Terry Richardson’s Work is Degrading to Women

Yea and you keep defending him saying he's a p*rn photographer so it's ok, but I really don't think he would consider himself one. He has said doesn't like p*rn and he has exhibits of his work in Art gallery's, he considers it art, do I don't see how you can defend him by saying its p*rn, so it's legal.
 
Its not a real discussion about female sexual victimization until the r*pe apologists show up....
 
I saw that Sara Ziff documentary.. and immedietly thought the guy she was talking about was Terry
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tumblr_kzosncI0Ho1qa42jro1_500.jpg


Ha! This is a pretty passive, not to mention arrogant, defense.
Caption reads "Me,Luchino Visconti,Helmut Newton and Bob Richardson."

From terryrichardsonsdiary.com
 
Terry Richardson Update: Condé Nast CEO Responds

Thanks to our writing campaign protesting the unconscionable behavior of fashion/perv photographer Terry Richardson, Condé Nast’s CEO Charles Townsend has responded to our concerns. Note that Mr. Townsend is “appalled” by what he now knows about Richardson’s conduct. Yay Chuck! And yay Andrea!
“People have the power.” -Patti Smith
From: “Townsend, Chuck”
<[email protected]>
Date: March 22, 2010 10:46:55 AM EDT
To: Andrea
Subject: RE: photographer Terry Richardson
Thank you, Andrea. I’ve received more email on the subject this morning than I can read, unfortunately. I have forwarded it to our fashion people here. They make the creative decisions. I’m appalled at what I have read. Respectfully, C. Townsend​





So it's up to Anna now. If she has any common sense, she will stop publishing his work in her magazine. If not I have lost my hero. :(
 
So it's up to Anna now. If she has any common sense, she will stop publishing his work in her magazine. If not I have lost my hero. :(


[/indent]

I agree. Without the support of the top magazines and designers, his behaviour will not change.

I really hope that the fashion community will make a stand on this and not continue to let this person keep on doing what their doing...
 
i'm shocked the ceo even responded. they must be really feeling the heat! now if anna continues to support him...
 
After this scandal began rolling out, Terry hasn't posted anymore nude pics on his diary. Maybe he really is feeling the heat.
 
Surely Anna W is a decent woman. Sure, she's a b*tch but she's a decent b*tch.
 
Is it anyone here that actually likes his art?

Yes. His satanist editorial with Lily Donaldson for Vogue Paris a couple of years ago was wonderful. For example...I even like his Sisley campaigns despite myself.
 
Wow, this is going at a rate I could not imagine! CEO's responding? Geez! I doubt it will have any effect though. He's got a so many major clients (editors, designers, even models probably) backing him up, that nothing will happen I think. And even if something does happen, it will backlash a la Kate Moss and he'll be all over our magazines again in 1,5 years time.

Personally, I do hope that something will change. I do not like his aesthetic. I always get appalled when I see him posing with a big smile and two thumbs up surrounded by naked models flashing their pearlywhites. I do not appreciate his vision and never enjoy his photography. And his commercial stuff for H&M for example might as well have been shot by anyone else IMO, so...
BUT, the fact that I do not appreciate his artistic aesthetic does not mean I think he should be banned from magazines. Everyone is free to have their own artistic and creative vision and everyone has the right to express that.
However, if models will actually step forward and speak up about the way he has 'abused' them, then rumors will become fact and maybe he should even be locked away. In that case, his work should be banned. As long as models keep saying 'a certain photographer asked me to hold his d!ck and twist it around, but I won't say names' (like that girl in Picture Me told about) then nothing will happen.
 
oook wow, i never thought i'd hear such praise, especially after this scandal, of this disgusting man
that is just disturbing
 
^I think he needs to be forced out of his creative vision to something more subtle. I consider him one of the best fashion photographers but he is so overcome by the silly and/or lust it gets boring. So I like the odd subtle editorial he's been part of - I consider those some of the best of the best. And then there have been some vulgarian work that was great as well - Sisley, Gucci - but we are past that p*rn ideal now and with the impending pin-up trend it would be nice to see less of the Heffnerian male gaze and more of the magic of the real, yet supernatural, female body in its most beautiful form.

Richardson seems to do his best work when it's the least sexual, although the sexual aspect is the driving force. It's sort of weird, but I suppose not that strange.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If models feel that they can tell him (and other photographers) off when they step over boundaries, without retaliation, that would be a start.

If a shoot is not booked as a nude shoot, then it's not OK to change it.
If it's booked as a nude or semi-nude shoot, the photographer doesn't touch the model, the makeup artist makes adjustments.
Is it really necessary to have a convention that the photographer keeps his clothes on?
No video or secondary photographers on a nude shoot.
Agency has to OK nude photo selections if props are involved, including liquids.
Agencies to tell young models what the boundaries are and provide assertiveness training. /*in your dreams*/


And everyone who expects some girl to come forward with specific accusations, get real. Even being involved in a simple law case is an endless headache, and a financial nightmare. In a sexual case, assume Mother Teresa would be branded a sl*t.
 
Richardson seems to do his best work when it's the least sexual, although the sexual aspect is the driving force. It's sort of weird, but I suppose not that strange.

As an aside, I know a photographer who shoots nudes and incorporates sexual activity into the scenarios, and he has done a lot of exploration into the idea of the boundaries - about how, as a man, he has formed social expectations about how far he's expected to push things with women, what happens when he doesn't act on it, and how that changes the interaction between model and photographer.

Most of his images are about female self-sexuality, so he's literally not part of the picture, and a lot of his effort, when creating the images, goes into providing the space for the women to be free in their self-expression. He has to establish a bond where they know he will not take advantage, even on a psychic level, so to speak.

(He's also done work with men, and challenged himself on assumptions and reactions that he has about same-sex eroticism.)

So in my eyes, it's entirely possible for someone to explore the sexual boundaries of the model-photographer relationship without it descending into potential abuse. And even if the photographer wanted to place themselves into the centre of the action, some careful thought could produce interesting imagery without sacrificing either the erotic side of things or a sense of respect for people.

But taking advantage of people in the course of creating your work shows no imagination at all. Just because you can, doesn't mean you should - and if you are, it's a sign that you're not working hard enough at what really matters.
 
As an aside, I know a photographer who shoots nudes and incorporates sexual activity into the scenarios, and he has done a lot of exploration into the idea of the boundaries - about how, as a man, he has formed social expectations about how far he's expected to push things with women, what happens when he doesn't act on it, and how that changes the interaction between model and photographer.

Most of his images are about female self-sexuality, so he's literally not part of the picture, and a lot of his effort, when creating the images, goes into providing the space for the women to be free in their self-expression. He has to establish a bond where they know he will not take advantage, even on a psychic level, so to speak.

(He's also done work with men, and challenged himself on assumptions and reactions that he has about same-sex eroticism.)

So in my eyes, it's entirely possible for someone to explore the sexual boundaries of the model-photographer relationship without it descending into potential abuse. And even if the photographer wanted to place themselves into the centre of the action, some careful thought could produce interesting imagery without sacrificing either the erotic side of things or a sense of respect for people.

But taking advantage of people in the course of creating your work shows no imagination at all. Just because you can, doesn't mean you should - and if you are, it's a sign that you're not working hard enough at what really matters.

It must be hard not to loose yourself in it. It's a dangerous research topic....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,814
Messages
15,238,734
Members
87,722
Latest member
pompompom13
Back
Top