If he has a house in America, then I reside in furthest Patagonia at the Estancia Gravamen del Gringo. Paul wouldn't deign to live here, and I don't blame him, though he appears to make frequent autumnal migratory paths through the country, stopping in at various Staples Centers, PacBell Parks, and Pepsi Pavillions, nesting in the girders and cooing until a groundskeeper shoos him away with a broom. Living in America?-- that ain't ever gonna happen. I'm guessing he and Heather have an American-based fiduciary trust-type thing that needs its locks changed.VainJane said:That's what I was wondering too....maybe the McCartneys have a house in America and in order to figure out who gets the house, they have to file papers in America as well ?
contactmusic.comSIR PAUL MCCARTNEY and his estranged wife HEATHER MILLS have spent 40 minutes alone together in a desperate attempt to end their bitter divorce battle amicably. The former BEATLE reportedly invited Mills into his US holiday home in East Hampton on Wednesday (30AUG06) after she picked up their three-year-old daughter BEATRICE. Shocked security guards were asked to leave the scene while the pair tried to resolve their differences. A source tells British newspaper the Sunday Mirror, "Paul and Heather have been doing their best to avoid each other for months. But they have decided to put their differences aside for the sake of their daughter."
03/09/2006 15:20
EDIT: Should read "Billy Joel's third wife's little sister won't do." Third time's a charm, Paul. We can make mashed potatoes, too. I can pare 'em, you can mash 'em.mellowdrama said:I'll put a smile on your face--Billy Joel's wife's little sister won't do--she can't ignore you like I can!
Rod Stewart says he feels sorry for Sir Paul McCartney. The Scottish rocker insists he understands the heartache Paul has been battling following his split from wife, Heather Mills, and admits his divorce to model Rachel Hunter was a sad chapter in his life.
http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_27268352.shtmlPaul McCartney Divorce Deal: $72 Million to Gag Heather Mills? By Susan Hatch
Sep 13, 2006 As the Paul McCartney divorce from Heather Mills becomes more and more public each day a report has emerged that Paul McCartney has reportedly offered his estranged wife Heather Mills $72 million to divorce and never discuss their marriage in public or to the media. That's some serious cash and according to reports the offer was made in secret.
***But as this thing plays out - it appears that nothing is secret anymore. Digital Spy cites PR guru Max Clifford and he believes that stories such as this one may be a result of Mills' efforts to exert pressure. "She is on the attack and he is on the defense," he commented. "He is the one trying to settle as quietly and quickly as possible.
"He doesn't want his dirty washing aired in public and she knows that. The more that appears in the papers about her being locked out of the house and the bank accounts frozen, the more embarrassed he becomes and the more pressure he is under."
***The alleged offer would allow the former model to receive the money over 20 years -- provided she never reveals any details of the pair's four-year marriage. The story comes from the British tabloid 'News Of The World.'
The source tells the magazine "Heather must reveal nothing about their personal lives. No books, no TV specials. She has one hell of a story and Paul wants a settlement to make sure it never comes out. Any breach of the conditions would allow him to stop the payments," the source dishes.
"So basically he has control of Heather for the rest of his life."
For the low-low price of $72 Million US.
