rocketqueen707
Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2006
- Messages
- 65
- Reaction score
- 0
yes you can see them here http://www.absentcinema.com/ just click on blog and scroll down...they have the full movie.
Someone told me in the commentary for Factory Girl the director actually says that he didn't care what Edie/Warhol fans thought of the film and that he wanted it to be for people who had no idea who Edie was...this scares me. When is Girl On Fire coming out!!
Yeah, maybe he set out to introduce her to people who had no idea before. But that would happen anyway, even if you try and make it accurate and satisfy the fans and people who knew her. It's about being honest...and trying your hardest. This is someone's life we're talking about....I hated all the made-up sh*t. And the way some people were portrayed....it seemed 2D. It just made me sad and angry. If it was a fiction film, I think I would have much more respect for it, would have actually enjoyed it. But it wasn't magic. And it didn't capture the magic of Edie. And I just saw only a tiny part of who she was. And I don't know the whole being of her either...no one does....but that film captured barely any portion of the haunting magic that is her, that we do know and see......it's sad that the Director said that. I don't understand his philosophy on that. It is scary indeed.yes you can see them here http://www.absentcinema.com/ just click on blog and scroll down...they have the full movie.
can we get into a dialogue about this? i find it interesting...
the way i see it is that she wasn't a sympathetic person; intriguing, stylish, tragic, yes, but not someone with whom one might empathize. and so, for reasons of narrative and catharsis, they had to change bits of her story to make her more marketable to the masses (which it ultimately failed to do, but that's neither here nor there) who go to movies to see the 'triumph of the human spirit.' (i totally and completely apologize for such a tragic phrase; my sister and i have been making fun of it constantly since we read it in the newspaper because what does it even mean?????)
i also think that it was done entirely with passion; Sienna Miller really cared about Edie as much as any 'true fan,' and i think the director, in his desire to market her to as many people as possible, did it out of admiration.
i think there is nothing wrong with tweeking the 'core portrayal' of Edie because, otherwise, it would have been this self-destructive display of narcissism. and maybe i give too much credit to the unwashed masses, but if one's interest is sparked, then one will follow through in attempts to find out as much as possible about said interest. in fact, 'factory girl' has probably opened up the discourse on Edie and pop art moreso than any other marketing in the past couple of years.
(however, i feel like i HAVE given too much credit because after 'Troy' came out, all i could think about was how Homer must be rolling over in his grave.)

)I agree, babydoll. All biases aside, it was plainly and simply just a bad movie. The script especially was rubbish. And Hickenlooper is always full of crap when he talks about Factory Girl. I've seen his posts in message boards shamelessly promoting and defending his film, and he makes it so apparent that his ego overshadows any sort of regard for the truth. He also likes to flaunt his hatred for Weisman, and it's funny that he accuses him of cashing in on Edie! Ugh that man annoys me. (Random tidbit: he said Mischa Barton and Jessica Biel were auditioned for Edie's part)
And what's sad is that people actually BELIEVE the film. Oh, the things I've seen people say all over the web! And in person!
First of all, this movie has absolutely nothing to do with art. For anyone who knows anything about cinema this movie was horrible, even for those who don't know who Edie is. It's just a bad movie, bad acting, Sienna and Guy aren't even bad actors and i'm not blaiming them, but overall the acting was BAD. Secondly, the whole story of this movie is saying Bob Dylan and Edie had a serious relationship...no one knows if this is true and even if it is it is not THAT significant in Edie's story, so why make it the main story of the movie?? Thirdly, the people who knew Edie who were associated with this film were either in it for some extra cash/fame, were trying to bring some truth to a fictional story, or are crazy! Liberty Bell said that Jonathan is a bit off and the rest of the family didn't approve.