mr.Hedi Slimane -the perfect gambling of Intimelly | the Fashion Spot

mr.Hedi Slimane -the perfect gambling of Intimelly

Whimsicalist

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2004
Messages
537
Reaction score
0
i just read ,re-read a thread The End of affair" an article copied from NY times "
and asked myself isn't today situation with hedi doesn't refuted all written from a woman.

hedi even outside the designing table produce perfection,beaury!
it is very beautiful to see how is gambling against industry,capital,because he do not allowin to capital to dictates it needs.
he the artist is who constraining the industry!

and he is designing his new job..
he gambling against arnault and pinault.

playing with announces.

the old cliche was

if you seek job ,this mean you have to fit to what company seek .
they shouldn't design a job for some personae.

but individ had to fit to the job!

but hedi design the very condition in fashion.
intemely.
this s showing the nature of postmodern perfection today!
to design unsuiteness.

and to create against the power.against authorities.

using their fears.conflicts..(but this is the low explanation)

i am not sure that my english is "fits" to the topic.
to the quentessence of this beaty..
i need other kind of languige,of expression.

may be it will became obvious very soon what i mean.

it those article from sept 2006 there was named few designers-jil,helmut.

helmut is back,as i understand with spring collection-the designer itself not,but the matque is back!
there was missed a name
and i am very interested
what hap with phillip dubuc?

do you know something!
is this label and designer still active!?

have you love this hedislimane new attire.
the designer is designer in everything..
btw,and this is not a joke.

the real designer(or designer of reality) should be engaged with the perfection of his own physiological processess.
sleeping,eating,bowel(ing) secreting,(the importance of anal-stage freud(oral,genital,phallic stage)eliminative-retentive -when child become independant from parents control..and is aware how he might control his body...)walking(remember dandies who designed it's own neuro-ticks.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hedi's situation with PPR is not all that novel. Look Dior when he left Lelong, YSL when he left Dior, Donna Karan when she left Anne Klein...etc

I would say this is one of the rare occasions that a designer has held such command over his future and most of all his name. Hedi is no chump, and considering his intimate friendships with Lagerfeld and YSL, he certainly wouldn't be. But we'll see, you can't count your chickens before they hatch.
 
certainly I count this!

he got his friends and he need of support!

i am sure that they are too close to him this days,

but this prove that designers knows the industry 's habit..
they can unite them self,the old aristos of fashion with young and representative(them-ysl,karl ideal) designer.


this is creativity,too!

to be in the middle of what is outside!
to be in the moiddle ,in center of insideness -this name is body..habeo corpus.but not transceeding energy!

-------
i am glad that you note this support.

isn't this good for tradition,for things that we name-legacy.

this separate very obviously the mythologic labels,splitting them on two-designers and companies..

can i understand that you compare hedi with michael shoemacher work for ferarri
 
or may be ,in your words we can read that there is some kind of judeo-masons,camora of designers.and he is a favorite of the generals of the loggia.

by the way the theme who support hedi is very interesting!

few weeks ago in my space there was a bulletine about this

Marx had one Angel (engels)and one Eagel(hegel) on his back ,too!
engels supported him financially,hegel dialectically..and here is the formula of capital.
money + dialectic gives capital ..books of "capital",too!
 
RE: Phillipe Dubuc

His label has had some difficulties. From what I understand, he's declared bankruptcy, but his store here in Montreal is still open. I'm not sure what his future plans are, but he is still designing.
 
Whimsicalist said:
Marx had one Angel (engels)and one Eagel(hegel) on his back ,too!
engels supported him financially,hegel dialectically..and here is the formula of capital.
money + dialectic gives capital ..books of "capital",too!

:hardhead:
Tarkovsky, get out this body... NOW!
 
a little optimistically put, and sugar-coated, but i like what you're saying
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,381
Messages
15,259,520
Members
88,359
Latest member
Lini
Back
Top