--Susan Hatch writes from Phoenix
McCartney Divorce Heats Up
29 September 2006
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, MS Sans Serif]Serious allegations about Sir Paul McCartney's treatment of estranged wife Heather Mills will be made public in the divorce courts.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, MS Sans Serif]Lawyer Antony Julius has been compiling a file of complaints Heather has made about the former Beatles legend and Heather is reportedly determined not to be portrayed as the "bad guy" in court.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, MS Sans Serif]A source told Britain's Daily Mail newspaper: "Heather has made a series of very serious allegations against Paul which are set to come out in court.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, MS Sans Serif]She feels her character has been damaged irrevocably by stories leaked about her. If all goes to plan, what has happened in this marriage will not remain secret.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, MS Sans Serif]"Heather will not want to go down in history as 'Evil Heather' - the bad guy in this marriage."[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, MS Sans Serif]Since the pair split in May, allegations emerged that Heather was once was a high-class prostitute - claims which she vehemently denies - and pictures were published of her posing naked in a German sex book.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, MS Sans Serif]The source revealed: "Heather feels she has been struggling against the might of 'Team Macca' since the break-up. She feels that Paul's side has been constantly leaking stories about her. Stories about her being offered £30 million for a quickie divorce and turning it down.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, MS Sans Serif]"There has been no offer yet. She has £1 million in a bank account and that's it."[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, MS Sans Serif]A key part of the evidence against Paul is said to be the taped conversation between the 64-year-old and his daughter Stella.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, MS Sans Serif]The source said: "The pair are heard speaking unguardedly about their true feelings for Heather. The fact that this tape fell into Heather's hand has been unfortunate for Paul and is bound to cost him dear. Heather's lawyers will certainly be using it as a bargaining tool."[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, MS Sans Serif]-Bang! Showbiz[/FONT]
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20628693-2703,00.htmlMills-McCartney alleges Paul beat Linda
AAP October 23, 2006
LONDON: Paul McCartney's divorce from Heather Mills has taken another nasty turn, with the former Beatle's estranged wife claiming he physically abused his first wife, Linda.
The claim comes just days after newspapers published apparently leaked divorce papers detailing Heather Mills McCartney's allegations against Sir Paul, including that he attacked her.
British newspapers are reporting that the 38-year-old Mills, a former model, has told friends she believes she has damning information about Paul and Linda's 29-year marriage. Linda McCartney died of breast cancer in 1998.
The Sunday Mirror says Sir Paul, who was devoted to Linda and rarely spent a night away from her in their 29-year marriage, is aware of the latest claims.
"This is a step too far. Next she'll be saying she's discovered a brand new colour. It's getting more ridiculous by the minute," the Sunday Mirror quoted a source close to Sir Paul.
"There's one thing to make all the claims she has last week but this is just outrageous. It's nonsense, Paul and Linda had a fantastic marriage."
Sir Paul's official spokesman declined to comment.
A close friend told The Mail on Sunday: "She told me that he did to Linda what he did to her. She says that staff of Paul's told her that Linda had also suffered abuse."
The Sunday Mirror says Mills also taunted Sir Paul's fashion designer daughter Stella by telling her she knew of incidents involving her mother and father, saying to her: "You're so full of bitterness, Stella.
"Is it because you can't forgive your father for what he did to your mother?"
Documents which emerged last week alleged that, while in Los Angeles in 2002, McCartney "grabbed (Mills) by the neck and pushed her over a coffee table".
They also claimed that McCartney lunged at her with the broken stem of a wine glass which cut her arm and made it bleed.
McCartney, 64, has said in a statement through his lawyers that the only correct place for him to respond to the allegations is in the divorce courts.
http://www.penguin.co.uk/nf/Book/BookDisplay/0,,9780718146672,00.htmlExplores many keys to health for the body, mind and soul.
Heather's approach to feeling fit, healthy and happy is the perfect introduction to the whole area of well-being.
Rather than working on one aspect in isolation, you can explore many keys to health for the body, mind and soul; the book includes chapters on confidence boosting, simple meditation techniques, nutrition facts and figures and fitting in exercise to a hectic lifestyle. Put the keys together and unlock the vibrant, vital inner you.
Media: Mills and McCartney . . . must I take sides?
Media
Peter Wilby
Monday 30th October 2006
The posh papers are never very helpful on these occasions, offering a mixture of world-weary cynicism and high-minded lamentation
I have been mugging up on the Heather Mills/Paul McCartney divorce. This is not a subject on which, if one is to be a fully participating member of our vibrant 21st-century democracy, it is possible to be neutral, or even apathetic. Even my wife wants to know which side I'm on. There is no equivalent of the Lib Dems to vote for and, as a press commentator, I can't refuse to attend the polling station.
