Models Who Aren't That Tall

[foreverandnone]

That's Laragh McCann behind Lara Stone.
McCann is listed as 5'9" on the Women Management website, and Lara Stone is listed as 5'9.5" on her compcard.
I never knew .5" was so much! And if my memory serves me correctly, I believe all the shoes were the same height.

And I do know, that Laragh is placed a little further from the photographer, so we can give 1" max, but still.
(sorry about the quality, I have no scanner)
credit: Vogue US

 

[D77q1]

But Lara (who's def. no more than 5'9) is much closer to the camera, and it's not a good angle to compare heights either. Even if that was 5'11+ Tanya in the background, Lara would still look taller.

 

[foreverandnone]

But Lara (who's def. no more than 5'9) is much closer to the camera, and it's not a good angle to compare heights either. Even if that was 5'11+ Tanya in the background, Lara would still look taller.

I don't think you read my post fully. I mentioned that.
Even in this image, where she is closer to the camera than the other model, she looks quite short.

And in this one

credit: style.com

 

[kissmesweet]

Emma Watson signed with Storm...?

 

[D77q1]

I don't think you read my post fully. I mentioned that.
Even in this image, where she is closer to the camera than the other model, she looks quite short.

And in this one

credit: style.com

I was already typing my reply when you edited your post, so I didn't see that until now. Sorry.

I have no doubts that Laragh is one the short side, but so is Lara. Back in the day she was listed as 5'9' and even 5'8.5''....

So I think my point is still valid.

 

[foreverandnone]

I was already typing my reply when you edited your post, so I didn't see that until now. Sorry.

I have no doubts that Laragh is one the short side, but so is Lara. Back in the day she was listed as 5'9' and even 5'8.5''....

So I think my point is still valid.

Yes of course, Lara is much closer to the camera, which creates the illusion, but still. I understand your point 100%.
Yeah, I don;t understand why people say Lara Stone is shorter than 5'9". Her legs are like, woah and she really does look 5'9". Oh well
B)

 

[foreverandnone]

Emma Watson signed with Storm...?

It might be a celebrity thing. I know Drew Barrymore and Hilary Duff are signed with IMG as celebrities.

I shall check this out...

 

[foreverandnone]

CHANEL WORKS ITS MAGIC

TEEN actress Emma Watson, best known as her alter ego Hermione Granger in the Harry Potter saga, has been signed by Kate Moss' agency Storm – with a view to landing a prestigious contract with Chanel. The 17-year-old has travelled the globe this week with co-stars Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grint to attend premieres of the eagerly-awaited film Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix and has worn a different Chanel dress to every one. "Let's be honest, I have enough money never to have to work again," Watson – who earns a reported £2 million for each Harry Potter film she makes – candidly told David Letterman during an interview in the US, for which she wore a soft-grey, pleated Chanel shift. "But I would never want that." Signing with Chanel would be likely to earn Watson around £2 million, according to the Daily Express, but though a deal with the house would dramatically affect her already-packed schedule, the actress is adamant she'll never let work affect her education. Like supermodel Lily Cole, she is planning to apply to Cambridge University to further her studies within the next couple of years. (July 13 2007, AM) - Vogue.co.uk

-------------------------------

Doesn't really say she was signed to actually model. Lots of celebrites seek representation by agencies when they are doing a campaign. I'll still search for some more information. I will post if I find anything. Oh yeah, she's apparantly 5'4" - if that has anything to do with it.

 

[style_star]

^On IMDB, she used to be listed as 5'5", and now she's listed as 5'6", however IMDB has a history of messing with height, so she could be shorter. Lindsay Lohan used to be listed as 5'5", then 5'7", then 5'6", and then 5'5" again. Emma Roberts was once listed as 5'2.5", and then 5'5" until her Teen Vogue interview/article proved that she is only 5'2" and they dropped it back down.

And the same can be stated for LOADS of other celebrities. I go on IMDB a lot so I would know.

 

[Sweet rus]

style.com

 

[foreverandnone]

style.com

Do you knwo if they are wearing the same kind of shoes?

 

[xmodel citizen]

Gemma is nearly 6'0" while Luca and Amanda are around 5'7"-5'8".

 

[KhaoticKharma]

^ I'd say those are good estimates.

 

[foreverandnone]

Er, Gemma is not 6'0"
O_o

 

[xmodel citizen]

I've always heard that Gemma is very tall, 5'11" or slightly taller a la Caroline Trentini. I just checked and she's apparently listed at 178 cm but if she's 5'10", it seems like she'd be not so much taller than 5'7"-5'8" Luca Gadjas. In that picture she appears to be about 4" inches taller than Luca, making her 5'11" or 6'0".

EDIT: Actually, is there a picture of Gemma with her sister Sophie? I remember that she's very tall, maybe I'm confusing the two. Seeing them side-by-side would help.

 

[foreverandnone]

I disagree. She's been listed ad 5'9.5" before and there is no reason as to why any agency wouldn't list her as 5'11" if she wasn't.
She's the same height as Lily Donaldson...

 

[eisley]

gemma is a bit taller than lily d

 

[xmodel citizen]

I googled it and Sophie is the one who's 5'11", nearly 6'0" or more.

 

[KhaoticKharma]

^No way, Sophie is like 6'2! Gemma is certainly over 5'10.5...

 

[gia0202]

lara stone has been modeling for 4 years or so. i think her height listing changed since she has gorwn. i have met her, hung out briefly with her--she is defineitely about 5.10 or so. she is not short.