn’t too heavily associated with a specific house among a general public, and I think (and hope) his work at Bottega wasn’t yet his creative prime. This is probably part of Chanel’s reasoning too—they likely didn’t want a designer who had already given their all in previous creative director roles. Blazy has also made some attempts at lightheartedness at Bottega (not all of them very convincing tbh) and we need more of that at Chanel too, especially after the grim VV years.

Is there someone more suitable to lead Chanel? Probably. But I’m curious to see his vision for the brand.
One thing he needs to do, however, is find a good stylist to collaborate with. Ever since he and his team started styling the Bottega shows, things have felt very... unedited.
 
Maybe it's worth seeing how Blazy fits in at Chanel before casting too much judgement ahead of time?

It's Kate Young's fault for not picking the best dress for Margot, yet Virginie receives the blame.

Given the privileged nature of this position—arguably the best one in the industry—whoever secures this role, including Blazy, deserves every ounce of scrutiny and judgment, 24/7. This includes constant oversight from the CEO, financial pressures, tiptoeing around politics, and every positive and negative/ fair or unfair comment on social media. I hold no sympathy in this regard; many designers would sell their kidneys for an opportunity of this calibre. And let's not forget the money
 
If Blazy is in, it will be interesting to see how the engages with the Chanel logo, if at all. Because both Karl and Virginie were logo obsessed, and Matthieu is the opposite of that, so it will so interesting to see if he removes it all together, or engages with it.

If one is for sure, he will clean up the image of the brand to the effect of what Daniel Lee did with that first Bottega collection. I am picturing the first set of images to be very raw and natural a la "Old Celine" x Jurgen Teller.
Chanel wont let him do logo free as in BV its the main reason Chanel always sold with KL and VV and why LV is big why Gucci got to be 3 times bigger ...won't happen ever as long as the idea on mass luxury is logo driven

the cc logo is a very powerful tool and part of chanel style ....one could argue it's not even a logo anymore at this point it's so integrated part of the design beyond decoration and seal off recontion.

people don't buy (basic) chanel rtw wear of acc for its design or fabric etc its how much does this piece makes clear its chanel for my money and for what i need it for.

CK had redone logos for jeans and underwear and they were a flop he was also there with raf at the time ....when you try to be to clever with logo/ not logo ideas it usually flops, you either embrace it or don't take the job.
 
He will be fine. Most of what people dislike about him at Bottega Veneta is because he's had to work within the aesthetic parameters of what Daniel Lee turned the company into.
I think it's more the overwhelming of ideas that don't crystallize into a strong clear newer point of view,allot of everything that could and should be good but it end up being middle of the road (well made but still middle of the road high fashion design ideas )

Lee did less but was more strong somehow with items and image, you could even argue Blazy has more ideas but don't know what to do with it , and Lee does the maximum with the few ideas he has to make a clearer and stronger image at BV.

Blazy went out side of the aesthetic parameters of lee initial ideas for BV ...i just think that it's not as far or different than lee than that Blzy is more crafty and romantic modernist you see sam with raf and pieters the always try (often fail ) to inject warmth and humanity into their modern ideals.

because its not effortless
 
I think part of every Chanel CD job is integrating the CC... Chanel jewelry is leading the brand in innovating the Double-C. I think Blazy is expected to make CC based designs just like Karl was...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,628
Messages
15,192,209
Members
86,551
Latest member
jstariellemakeup
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->