Another clickbait from NYT. It’s nothing. Just full of surmises and basically unbacked claims. Writer: the word “boomer” is in + ALT just wrote an article about Anna = hmmmmmm I think I have a piece for you. “You wouldn’t challenge Anna in a group meeting — that’s just not how our operations work,” another editor said. In what world can any editor think that they can challenge the EIC? Make suggestions, sure. Pitch in ideas, sure? Challenge the EIC. Ma’am sit down. Even Vogue Singapore editors know better. Sure Vogue is no longer a sales powerhouse, but at the end of the day, the loyal readers are still there. Anna knows her core readers and what they want month after month. At a time when the world is preparing for a recession, that becomes very important. No sane executive will risk ushering a new EIC in. One cannot couple uncertainty with another uncertainty. Anna’s job is safe. Edward is safe. Alt is safe. Even Farneti is. All EICs are safe. Their salaries however is a whole different topic.