Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Ad Campaigns' started by TZ001, Sep 23, 2020.
^what this photo is supposed to sell ? the mirror ?
And the audience that appreciates people farting in rubber-look clothing is going to be far bigger than the one for Freja in that lingerie get-up.
My delusional benefit of doubt has officially expired. What in god's name is all this??
I'm normally a fan of Juergen's work but this is terrible. He's not doing Freja any justice.
They always manage to make Freja look sickly.
So you mean to tell me Vaccarello gave, in my opinion, the best show/collection of FW 2020 and this is the campaign we get for it ? I certainly hoping that the bourgeois-meets-fetish element was going to continue in the campaign and I am thoroughly disappointed with these images we've seen so far. They are neither inspiring nor aspirational.
The first shot with Freja looks like it's an outtake from next month's British Vogue editorial, which is some sort of Saint Laurent advertorial. Did he extract this shot from that edit or was the edit copied off the campaign? Either way, how on earth does this lazy scammer get away with stuff like this?!?!
Vogue Paris Digital Edition
they work so much with Gaspar Noe, they even sponsored his latest Lux Aeterna which was first YSL promo short movie shown at Cannes, they produced few advertorials with him, i can imagine easily his shots with typical YSL-Vaccarello era girls (more than only Freja) lets even leave here Laetitia, she is historically YSL girl. in some Paris sex club with some hints of blurry sexual activity (lets recall love and irreversible scenes) on the background and girls with laid-back attitude posing in this fashionable latexwear mixed with YSL archive blazers and blouses.
Instead we have
that useless frame
this headless aesthetic
this wrong choice of body type for clothes especially this off-nude underwear worn on flat-chected Freja combined with latex leggings on the 3rd shot
and this Laetitia shot which is a copy of Helmut newton works (girl eating roses in the garden) and her latest 032 cover-story fw 2019 shot by Pierre Ange Carlotti
pinterest, my archive
Gosh, whats wrong with Kering?
Wow, the 032C set and this campaign is a near-direct copy. Don't get me wrong, it happens all the time with the smaller photographers. I mean, Paola Kudacki made a career ripping off Newton. But for a photographer of Teller's stature, a supposed 'professor' of such high values who walked away from Marc Jacobs because shooting Miley Cyrus was beneath him, but clearly not shamelessly ripping off someone for the almighty buck.
Again....how on earth does he get away with it?
i must say, that 032c image was far more better than this
Can’t help but love the shot with the yellow hose. Love the composition and all the colours together.
"Saint Laurent" editorial for Vogue Korea September 2020 with Ella Zaka could be a better campaign than the actual campaign
The photo of Laetitia eating rose is beautiful. I think its better than the one by Newton. If there is an issue which has that ad I will get it just for this image.
UK Harper's Bazaar Digital Edition
UK Elle Digital Edition
a bit better, but gosh i am soooo bored of this cropped heads
Really cropping shots and details close-ups was good only at Testino/Roitfeld works when you have some sultry details like nude boob or some accessory out of the place but really taking attention. otherwise it seems unnecessary, i understand they want to make accent on shoes and latexwear but damn, they`re obvious...
just want to remind you guys that we have 6 images with heads out of 14 at the moment
where the hell is Binx?
why you think she is feature?