The latest chapter in this saga began on 18 October when the Daily Mail published leaked court papers detailing the Mills case against McCartney. He had, she alleged, got drunk and stoned, beaten her up, stabbed her with a broken wine glass, stopped her breastfeeding and forbidden her to use an antique bedpan. These, wrote Deborah Orr in the Independent, sounded like "fairly commonplace symptoms of a marriage that wasn't working (and even . . . of one that's perfectly all right, really)". Which gives us an interesting insight into the family life that Orr shares with the novelist Will Self, but not much more.
The posh papers - though they now devote almost as much space as the red tops to celebrity divorces - are never helpful on these occasions, I find. They offer a mixture of world-weary cynicism and high-minded lamentation. One is reminded of Malcolm Muggeridge's celebrated spoof of a typical Guardian editorial: "It is greatly to be hoped that wiser counsels will yet prevail." Thus, the Times's Jane Shilling, drawing on the wisdom of John Donne, wrote that "the McCartney break-up diminishes us all". It had "no redemptive quality".
But I'm not looking for redemption, only an opinion. Here, the more downmarket papers provide, if the McCartneys will forgive the term, more red meat. The trouble is, there's so much of it to get through.
After the initial leak - which, the Guardian prissily pointed out, breached the Judicial Proceedings (Regulation of Reports) Act 1926 - further allegations came thick and fast from both sides. Sir Paul, the Mail assured us, was "maintaining a dignified silence". However, like so many celebrities and politicians, he has amazingly garrulous friends.
He was "incandescent with rage" and "suffering deeply", the friends are reported to have claimed. He had needed to visit a psychiatrist and only the children of his first marriage had saved him from a breakdown.
Next came Mills's friends. She was in "floods of tears" and her lawyer, Anthony Julius, was "frothing with rage" (possibly a more serious condition than being incandescent). McCartney was trying to get custody of their daughter, Beatrice. He had allegedly beaten up his first wife, Linda.
Your turn, Macca. Heather smashed chairs, threw ornaments, and aimed a bottle of ketchup at her husband, "aides" alleged to the News of the World.
Lots of anger, lots of violence, and vegetarian food all over the carpet, but I still need an opinion. Piers Morgan, a former Daily Mirror editor, had originally introduced Mills - "this vengeful, shameless, ghastly woman" - to McCartney and for that he was now "filled with guilt and sorrow", he wrote in the Mail. On the other hand, Lisa Norris, also in the Mail, reported that McCartney had stormed out of a press conference she had organised while Mills - "a strong, attractive woman" - had "discreetly mouthed" apologies. And Fergus Shanahan in the Sun explained that McCartney married her mainly because "she was terrific in bed" and just went off her "once the bedroom fireworks had dimmed". Damning evidence, I thought; all men are bastards, as a red-top male columnist should know.
In the Mirror, however, Fiona Phillips reported that McCartney had once given her a cup of tea. Well, Heather Mills once gave me coffee in a plastic cup. No, not her, but a namesake who was a colleague on the Independent, and now works for Private Eye. She alleged in the Mail on Sunday that Mills 1 tried to further her TV career by claiming authorship of pieces written by Mills 2.
That decided me. The coffee wasn't much cop, but Mills 2 had honestly warned me it wouldn't be, thus proving, in red-top commentators' logic, that she is and always will be a trustworthy woman. Then I looked back to Saturday's Mail and saw that Mills (Mills 1, that is) reckons she got all her rows with McCartney on digital camcorder.
I think I shall wait to see the films. "The public will make up their own mind," wrote Richard Stott in the Sunday Mirror. I had been under the impression that judges adjudicated in divorce cases, but I am clearly mistaken. The proper end of this newspaper feeding frenzy is for Mills and McCartney to post all their evidence on the web, and then to allow the populace to vote, Big Brother-style, on who scoops the jackpot. I promise to have made up my mind by then.