glamrockgal
Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2007
- Messages
- 428
- Reaction score
- 23
kitsch + disappointed 

MODERATOR'S NOTE: Please can all of theFashionSpot's forum members remind themselves of the Forum Rules. Thank you.
No further!Laetitia makes Freja entirely irrelevant in this, she's absolutely sublime in this. Lovely to see Debra as well!
they work so much with Gaspar Noe, they even sponsored his latest Lux Aeterna which was first YSL promo short movie shown at Cannes, they produced few advertorials with him, i can imagine easily his shots with typical YSL-Vaccarello era girls (more than only Freja) lets even leave here Laetitia, she is historically YSL girl. in some Paris sex club with some hints of blurry sexual activity (lets recall love and irreversible scenes) on the background and girls with laid-back attitude posing in this fashionable latexwear mixed with YSL archive blazers and blouses.
Instead we have
- that useless frame
- this headless aesthetic
- this wrong choice of body type for clothes especially this off-nude underwear worn on flat-chected Freja combined with latex leggings on the 3rd shot
- and this Laetitia shot which is a copy of Helmut newton works (girl eating roses in the garden) and her latest 032 cover-story fw 2019 shot by Pierre Ange Carlotti
![]()
pinterest, my archive
Gosh, whats wrong with Kering?
link UK Vogue October 1994 : Linda Evangelista by Juergen TellerI just found this, I wonder where it's form. Looks like the phenomenon is more common than we thought.
its a digital-only shoot with Debra, special for their ysl.com store, this dress is exclusively for online store, so technically, she is not a part of the campaign.Why aren't they releasing Debra's shots? Or is there only a video? The disrespect.