Fashionista Babe
Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2004
- Messages
- 83
- Reaction score
- 0
Her body is nicer than a whole lot of normal people's bodies..and she didn't do any extreme training or surgery like those who appear to have nice bodies.
kathyjeanc said:who needs a great body when you have a face like kristin's
thats true..
kathyjeanc said:who needs a great body when you have a face like kristin's
Well, while I can understand someone holding her face in such high esteem personally I don't quite see it. She's too cutesy for my liking. Not to knock her, though, she certainly reaches beautiful at her best and I bestow that compliment...sparingly.
With regard to the figure issue, however, I honestly do think it's nothing special. It's not bad; just very average and common for her age depending on whether she does any training (and she shouldn't be held to a model's standard, since she's an actress). Although it is all too true that as a matter of personal preference, I am very drawn to a certain type of figure and thus tend not to be forgiving of the (youthful) figures that stray from that type. Kristin doesn't have the lines that I like. To give you an idea of what that is, my idea of a perfect figure (or a figure as close to perfection as I may ever see) is Pania Rose's.FrockRadar8 said:Don't get me wrong, she's gorgeous, but why the hell is she playing an indian woman? She doesn't look indian, and she's not even part indian. They couldn't find a SINGLE indian woman to play that? Out of like half a billion people?
Theres my two cents.
galviggo said:Very pretty face that occasionally touches beautiful. Strong touch of the exotic. Interesting mix of the cheerful-playful-childlike and the astute. Gorgeouscoloring.
Still, something really holds her back.
She hasn't much of a body. Total lack of a feminine midsection, improper, graceless lines, not much of a bosom, and her legs look stout.

