I have to disagree-I thought that the Kate Moss Nikon ad was great.Urban Stylin said:unfortunately the less fashion work pays more than the high fashion work despite the fact that many of the ads usually come out looking less than desirable.
masquerade said:madonna for h&m is such a bad idea. no one who looks at those ads will seriously believe that she wears those clothes.
same thing happened when gap signs Sarah Jessica Parker and theyall but fired her because she didnt work as a spokesperson
I can't wait to see the ads thenstsgroup14 said:Isabeli's Revlon is a sure thing. It was already launced in New York and she was with Eva Mendes. I don't know about Heather
Pastry said:can i just say that the verace fragrance advertisement with (poor) iselin steiro is ug-ly!they made her look like karolina kurkova..
KhaoticKharma said:we should simply judge them on a scale of how well done the sluttiness looks![]()
KhaoticKharma said:When push comes to shove, I think that Versace campaigns should be judged on a different standard than say Marc Jacobs campaigns or Michael Kors. Versace is sl*tty. So are the clothes of Roberto Cavalli. I don't think that we should ever even expect to see chic and intellectual looks in brands like that- we should simply judge them on a scale of how well done the sluttiness looks![]()
Sweet rus said:BUNDCHEN CASHGISELE BUNDCHEN may have turned her attention to saving the Amazon's Xingu River earlier this week, but she's still raking in the cash. The Brazilian supermodel is rumoured to have posed for a new advertising campaign for Apple in New York last week, which will have banked her more than a million. As well as talking about the shoot on her website, Gisele also mentions her new contract with Dolce & Gabbana. Apparently wanting a degree of exclusivity, the Italian designers waited until her deal with Louis Vuitton came to an end before signing her (and paying her $2 million, we hear), to be the face of their new The One fragrance, which was inspired by her, too. (June 1 2006, AM)![]()
Dolly Jones
vogue.co.uk
bun-bun said:^ No way, happycanadian. Sorry to disagree with you, but the reason why Nikki was so successful is that she had all sorts of "faces" to give to the camera. Nikki could be shy and playful, sexy and grown up, Miami beach bunny, cool older sister, etc. But Karolina? Although the resemblance in the mole/hair color is there, Karolina's "faces" seriously lack character. She can only do sexy, and that's about it. In my mind, she has two faces: smiling and non-smiling as outlined by that interesting UK Vogue issue in 2001. Those two faces would never work in promoting Covergirl products.