Phuel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2010
- Messages
- 5,733
- Reaction score
- 8,733
I believe that's because the women's side has more history (75+ years) and culture (after war optimism in the 50s, female emancipation in the 60s and 70s, the revival of Haute Couture in the 80s and 90s) and several of influential designers (Dior, YSL, Galliano and Simons are all quoted as inspiration for young designers, can't say the same for Chiuri) behind it.
Dior Homme/Men, however, is a 21st century invention. It was never conceived by Christian Dior himself and was created as a means of expansion and licensing.
This is why Chiuri's job holds and will most likely always hold significantly more importance than Jones'.
Why Kim is considered the saviour of Dior is beyond me though...
Good point.
Women’s fashion and its designers will always be more important than men’s fashion and its designers. It’s an enduring, unshakable monolith that’s hard to bypass even if that menswear designer is more creative and visionary than the womenswear designer. All of us here weren’t alive when Christian Dior had his impact, and for that— people tend to idealize his era. But we were all alive when Hedi had his impact on men-- and women, with Dior Homme. And that impact is still relevant 25 years later (and likely to endure).
Hedi’s impact on menswear (and the stylish women that wear his men’s) with Dior Homme can be comparable to Christian Dior’s impact on womenswear. The standards he created, and set in fashion ought not be minimized because it doesn't have the history of the womenswear, or his sensibility has never been as theatrical as someone like Galliano at Dior (… and I’ve enjoyed Ferre's and Raf’s Dior as well. However, their contributions will never have the monumental impact that Galliano created, no matter how LVMH may want to erase Galliano’s Dior). How Hedi took a tired men’s consumer-end license brand Christian Dior that polluted the bargain bins of mid-range department store, and made it into a highly-coveted and more importantly, influential label that’s still relentlessly and highly referenced to this day, is a highly admirable feat— in both its commercial and creative success. But after Hedi, Dior Homme has been a corporate shell of a brand in terms of any creative impact. Of course, the occasional, prerequisite basics of classic suiting and coats remain decent— even under that Kim person, but no matter how desperately begging for relevance the brand has been under his tenure with its tedious collabs, it’s all just basic merch, immediately forgotten once it drops. Hedi’s Dior Homme on the other hand, have passed down to covetable and grailed collectables. It really deserves the same fashion historical importance as what Christian Dior proposed and accomplished for womenswear.
(Maria Grazia… I don’t despise her, and maybe that makes my opinions of her a tad less scathing, seething […I’ll reserve my loathing for that Kim person LOL]. But aside from contributing to healthy profit margin for her handlers, she will have absolutely no creative nor any worthy impact on the label and fashion. It’s all just merchandise for the lesser times we're in. But still superior to the current Dior boyswear.)